June 12, 2024

155 - New Guideline for PV Fire Safety with Grunde Jomaas

155 - New Guideline for PV Fire Safety with Grunde Jomaas
The player is loading ...
155 - New Guideline for PV Fire Safety with Grunde Jomaas

Misconceptions in fire science are a strange thing. You present countless proof, publish research papers, and carry conversations, and yet… they live their own lives—spreading with no control and cluttering communication. One space is full of them—the fire safety of photovoltaic installations on flat roofs. In the Fire Science Show, we already had two very powerful episodes on PV—one with Jens Kristensen and one more recently with Reidar Stølen.

 In today's episode, we highlight a new guideline document published by the team at FRISSBE led by Prof. Grunde Jomaas. I invited Grunde to walk me through their document, and I took this opportunity to learn the origins, sources and inspirations for all the aspects they covered. The guideline takes you through ignition, fire spread, building roof construction and firefighting, giving a unique holistic overhaul of the topic. Most importantly, it is short, concise, and written in the most approachable way. This is a really good example of how communication in fire science should look. 

You can access the guideline directly here: https://www.frissbe.eu/upload/files/FRISSBE-ZAG%20BAPV%20Fire%20Safety%20Guideline%20May%202024%20v3.pdf

To complement this piece, you may also read this article on the background: Rus, N., Jomaas, G. (2024) PV guidelines – are the recommendations sufficiently evidence-based?

 As my personal recommendation, Grunde is a top communicator on LinkedIn, and you should follow him. He also runs a weekly newsletter, Burning Matters. I highly recommend this resource! 

----
The Fire Science Show is produced by the Fire Science Media in collaboration with OFR Consultants. Thank you to the podcast sponsor for their continuous support towards our mission.

Chapters

00:00 - Clearing Misconceptions on Photovoltaic Fire Safety

13:54 - Discussing Rooftop Fire Ignition Hazards

26:01 - Roof Construction and Fire Dynamics

41:11 - Fire Engineering Challenges and Solutions

47:52 - Fire Safety Systems and Challenges

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:00.442 --> 00:00:01.806
Hello and welcome to the FireScience Show.

00:00:01.806 --> 00:00:14.212
Whenever I post an episode on photovoltaics and new technologies in the sustainable world, those episodes get a lot of attention and they seem to be very appreciated by the audience.

00:00:14.212 --> 00:00:17.751
So here I am with another episode of that kind.

00:00:17.751 --> 00:00:22.852
It's going to be about photovoltaics, and PVs are quite an interesting story.

00:00:22.852 --> 00:00:35.146
Two years ago I had Jens in the podcast, who I thought cleared most of the misconceptions about PV panels, especially highlighting the role of the roof construction and treating them as a system.

00:00:35.146 --> 00:00:46.831
Then, sometime later, I had Radar from Norway, who was talking about building integrated photovoltaics, also reemphasizing some of the same thoughts as Jens did.

00:00:46.831 --> 00:00:52.067
So with all this information out there, why there would be misconceptions anymore.

00:00:52.067 --> 00:00:53.463
And yet they are.

00:00:53.463 --> 00:01:02.219
Yet you see them every day on LinkedIn and around People not really getting what is the fire issue with the photovoltaic panels.

00:01:02.823 --> 00:01:14.343
So here today let's try once again to clear the misconceptions around the fire safety of PV panels, and for that I've invited Professor Grunde Jumas from Frisbee.

00:01:14.343 --> 00:01:17.230
That's a part of ZAK in Slovenia.

00:01:17.230 --> 00:01:25.311
Grunde is my good friend, we do some research together and, most importantly, we are figuring linkedin out together.

00:01:25.311 --> 00:01:37.412
Since he's 10 times bigger than I am on linkedin, I refuse to call him anything else than grunders and say, but yeah, we're having a lot of fun there trying to get some good communications to the people.

00:01:37.412 --> 00:01:40.825
And yes, communication, that's the point of today's episode.

00:01:40.825 --> 00:02:05.927
I've invited Grunder to talk about PV not just because he has a decade of experience testing and experimenting with photovoltaics and the fire safety, not just because he's a great communicator, but his group, frisbee, has just released a brilliant piece of communication, a guideline on fire safety, photovoltaic panels on flat roofs, and this is the direct reason why we are here today.

00:02:05.927 --> 00:02:11.484
We're going to discuss that guideline in depth, but you know not just what's written inside we're going to talk about.

00:02:11.484 --> 00:02:13.552
Where did all of this come from?

00:02:13.552 --> 00:02:17.284
What is the experimental background for all the claims that we discussed?

