150 - Wind Turbine Fires with Guillermo Rein

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:00.100 --> 00:00:04.128
Hello everybody, welcome to the FarSense Show, episode 150.

00:00:04.128 --> 00:00:06.033
Wow, the time flies by so fast.

00:00:06.033 --> 00:00:10.890
I've just recorded the episode 100 and it seems to be a year ago already.

00:00:10.890 --> 00:00:16.230
As you hear this broadcast, I'm somewhere in the world enjoying my hot end vacations.

00:00:16.230 --> 00:00:18.060
But as they say, the show must go on.

00:00:18.060 --> 00:00:29.629
So here we are with this hopefully lovely episode, and I've invited the guest with whom it all started, with Professor Guillermo Reyn from the Imperial College London.

00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:35.909
I've let Guillermo pick the topic for this episode and he chose to speak about wind turbine fires.

00:00:35.909 --> 00:00:55.587
A very interesting topic, perhaps an overlooked problem in the world of engineering, perhaps not a big deal, certainly something we have a problem with deciding if it is a problem or not, because the industry is not really helpful, as in engineering fire safety of those devices.

00:00:55.587 --> 00:01:03.268
It's kind of an interesting problem of how to prevent the fires, how to mitigate the consequences of the fires.

00:01:03.268 --> 00:01:05.653
What can you do inside the wind turbine?

00:01:05.653 --> 00:01:11.313
Because you can imagine they are pretty remote and not very well accessible.

00:01:11.313 --> 00:01:18.694
So in case of a wind turbine, if there's a big fire growing inside, there's not very much things you can do.

00:01:18.694 --> 00:01:22.310
So well, fire safety engineers know their craft.

00:01:22.310 --> 00:01:38.311
They can create fire safety solutions for devices like this, but they have to be allowed to do that and, in some way, the industry is not really looking for that help, and that gives this episode, this discussion, an interesting twist.

00:01:38.311 --> 00:01:42.551
So, yeah, I think it's going to be a very interesting episode for you all.

00:01:42.551 --> 00:01:48.813
So please let me invite you, together with Guillermo Reyn for this episode on wind turbine fires.

00:01:53.700 --> 00:01:55.320
Welcome to the Firesize Show.

00:01:55.320 --> 00:01:58.784
My name is Wojciech Wigrzyński and I will be your host.

00:01:58.784 --> 00:02:18.258
This podcast is brought to you in collaboration with OFR Consultants.

00:02:18.258 --> 00:02:21.118
Ofr is the UK's leading fire risk consultancy.

00:02:21.118 --> 00:02:32.062
Its globally established team has developed a reputation for preeminent fire engineering expertise, with colleagues working across the world to help protect people, property and environment.

00:02:32.062 --> 00:02:47.848
Established in the UK in 2016 as a startup business of two highly experienced fire engineering consultants, the business has grown phenomenally in just seven years, with offices across the country in seven locations, from Edinburgh to Bath, and now employing more than a hundred professionals.

00:02:47.848 --> 00:02:59.513
Colleagues are on a mission to continually explore the challenges that fire creates for clients and society, applying the best research experience and diligence for effective, tailored fire safety solutions.

00:02:59.513 --> 00:03:13.486
In 2024, ofr will grow its team once more and is always keen to hear from industry professionals who would like to collaborate on fire safety futures this year, get in touch at ofrconsultantscom.

00:03:13.486 --> 00:03:15.331
Hello everybody, welcome to the FireSense Show.

00:03:15.331 --> 00:03:19.169
I'm here today with Professor Guillermo Reyn of the Imperial College London.

00:03:19.169 --> 00:03:20.783
Hello Guillermo, welcome back to the podcast.

00:03:21.384 --> 00:03:22.750
Hello Bojie, Good to be back.

00:03:22.750 --> 00:03:24.542
Thanks for inviting me again.

00:03:24.542 --> 00:03:26.264
You have a lot of patience.

00:03:26.806 --> 00:03:33.354
Well, and you have this free ticket thing that you can just redeem whenever you feel like it.

00:03:33.354 --> 00:03:35.868
So just send me an email and we'll do another one.

00:03:35.868 --> 00:03:46.532
Anyway, for this episode, you have chosen a very interesting subject to talk, and that is the fires of wind turbines and, in general, wind turbine fire safety.

00:03:46.532 --> 00:04:05.675
I guess we can place this within the broader scope of renewables, sustainability and fire, a gap that needs to be closed, and when I was researching, I found your paper from Edinburgh Times, published in the IFSS 2014.

00:04:05.675 --> 00:04:09.751
So we're at the 10th anniversary of your paper.

00:04:09.751 --> 00:04:11.907
Has much changed since then?

00:04:12.920 --> 00:04:19.810
The topic, no, has not changed for bad reasons, but the fascination has not changed either.

00:04:19.810 --> 00:04:22.067
It is a very interesting topic.

00:04:22.067 --> 00:04:23.769
It's a new hazard I'm a mechanical engineer.

00:04:23.769 --> 00:04:25.000
I'm's a new hazard having wind turbines.

00:04:25.000 --> 00:04:37.490
I'm a mechanical engineer, I'm obviously fascinated by wind turbines, All turbines, yeah, and it's for wind, which is important for you, Bocce, and it provides energy and is renewable and is literally you cannot get better.

00:04:37.490 --> 00:04:40.067
But I'm a forest scientist, I'm an engineer.

00:04:40.379 --> 00:04:47.952
So at some point when we were in Edinburgh, we got in the news this fascinating unfortunately fascinating images of a wind turbine on fire.

00:04:47.952 --> 00:04:52.071
You know, it's fascinating, in particular because the smoke becomes a tracer.

00:04:52.071 --> 00:04:56.932
You can actually visualize the flow of the wind turbine in the wake.

00:04:56.932 --> 00:05:02.160
So we wonder is this one-off or this happens with more frequency?

00:05:02.160 --> 00:05:18.310
So we got two students, two master's students, for the IMFSE At that time I was in Edinburgh so I could supervise them and we got two of them and we got together with Ricky Carville and David Lang and the team.

00:05:18.329 --> 00:05:20.040
The five of us did the study.

00:05:20.040 --> 00:05:24.540
What we found is that we were the first ones, as scientists, to look into the problem.

00:05:24.540 --> 00:05:27.783
We found that the data existed a little bit.

00:05:27.783 --> 00:05:31.067
What we found is that we were the first ones, as scientists, to look into the problem.

00:05:31.067 --> 00:05:32.307
We found that the data existed a little bit.

00:05:32.307 --> 00:05:34.829
We found that there was some knowledge of why these fires were happening.

00:05:34.829 --> 00:05:39.374
We saw knowledge of the frequency of them and, obviously, as engineers, we immediately identified the ways to address them.

00:05:39.374 --> 00:05:43.216
And that was when the students graduated and they went to work for industry.

00:05:45.279 --> 00:05:45.882
And then we polished the paper.

00:05:45.882 --> 00:05:55.492
So you said you were looking into the problem based on a single off incident that triggered I think I know which video you refer to because it was quite viral.

00:05:55.492 --> 00:06:02.064
Perhaps many of them were viral with this beautiful circles of smoke leaving the burning turbine leaving the burning turbine.

00:06:02.064 --> 00:06:13.791
And obviously since then I think I've also been, at least I've been noticing, you know, those fires in the media and they seem to happen every now and then.

00:06:13.791 --> 00:06:18.894
Do we have an estimate of how big problem is that overall?

00:06:18.894 --> 00:06:22.076
Like, how often do those fires happen in the industry?

00:06:22.718 --> 00:06:27.550
Yeah, so I'll tell you, I'll answer that question, which is the single most important question in the topic.

00:06:27.550 --> 00:06:28.944
I'll answer it in three parts.

00:06:28.944 --> 00:06:42.523
The first part is I think, in spending some time into this, that these fires are rare and they are not the end of the world and it is not the end of the wind turbine industry.

00:06:42.523 --> 00:06:44.165
Okay, that's the first answer.

00:06:44.165 --> 00:06:59.648
The second answer is when we look into the data we do see about, for example, when we did our team did the analysis we saw about one every 10,000 turbines, one fire every 10,000 turbines, which is literally you can just neglect it.

00:06:59.648 --> 00:07:03.004
When other people have done the studies, they have found one every 2,000 wind turbines.

00:07:03.004 --> 00:07:04.389
That starts to become a little bit too close to comfort.

00:07:04.389 --> 00:07:07.100
When other people have done the studies, they have found one every 2,000 wind turbines.

00:07:07.100 --> 00:07:09.966
That starts to become a little bit too close to comfort.

00:07:09.966 --> 00:07:11.391
One in 2,000, take into account.

00:07:11.391 --> 00:07:20.495
One turbine is about $2.5 million US dollars and every year that they are operating they produce half a million US dollars operations.

00:07:20.495 --> 00:07:29.735
So when you lose a turbine you lose your initial investment, but you also lose a lot of money every year that this turbine is not producing anymore.

00:07:29.735 --> 00:07:37.490
So having one fire every 2,000 turbines is uncomfortable, but we didn't see one every 2,000.

00:07:37.490 --> 00:07:38.846
We saw one every 10,000.

00:07:38.846 --> 00:07:41.168
And that number is much more easy to manage.

00:07:41.940 --> 00:07:43.750
And the third part is I should not be answering this question.

00:07:43.750 --> 00:07:45.358
Part is, I should not be answering this question.

00:07:45.358 --> 00:07:46.966
Borgio, we should not be answering this question.

00:07:46.966 --> 00:07:49.567
We are in this role today.

00:07:49.567 --> 00:07:50.410
We are scientists.

00:07:50.410 --> 00:07:52.548
It should be the industry who is answering this question.

00:07:53.160 --> 00:07:58.528
And when we asked industry, they told me, yes, we have the data and no, we are not going to tell you.

00:07:58.528 --> 00:08:04.543
And then I thought, okay, as a scientist, that's intriguing why they don't want to tell me.

00:08:04.543 --> 00:08:09.934
But at the same time, they want to tell me don't worry, guillermo, go to sleep, you don't have to worry, it's not a problem.

00:08:09.934 --> 00:08:11.365
But no, we're not going to show you the data.

00:08:11.365 --> 00:08:13.247
It's like I'm a scientist.

00:08:13.247 --> 00:08:19.033
My arguments for me run based on numbers and knowledge and hypotheses and testing.

00:08:19.033 --> 00:08:27.002
You cannot tell me that's okay, guillermo, go somewhere else, no problem here, nothing to see here.

00:08:27.002 --> 00:08:28.360
That only makes me really wonder what is the number now?

00:08:28.360 --> 00:08:34.440
And I guess at some point, Boje, someone from the industry, from the one-to-one industry, is going to be listening to this podcast.

00:08:34.440 --> 00:08:37.370
So I have a message for them Release the data.

00:08:37.370 --> 00:08:42.708
Find someone that independently will look into your data and will be able to answer this question.

00:08:43.259 --> 00:08:53.389
When you told me this could perhaps be an interesting topic to talk, first I was kind of like, is it really a good topic for a fire science show?

00:08:53.389 --> 00:09:04.346
And then, when I was thinking a lot about those wind turbine fires, I think it's a brilliant place where you could really well explain the value of fire safety.

00:09:04.346 --> 00:09:14.509
You know, because you have a very isolated device, the wind turbine itself, To the best of my knowledge, they would not propagate between the turbines.

00:09:14.509 --> 00:09:22.567
Okay, there's damage to surroundings and we'll probably touch that, but it's not that you have one turbine on fire and the rest of the park will get.

00:09:23.139 --> 00:09:25.489
And you know how much they cost to build.

00:09:25.489 --> 00:09:27.466
You know how much they produce per year.

00:09:27.466 --> 00:09:29.527
You know how much you would like to use them.

00:09:29.527 --> 00:09:47.460
So loss is like the most you know sharp you could have in fire safety, because you can tell up to like perhaps $10,000, exactly how much this fire has cost, and you can also, perhaps in dollar, tell how much it will cost to provide some.

00:09:47.460 --> 00:09:49.265
You know equipment that will reduce it.

00:09:49.265 --> 00:09:52.368
You know so and don't forget, that it's impossible to miss them.

00:09:53.181 --> 00:10:02.392
We were studying, we found more than 300 wind turbine fires like each of them with a date, a location and a photo and knowledge of it 300.

00:10:02.392 --> 00:10:05.708
And we use social media because of media, because there is no other way.

00:10:05.708 --> 00:10:15.208
So imagine how difficult it is to hide these fires from happening than even social media reports on them, instead of being the authorities or the owners, or the neighbors.

00:10:17.120 --> 00:10:18.647
Yeah, I mean it's kind of fascinating.

00:10:18.647 --> 00:10:20.287
Let's go deeper into this.

00:10:20.860 --> 00:10:23.009
I'll tell you we learn a lot in this work.

00:10:23.009 --> 00:10:33.567
We produced the paper that you referred to in 2014, and then we have a follow-up paper in 2021 where we revisit the problem and we continue on this.

00:10:33.567 --> 00:10:39.613
This was an article, not a paper, an article in the Society of Fire Protection Engineering magazine, but I'll tell you what we found.

00:10:39.613 --> 00:10:45.690
What we found is I want to highlight this, I don't want to get too excited and get people wrong on this I love renewable this.

00:10:45.690 --> 00:10:47.264
I don't want to get too excited and get people wrong on this I love renewable energy.

00:10:47.780 --> 00:10:55.509
I support wind turbine industry, but when we learned about wind turbine fires, we realized this was actually the dream of an arsonist.

00:10:55.509 --> 00:11:09.547
You take flammable materials different ones, some solid, some liquid, multiple of them and you put them in close proximity to multiple ignition sources mechanical and electrical and you put them very close to each other.

00:11:09.547 --> 00:11:21.568
You put them with plenty of oxygen and wind to make sure that things go you know when they go, they go well and you put them very far away from the firefighters, so everybody can see them, but the firefighters cannot reach them.

00:11:21.568 --> 00:11:23.864
That is, in a summary, a wind turbine.

00:11:23.864 --> 00:11:30.154
So the fuels, for example, are the large amount of polymers of plastics that are used in the nacelle.

00:11:30.154 --> 00:11:37.025
There is a lot of metal components, obviously, but there is a lot of composites, there is a lot of cables, there is a lot of insulation.

00:11:37.780 --> 00:11:38.705
So sorry to interrupt you.

00:11:38.705 --> 00:11:46.153
The nacelle is the part where the gearbox and generator is hosted and on top of that you have the blades.

00:11:46.153 --> 00:11:50.422
I hope that's the correct methodology.

00:11:50.422 --> 00:11:58.490
So if you could go once again like what's inside the nacelle and which parts of that are actually like flammable material, fire hazard potential.

00:11:59.179 --> 00:12:08.067
So the three main parts of a wind turbine are the tower, which is hollow and there's maybe cables going through it and a ladder to go up.

00:12:08.067 --> 00:12:12.355
Then the nacelle, which is the big part, which is bigger than I mean.

00:12:12.355 --> 00:12:16.128
It's a multi-story room, it's not a small room, it's a big room.

00:12:16.128 --> 00:12:49.889
It's called the nacelle, that doesn't have windows and it's just a big block where the engine and all the machinery is inside and then it has the blades which are attached to the nacelle, and inside the nacelle is where you have the gearbox, you have the mechanical elements, you have the electrical generator and then you have the cables and the controls, and the cables that go down to carry the electricity that has been generated in the nacelle Is the electricity converted already at the level of nacelle or it's a separate thing on the ground?

00:12:50.600 --> 00:12:51.345
Inside the nacelle.

00:12:51.345 --> 00:13:03.990
Inside the nacelle is where the energy is converted from mechanical in the shaft of the blades, is converted into electrical energy with a generator.

00:13:04.780 --> 00:13:12.389
I meant more like a transformer station where you would convert the voltages, but that's probably not the story.

00:13:12.389 --> 00:13:13.052
Yeah, no, that's true.

00:13:13.980 --> 00:13:28.967
It has a little bit of a transformer to control the quality of the signal at source, but that is something that typically is done at the farm level, not at the cell or turbine level, and which parts of it are combustible.

00:13:29.428 --> 00:13:29.850
Out of them.

00:13:30.831 --> 00:13:33.792
Absolutely, I mean literally no, a nacelle is.

00:13:33.792 --> 00:13:34.836
I mean to give you an idea.

00:13:34.836 --> 00:13:39.010
A nacelle would be almost like a flat, a two-story flat, london style.

00:13:39.010 --> 00:13:41.668
Um, it's completely full of stuff.

00:13:41.668 --> 00:13:43.441
It's very warm.

00:13:43.660 --> 00:13:49.506
The nacelle, when it's been operated for a very long time, as it's meant to be, becomes a very warm environment.

00:13:49.506 --> 00:13:57.333
There is heat that is being released inside by multiple reasons and it's very noisy and it's full of electrical parts and mechanical parts.

00:13:57.333 --> 00:13:58.535
So it's a dangerous place.

00:13:58.535 --> 00:14:08.539
It's not a place for anyone to be, fascinated for an engineer, unpleasant for other people, and there is a very large amount of polymers, plastics, inside a nacelle.

00:14:08.539 --> 00:14:14.933
The shell of a nacelle typically could be, and it is now made of composites which has a level of flammability.

00:14:14.933 --> 00:14:21.710
There is a lot of cables, many hundreds of meters of cables, which the insulation of the cables is made of polymer plastic.

00:14:21.710 --> 00:14:31.571
The insulation of the cables is made of polymer of plastic and it has insulation for heat transfer and for sound of different components and different parts of the nacelle that's also flammable.

00:14:31.571 --> 00:14:41.071
And then it has oils oils for the friction of mechanical parts, oils for insulating the electrical parts for the transformer, etc.

00:14:41.071 --> 00:14:45.390
And a great majority of these oils not all of them are flammable as well.

00:14:46.322 --> 00:14:48.087
And what about the blades?

00:14:48.087 --> 00:14:49.365
Like, are blades flammable?

00:14:49.424 --> 00:14:56.804
I'm pretty sure yeah the blades are made of very light, composite, very light, very strong, very large composite components and they are flammable.

00:14:56.804 --> 00:15:01.587
It doesn't happen frequent that the blades themselves get on fire.

00:15:01.587 --> 00:15:12.706
What happens more frequently in a fire is that then a cell gets on fire, but the blades themselves can also burn, and there are images of blades burning and spinning at the same time, which is a weird image.

00:15:13.539 --> 00:15:19.888
So if you look at those fires in the wind turbines, it's not that it's a very tiny fire.

00:15:19.888 --> 00:15:21.365
It went down on its own.

00:15:21.365 --> 00:15:28.980
Usually they would propagate and if they did they would have consequences probably fatal to the entire building.

00:15:28.980 --> 00:15:36.634
I wondered, like how many fires grow to a size where they are actually like destroying the entire turbine?

00:15:37.639 --> 00:15:46.426
So what we saw in the data is when there is a fire in a wind turbine, it most of the time 90% of the times it leads to the complete loss of the nacelle.

00:15:46.426 --> 00:15:49.567
So there's no way you can repair.

00:15:49.567 --> 00:15:52.028
You had a fire, you lost the nacelle, that's it.

00:15:52.028 --> 00:15:54.525
And then two things can happen.

00:15:54.525 --> 00:16:08.272
One is that it burns out and you lost the nacelle and you have to put a new nacelle, or the owners have to put a new nacelle and that's it, and it's only an economic concern of that specific investment.

00:16:08.272 --> 00:16:12.404
People might have seen it, my team might have seen it, maybe my team didn't see it.

00:16:13.801 --> 00:16:24.253
The other thing that can happen is that the fire starts to burn and it starts to throw debris metallic and otherwise pieces of plastic that are burning.

00:16:24.253 --> 00:16:26.147
They fall on the ground.

00:16:26.147 --> 00:16:28.548
They ignite what is called a secondary fire.

00:16:28.548 --> 00:16:38.928
This is more concerning because a secondary fire could actually go much further away than the single nacelle and, in principle, the responsible person would be the owner of a nacelle.

00:16:38.928 --> 00:16:40.633
And this has happened.

00:16:40.633 --> 00:16:51.049
About 10% of the cases that we saw I highlight that we saw, because the industry doesn't see the data 10% of the cases that we saw led to secondary fires.

00:16:51.049 --> 00:16:54.289
Some of them were burning the grass around the farm.

00:16:54.289 --> 00:16:58.051
Some of them were burning the factory where the nacelle was.

00:16:58.051 --> 00:17:01.350
Some of them were burning nearby infrastructure.

00:17:01.350 --> 00:17:08.626
So secondary fires is a concern because it is difficult to deny where the ignition source was.

00:17:09.619 --> 00:17:18.430
Is it like an effect of parts of the blades flying away at large distances, thrown away by the rotation, or more like a firebrand stuff caught by the wind?

00:17:18.430 --> 00:17:24.288
My imagination is going quite crazy about throwing big chunks.

00:17:24.782 --> 00:17:34.728
That would be a huge firebrand they already fall far without the need of the centipugal acceleration of the blades turning.

00:17:34.728 --> 00:17:38.049
The blades burning it happens very rarely.

00:17:38.049 --> 00:17:47.304
I would say blades maybe is actually about 5% of the fires in a turbine, but the production of firebrands is always every single turbine.

00:17:47.304 --> 00:17:48.588
Fire produces firebrands.

00:17:48.588 --> 00:17:51.984
There are pieces of different things that are burning and they start to go.

00:17:51.984 --> 00:17:56.249
You know a high altitude with wind, so they can actually fire hundreds of meters away.

00:17:56.249 --> 00:17:58.625
And this is despite that.

00:17:58.625 --> 00:18:03.009
Every wind turbine farm protects the immediate vicinity.

00:18:03.009 --> 00:18:14.833
They're aware of, for different reasons, that they should clear the grass and they should not have flammable things next to the tower and even doing this, 10% of the fires lead to secondary ignitions.

00:18:15.880 --> 00:18:22.913
In your SFP Europe paper I read the mention about a fire that happened in Riverside California.

00:18:22.913 --> 00:18:30.053
A fire that happened in Riverside California, so perhaps you can bring it up to the listeners to show how this can spiral up a little bit.

00:18:31.375 --> 00:18:33.036
Yeah, so this is just one of them.

00:18:33.036 --> 00:18:41.382
If we saw 10% of them, we saw literally about 20 or more, or we studied fires that led to secondary ignitions.

00:18:41.382 --> 00:18:43.843
But this happened in California, I think it was in Riverside.

00:18:43.843 --> 00:18:49.006
I have not immediately surrounding the tower, the turbine, because that grass had been removed, rightly so.

00:18:49.006 --> 00:19:01.119
It went to the farther away.

00:19:01.119 --> 00:19:05.946
So it means that the firebrands were reaching unexpected places for the owners.

00:19:05.946 --> 00:19:13.425
The owners were caught by surprise and it led to the burning of a nearby forest.

00:19:13.425 --> 00:19:19.914
It led to almost four kilometers square of forest burning, which is, I mean, it's a small wildfire.

00:19:20.195 --> 00:19:35.763
For wildfire scientists we're talking about much bigger wildfires, but taking into account that it was undeniably who was the ignition source, this, in the US, is very important because the ignition source in the US pays all the consequences of what happened.

00:19:35.763 --> 00:19:47.958
So the owner of this wind turbine had to pay for this, for the expenses of the cost of the damage that he had produced and if he had gone wrong, imagine that this was not a small wildfire.

00:19:47.958 --> 00:19:55.759
Imagine that this happened on a windy day, not too windy that you have to turn it off the wind turbine on a decently windy day in the summer.

00:19:55.759 --> 00:20:13.244
California, beautiful place I've lived there where the vegetation is dry, so maybe there's a heat wave, and then, instead of a few kilometers square, we start to talk about dozens of communities having to evacuate, and then people start to pay more attention.

00:20:13.244 --> 00:20:15.067
Unfortunately, when these bad things happen, then people start to pay more attention.

00:20:15.067 --> 00:20:17.560
Unfortunately, when these bad things happen, then people start to pay more attention.

00:20:18.214 --> 00:20:21.494
Okay, another thing that we have not touched yet is the ignition.

00:20:21.494 --> 00:20:28.804
In many fire considerations, media would usually focus on what was the cause of an ignition.

00:20:28.804 --> 00:20:39.367
For us, it's just one part of the switch that we try to solve, but do we know the typical causes of ignition in such devices?

00:20:40.095 --> 00:20:42.324
Yeah, there are many different reasons for ignition.

00:20:42.324 --> 00:20:47.046
When we look into the data, the leading cause of ignition is lightening strike.

00:20:47.046 --> 00:20:54.528
Okay, which is funny and not funny because all wind turbines are already protected against lightening strike.

00:20:54.528 --> 00:21:00.442
So, if they're already, because you don't want an electrical signal, artificial signal, going into the turbine.

00:21:00.442 --> 00:21:09.025
So if you protect them against lightning strike, and still this is the leading source of ignition, it means right power engineers are needed for sure.

00:21:10.395 --> 00:21:13.685
The other reasons were mechanical hotspots.

00:21:13.685 --> 00:21:20.082
So the maintenance of a cell for whatever the reason, is not as good as it should be, or maybe there are mechanical defects.

00:21:20.082 --> 00:21:27.241
Then mechanical parts that are in contact with each other, maybe in the gearboxes or maybe in the shaft, they start to heat up.

00:21:27.241 --> 00:21:34.119
We use hotspots because we are surrounded by seals, liquid and solid, and the hotspots become an ignition source.

00:21:34.119 --> 00:21:42.501
And the third reason is electrical arch, which is when some of the electrical elements they are not isolated from each other.

00:21:42.501 --> 00:21:51.705
It creates an arc and then the arc is a beautiful, unfortunately ignition source for flammable elements that might find in the vicinity of it.

00:21:52.355 --> 00:21:55.122
But from the statistic majority of lightnings right.

00:21:55.923 --> 00:22:00.055
The leading cause when we look from the statistic majority of lightnings right the leading cause when we look into the data, was lightning strike.

00:22:00.055 --> 00:22:09.863
It really caught our attention because every single wind turbine since they were invented obviously are protected against lightning strike because they are like begging for a strike, the leading cause of fires.

00:22:09.863 --> 00:22:16.784
Even if you were to design them better so that lightning strike doesn't become an ignition source, we still to design them better so that lightening structures can become an ignition source.

00:22:16.784 --> 00:22:20.535
We still have to deal with two other very different ignition sources the mechanical and the electrical.

00:22:20.535 --> 00:22:29.882
So this is a fantastic problem for a fire scientist because you have multiple fire problems, not just one, and then you bring something and it's solved.

00:22:29.882 --> 00:22:38.674
It has multiple things that is needed that the designers and the owners need to understand multiple things that is needed, that the designers and the owners need to understand.

00:22:40.974 --> 00:22:44.345
One thing that makes me curious do those challenges scale up with the size of the turbines?

00:22:44.345 --> 00:22:47.755
Because we also know that the turbines are growing, and especially the turbines installed overseas.

00:22:47.755 --> 00:22:56.604
So there's a big wind farm project in Poland and those are some massive, massive turbines, not like anything I've seen on the ground.

00:22:56.604 --> 00:23:01.305
So I wonder, is there a difference based on the size or just like?

00:23:02.255 --> 00:23:05.662
Well, if nothing else, I mean the thing is, every wind turbine is evolving.

00:23:05.662 --> 00:23:12.321
The technology is evolving in size, but it's also evolving in type of technology and material, so it's very difficult to compare.

00:23:12.321 --> 00:23:15.720
Then, as you make the wind turbine bigger, you're bringing more fuels.

00:23:15.720 --> 00:23:18.653
It's interesting that the you're bringing more fuels.

00:23:18.974 --> 00:23:22.015
It's interesting that the industry is not bringing less fuels, it's bringing more fuel in the sense I mean something that is flammable fuel.

00:23:22.015 --> 00:23:31.564
As for a fire engineer, and as you increase the power, you increase the strength of an arc, you increase the strength of a mechanical failure.

00:23:31.564 --> 00:23:40.682
So as you make it bigger, you bring the hazards developed in size to be bigger and the loss is bigger.

00:23:40.682 --> 00:23:48.221
It's not the same losing a cute small 1 megawatt turbine than losing one of these monsters, which they have now, of 10 megawatts.

00:23:48.221 --> 00:23:57.339
The economic loss and the amount of debris they will produce as firebrands it is much bigger as the wind turbines grows.

00:23:57.904 --> 00:24:02.319
Hopefully, the ones installed at the sea will not cause a secondary fire.

00:24:02.319 --> 00:24:06.481
It would be interesting, though, if it hit a ship nearby.

00:24:06.481 --> 00:24:08.521
That would be very bad luck.

00:24:08.521 --> 00:24:10.721
I can imagine such a scenario, though.

00:24:11.194 --> 00:24:13.517
No, but you know what is the problem with the ones at sea.

00:24:13.517 --> 00:24:20.156
It's actually fascinating, but all this is not that you can go into a textbook or there's a little manual, all these.

00:24:20.156 --> 00:24:26.561
I had to scratch it from different people that I've been meeting for the last 10 years, each of them giving me a piece of information and then getting it together.

00:24:26.561 --> 00:24:28.006
It's evacuation.

00:24:28.006 --> 00:24:39.583
The turbines in the sea are visited for maintenance by technicians way more often than the ones inland, and when they visit, they stay there for longer.

00:24:39.583 --> 00:24:44.406
Sometimes, actually, they have to sleep overnight several days while they fix the issue at sea.

00:24:45.076 --> 00:25:02.144
If you have a fire in the wind turbine while there is people in the nacelle, it is a very dramatic situation because they are rarely designed for evacuation situation because they are rarely designed for evacuation and unfortunately, there have already been fatalities of technicians that were in the wind turbine when the fire happened.

00:25:02.144 --> 00:25:04.922
This is something that industry said this will never happen.

00:25:04.922 --> 00:25:05.723
It's so infrequent.

00:25:05.723 --> 00:25:06.385
It's so infrequent.

00:25:06.385 --> 00:25:18.282
Well, unfortunately it happened, and the only time that I've seen the industry in more than five minutes of attention to fire safety was actually, unfortunately, when these two people died in the Netherlands.

00:25:18.282 --> 00:25:19.640
I think it was in 2014,.

00:25:19.640 --> 00:25:20.142
I think it was.

00:25:20.875 --> 00:25:31.104
For sure it's not a space designed for escape and for sure I mean based on my general knowledge in buildings and building systems.

00:25:31.104 --> 00:25:39.462
While ongoing maintenance is much better chance to get a fire than in normal operations, I mean there are hot works done.

00:25:40.375 --> 00:25:42.681
Actually, yeah, yeah, yeah, that was the fourth reason.

00:25:42.681 --> 00:25:53.967
The easier to handle is hot works, which is you have technicians doing something soldering or welding, or they're putting asbestos or something, and they themselves become the ignition source.

00:25:53.967 --> 00:25:54.568
That's the fourth.

00:25:54.568 --> 00:25:57.584
That's the easiest to handle, okay.

00:25:58.336 --> 00:26:05.386
We know why they burn they have flammable materials and they are isolated, and they're a nice place for fire to grow.

00:26:05.386 --> 00:26:11.667
They have some ignition sources more than sufficient to set the thing on fire.

00:26:11.667 --> 00:26:14.763
What can we do about the fires?

00:26:14.763 --> 00:26:16.161
It's quite fascinating, isn't it?

00:26:16.161 --> 00:26:22.188
So are they even equipped with detection systems and the active passive fire protection tools?

00:26:23.035 --> 00:26:25.522
Well, so the answer is we could do so many things.

00:26:25.522 --> 00:26:29.184
I mean not us, they don't want me to do this, but they could do so many things.

00:26:29.184 --> 00:26:44.546
I'm tended to this becoming a textbook case for teaching fire engineering of all the things that could be done, and most of them are not being acted upon or, when they are acted upon, they act in secrecy, because you know what happens.

00:26:44.546 --> 00:26:51.009
The industry says we've invested into protecting them, protecting them from what You've been denying that.

00:26:51.009 --> 00:26:53.132
This was an issue for the last 15 years.

00:26:53.132 --> 00:26:54.292
What are you protecting them from?

00:26:54.292 --> 00:27:04.943
So the industry has created themselves a situation where now they cannot even say that the assets are safer or that the assets are now being protected, because they've been denying the problem for too long.

00:27:04.943 --> 00:27:11.682
You know, I believe in explaining what fire engineers can do by explaining the layers of protection.

00:27:11.682 --> 00:27:23.046
As many layers as possible should be put between the fire and the asset we want to protect, this being life or property and environment, and it is not right, from my point of view, to just put one layer.

00:27:23.046 --> 00:27:33.082
You have to put multiple, because no layer, no single layer is perfect and the more you put, you drastically decrease the chance of a fire being able to breach through more than one layer.

00:27:33.082 --> 00:27:42.282
And the most popular layer, the one where I've met more people talking about that, is immediately the suppression industry.

00:27:42.282 --> 00:27:47.184
So now, with blinking eyes, with dollar signs in their eyes, what an opportunity.

00:27:47.184 --> 00:27:53.384
We are going to put suppression system in every single nacelle, and the industry pushed quite hard into this.

00:27:53.694 --> 00:27:58.826
They developed a few suppression systems which are specifically for nacelles for wind turbines.

00:27:58.826 --> 00:28:00.028
They work.

00:28:00.028 --> 00:28:02.382
I've seen results of this.

00:28:02.382 --> 00:28:02.823
They work.

00:28:02.823 --> 00:28:07.000
Some of them are based on gas flooding, Some of them are water mix, some of them are sprinklers.

00:28:07.000 --> 00:28:07.983
They work.

00:28:07.983 --> 00:28:10.222
They have two problems.

00:28:10.222 --> 00:28:14.217
One is they're expensive and the industry doesn't have a problem.

00:28:14.217 --> 00:28:17.519
They say so therefore, why put money into something that is not a problem?

00:28:17.519 --> 00:28:20.643
And the second one is they make the nacelle heavier.

00:28:20.643 --> 00:28:22.984
It's important that the nacelle is light.

00:28:22.984 --> 00:28:36.107
Obviously, you have to store bulky material and water or different agents, and that means that designers some of them, have put suppression systems in the nace cell, but they dislike it tremendously.

00:28:36.147 --> 00:28:43.557
Boje, I've met designers of leading wind turbine companies and they were looking into my eyes.

00:28:43.557 --> 00:28:49.558
I was giving them a presentation with my data and they looked into my eyes and they said I don't want this in my wind turbine.

00:28:49.558 --> 00:28:50.321
And I said why?

00:28:50.321 --> 00:28:56.125
And they said because we don't need it, because it's too expensive, because it's too big.

00:28:56.125 --> 00:28:57.499
And I say hey, because we don't need it because it's too expensive, because it's too big.

00:28:57.499 --> 00:28:59.205
And I thought and when do you come up with a number for safety?

00:28:59.205 --> 00:29:01.887
When do you come up with a number for I don't know?

00:29:01.887 --> 00:29:06.951
It has to be a threshold where the number of fires starts to trigger the requirement for technology.

00:29:06.951 --> 00:29:09.619
That was not the conversation, and he was a leading engineer.

00:29:09.619 --> 00:29:10.955
He well, all of them.

00:29:10.955 --> 00:29:11.538
There were many of them.

00:29:11.979 --> 00:29:17.990
The second layer that is popular now is not popular at all, but it's the most popular because no one talks about it, but a little bit.

00:29:17.990 --> 00:29:30.757
It's evacuation After people die, unfortunately while they were doing maintenance of a nacelle and they could not evacuate and no one could suppress the fire, and this was very dramatic because it happened in the front of everybody.

00:29:30.757 --> 00:29:42.704
They started to invest into emergency evacuation, which means systems that are in the nacelle or they're carried by the workers such that they can, in case of emergency, evacuate.

00:29:42.704 --> 00:29:53.801
The most popular one is ropes Ropes that you immediately can attach to different parts of the nacelle and immediately go down requires training, or ladders that you can roll so they don't take much space.

00:29:54.035 --> 00:30:12.878
I mean, remember, the tower inside is hollow and it has a ladder, but if the smoke goes into a tower then you cannot evacuate, or there is one access into the nacelle and you cannot access it, so to roll ladders that are made of rope, for example, and obviously there's people who thought why don't you just jump from the top of the nacelle with a parachute?

00:30:12.878 --> 00:30:14.462
But that's extremely dangerous.

00:30:14.462 --> 00:30:21.826
So that has not been pursued and they have even thought of what about a helicopter trying to go and rescue them.

00:30:21.826 --> 00:30:23.962
But also was considered to be way too dangerous.

00:30:24.694 --> 00:30:28.204
Next to spinning burning blades of a wind turbine.

00:30:28.325 --> 00:30:29.126
Extremely dangerous.

00:30:29.126 --> 00:30:30.818
But believe me that people thought about it.

00:30:30.818 --> 00:30:32.123
So now there is a little.

00:30:32.123 --> 00:30:33.085
You know what they did.

00:30:33.085 --> 00:30:33.666
It was very nice.

00:30:33.666 --> 00:30:35.801
There was a little paper on this.

00:30:35.801 --> 00:30:38.443
They started to calculate the evacuation time.

00:30:38.443 --> 00:30:40.180
It's like, you know, for engineers.

00:30:40.180 --> 00:30:54.500
Yeah, that's what you do you calculate the time it takes to evacuate and you compare this to the time for untenable conditions in the exit route, and then you make sure that these are rays and that your people are faster than the fire and the smoke.

00:30:54.500 --> 00:30:56.401
That's no, that's fire engineering.

00:30:56.401 --> 00:30:59.780
Well, it took them a long time to start doing this.

00:31:00.522 --> 00:31:01.084
Good direction.

00:31:01.084 --> 00:31:02.346
Come on, be positive.

00:31:02.346 --> 00:31:03.429
What about detection?

00:31:03.734 --> 00:31:08.626
Detection is a mystery to me because the wind turbines are full of sensors.

00:31:08.626 --> 00:31:10.781
It is a science craft Boje.

00:31:10.781 --> 00:31:12.315
It has so many sensors.

00:31:12.315 --> 00:31:14.763
Sometimes not even the experts know the sensors they have.

00:31:14.763 --> 00:31:16.721
They measure everything.

00:31:16.721 --> 00:31:19.624
Literally name a sensor, they have it.

00:31:19.624 --> 00:31:22.262
None of them is being used for fire safety.

00:31:22.262 --> 00:31:26.846
That is one of the biggest mysteries I have with the people in the wind turbine industry.

00:31:26.846 --> 00:31:31.727
It's like you could use about 20 of these sensors for detecting fire.

00:31:31.727 --> 00:31:33.480
Obviously it would not be straightforward.

00:31:33.480 --> 00:31:35.403
None of these sensors was developed to detect a fire.

00:31:35.403 --> 00:31:39.537
I understand Some of them are measuring no light conditions inside the nacelle.

00:31:39.537 --> 00:31:41.083
Some of them are measuring temperature.

00:31:41.083 --> 00:31:45.740
Some of them are measuring vibrations that could lead to hotspot in the fiction event.

00:31:45.740 --> 00:31:50.663
Some of them are looking into malfunction of the cables, which would indicate arching.

00:31:50.663 --> 00:31:56.923
These sensors would require some work to be converted into detection, but the sensor is already there.

00:31:56.923 --> 00:32:01.666
The capital, the investment, the signal, the monitoring, the storage, everything's already done.

00:32:02.795 --> 00:32:04.961
And what about passive fire protection?

00:32:04.961 --> 00:32:07.366
Separation and compartmentation?

00:32:07.366 --> 00:32:08.699
I think it's properly called.

00:32:09.481 --> 00:32:13.242
Super important I mean compartmentation is you have such a.

00:32:13.242 --> 00:32:17.625
The Nacelle is such a big place, it's a multi-story room without windows.

00:32:17.625 --> 00:32:40.329
You might have a fire because an ignition source has found a fuel, but you want is not to avoid the spread of the fire and the smoke the smoke because it might actually get the ignitions into trouble, and the fire itself because it would lead to, instead of repairing the wind turbine, which is something relatively easy you don't want to lose a whole wind turbine and you don't want the wind turbine to produce secondary fires.

00:32:40.329 --> 00:32:49.162
So to avoid that is compartmentation, and you find sharp boundaries between the parts that could get into a fire and you just separate with fire resistance.

00:32:49.162 --> 00:32:51.301
That is something that engineers do all the time.

00:32:51.994 --> 00:33:02.541
But there's not that many to separate, to be honest, because it's like, on one hand it's full of machinery, but it's fairly simple because you're going to have the main power generating unit.

00:33:02.541 --> 00:33:05.494
You won't be able to split into multiple fire components.

00:33:05.494 --> 00:33:08.067
You're familiar with this Fire engineers were invited.

00:33:08.228 --> 00:33:08.690
Well, first.

00:33:08.690 --> 00:33:14.036
Fire engineers are not invited to this design, but when they're invited, they're invited when everything has been set.

00:33:14.036 --> 00:33:19.317
So, how is the fire engineer going to say, hey, why don't we put a separation here?

00:33:19.317 --> 00:33:20.038
What you mean?

00:33:20.038 --> 00:33:22.258
A separation across the shaft of the turbine?

00:33:22.258 --> 00:33:22.838
No, we can't.

00:33:22.838 --> 00:33:33.201
So obviously, if the industry wants to compartmentalize for fire safety, they need to do this from the beginning, To have this from the beginning in mind, not at the end.

00:33:33.201 --> 00:33:36.442
Fire engineers, we do amazing things, but we don't do magic.

00:33:37.202 --> 00:33:38.863
What else do we have left Structural?

00:33:38.863 --> 00:33:46.085
But I guess the damage would not be due to the tower falling down, that's not the best.

00:33:46.204 --> 00:33:52.287
Very rarely the tower collapses, so typically the tower stays put, Typically not always.

00:33:52.287 --> 00:33:53.186
Sometimes it collapses.

00:33:53.186 --> 00:34:02.470
It collapses, it is a hazard to anything that is around, and also take into account that it collapses and it might still be on fire and even the insides of the tower might be on fire.

00:34:02.470 --> 00:34:06.611
So you multiply the chances of a secondary fire when that happens.

00:34:06.611 --> 00:34:14.393
But the layer that receives least attention although we've published a paper on this is the prevention layer, which is technical prevention.

00:34:14.432 --> 00:34:16.112
I'm not saying prevention, don't play with matches.

00:34:16.112 --> 00:34:17.974
No one plays with matches in a wind turbine.

00:34:17.974 --> 00:34:26.014
Technical prevention is that the ignition source should not be strong enough to ignite the material that is nearby, which should not be too flammable.

00:34:26.014 --> 00:34:32.943
When there is an intersection between the power of the ignition source and the flammability of the material, then you have ignition.

00:34:32.943 --> 00:34:50.525
So you should have power sources that are not as powerful and you separate them from the materials that are flammable, and the materials that are flammable should be at least less flammable, not as technical prevention, and you immediately guess what decrease the frequency of fires and your super layer, the fire brigade.

00:34:50.594 --> 00:34:53.304
I guess that slice of the cheese is not on this board.

00:34:53.815 --> 00:35:10.405
The fire brigades very rarely suppresses tool-bind fires because lack of resources I mean not resources, lack of remit, right, who has the fire brigade, which is mostly paid by taxpayer or the voluntary service, to go up there, to this strange machine that is up there?

00:35:10.405 --> 00:35:14.460
So I think the only thing we see in our data, the only thing we see is about 10%.

00:35:14.460 --> 00:35:16.722
So 90% of the fires are left.

00:35:16.722 --> 00:35:22.105
They burn, and what they do always and they're really good at this is they secure the perimeter.

00:35:22.105 --> 00:35:37.766
Okay, they avoid secondary fires, or they try to avoid secondary fires, if they can Yet remember, 10% of the fires actually lead to secondary fires, even sometimes with the presence of the fire brigade, because it's a fire that might be burning there for many hours.

00:35:38.735 --> 00:35:42.226
Okay, we got all that is in there, all that can lead to a fire.

00:35:42.226 --> 00:35:44.804
We've just went through what you can do.

00:35:44.804 --> 00:35:48.349
And now the reason why I wanted this episode.

00:35:48.349 --> 00:35:49.594
I mean it's super funny.

00:35:49.594 --> 00:35:56.608
It's like fire engineering in a probe on a very isolated microorganism that you can totally play with.

00:35:57.876 --> 00:36:04.208
I wonder there must be a point at which investing in your fire safety starts to pay out.

00:36:04.208 --> 00:36:25.228
If you have a number on how many of those turbines burn down one per 2,000, one per 10,000, if you know how much a turbine costs, and I would guess that you can scale the cost of the turbine per megawatt of power generation, and the same way you can scale up the production rate of a facility.

00:36:25.228 --> 00:36:30.302
So one megawatt turbine will create like a thousand more than a one kilowatt turbine, right?

00:36:30.302 --> 00:36:38.914
I wonder if there is a cutoff at which some of those points become a net gain for the investor.

00:36:38.914 --> 00:36:42.867
Like when do you start making money on fire protection on those turbines?

00:36:42.867 --> 00:36:50.869
When you will, over the life of your farm, earn more on your sprinklers than spend on putting them in place, right?

00:36:51.958 --> 00:36:54.045
So this is a very interesting conversation.

00:36:54.045 --> 00:37:00.188
In our first paper, we tried to have this conversation with numbers, but it didn't lead to a discussion with the industry.

00:37:00.188 --> 00:37:03.023
No one was interested in these numbers, probably because our numbers were wrong.

00:37:03.023 --> 00:37:08.166
No, we tried to look into cost of technology versus saving the investment.

00:37:08.166 --> 00:37:11.605
So I'm fine that they didn't like our numbers, absolutely fine.

00:37:11.605 --> 00:37:13.543
I just thought they were going to have a conversation.

00:37:13.543 --> 00:37:20.469
The conversation is not happening and I thought it is not happening because for them and they own the data this is not a clear case.

00:37:20.469 --> 00:37:23.804
For them, it's not clear that fire engineering is needed.

00:37:24.815 --> 00:37:29.842
I think they feel they can absorb the losses, but I'm going to put two words into this.

00:37:29.842 --> 00:37:40.800
They thought they could absorb the losses until they realized that they could be having to pay for all the damage they produce around them and many wind turbine farms.

00:37:40.800 --> 00:37:44.007
There was our own land and surrounded by forests.

00:37:44.007 --> 00:37:52.576
Some of these forests are very large, some of them are very pretty, some of them are very famous, some of them have people inside, and that's when the wind turbine industry started to feel more uncomfortable about this.

00:37:52.576 --> 00:37:58.300
When the wind turbine industry started to feel more uncomfortable about this when they said it's not about the cost of a nacelle.

00:37:58.300 --> 00:38:03.643
That happens one every 10,000, according to Guillermo, one every 2,000, according to someone else.

00:38:03.643 --> 00:38:08.766

150 - Wind Turbine Fires with Guillermo Rein

Listen On

Risk, Performance Based Engineering and Modelling Episodes

Sustainable future and burning issues Episodes

Recent Episodes