00:02:17.284 --> 00:02:24.784
From the book and also other guidelines that exist out there, because that's obvious, that it's not just the sole source of knowledge.

00:02:25.366 --> 00:02:39.786
I think this episode will be very beneficial if you have to deal with PV panels and if you don't, well, perhaps sometime in the future you will, so still worth listening.

00:02:39.786 --> 00:02:41.413
It's very good to listen to this episode having a PV in front of your eyes.

00:02:41.413 --> 00:02:52.205
I know many of you will be jogging or driving, so that's going to be harder, but if you have ability to open up the guideline and just look at the contents as we discuss them, I think it's going to be much better experience for you.

00:02:52.205 --> 00:02:57.644
The link to the guideline is in the show notes and the podcast episode is right behind the intro.

00:02:57.644 --> 00:03:00.406
Let's spin it up and jump episodes.

00:03:00.406 --> 00:03:07.432
Welcome to the Firesize Show.

00:03:07.432 --> 00:03:10.877
My name is Vojtěch Vyngřínský and I will be your host.

00:03:10.877 --> 00:03:27.311
This podcast is brought to you in collaboration with OFR Consultants.

00:03:27.879 --> 00:03:30.179
Ofr is the UK's leading fire risk consultancy.

00:03:30.179 --> 00:03:41.112
Its globally established team has developed a reputation for preeminent fire engineering expertise, with colleagues working across the world to help protect people, property and environment.

00:03:41.112 --> 00:03:56.925
Established in the UK in 2016 as a startup business of two highly experienced fire engineering consultants, the business has grown phenomenally in just seven years, with offices across the country in seven locations, from Edinburgh to Bath, and now employing more than a hundred professionals.

00:03:56.925 --> 00:04:08.586
Colleagues are on a mission to continually explore the challenges that fire creates for clients and society, applying the best research experience and diligence for effective, tailored fire safety solutions.

00:04:08.586 --> 00:04:19.641
In 2024, ofr will grow its team once more and is always keen to hear from industry professionals who would like to collaborate on fire safety futures this year.

00:04:19.641 --> 00:04:22.545
Get in touch at ofrconsultantscom.

00:04:22.966 --> 00:04:28.553
Hello everybody, I'm here today with Professor Grunde Jumas from Frisbee Project in Slovenia.

00:04:28.553 --> 00:04:33.029
Hello, grunde, hey, wojciech, good to see you, sensei, on the podcast.

00:04:33.029 --> 00:04:35.086
Happy that you joined us.

00:04:35.086 --> 00:04:41.490
And the topic is of great importance, that's the photovoltaics on flat roofs.

00:04:41.490 --> 00:04:47.487
The direct reason is a guideline that your group has released something like a month ago.

00:04:47.487 --> 00:04:56.630
Tomorrow there's a big webinar, from what I've heard, and I know there's a lot of interest on PV panels in the fire science community.

00:04:56.630 --> 00:05:03.009
Thanks for getting on this important subject, but what made you do the guidelines?

00:05:03.009 --> 00:05:06.629
What was the inspiration to put the knowledge into a guideline actually?

00:05:06.629 --> 00:05:19.730
Well, I guess the direct answer was, as you can read in the guideline, it came as a result of a meeting that was held in Brussels last year, hosted by NFPA, fm Global and Rockwool

00:05:19.730 --> 00:05:27.086
, where there was also released a document by the NFPA Research Foundation with the slides, some discussions from that meeting.

00:05:27.086 --> 00:05:34.733
But then we realized that we wanted to try to put out what is hopefully a clear communication on the topic.

00:05:34.733 --> 00:06:03.432
And also the second part is that we can't escape this in a discussion between the two of us LinkedIn our friend and foe in a discussion between the two of us linked in our our friend and foe, I could see from a lot of debates there's a lot of things that people don't get that say that I take for granted some key concepts that we try to portray in the guideline, where people think that, oh, it's the bitumen that is the problem, or it's this specific membrane or it's this panel that is the problem.

00:06:03.853 --> 00:06:28.286
so there was a lack of understanding of what one of the main messages in the guideline is that you have to think of it as a system, not just of the individual components or products involved it's funny that you say that, because I also had jens in the podcast like a hundred episodes ago, long time ago, and one of the most popular episodes of the Fire Science Show, jens was your PhD student.

00:06:28.286 --> 00:06:35.125
He'd done his PhD on burning the PV panels, basically on different membranes, different settings and what you just said.

00:06:35.125 --> 00:06:37.519
You know, he kind of cleared that out right.

00:06:37.519 --> 00:06:41.607
There's paper out of that, many papers out of that, there's his PhD thesis.

00:06:41.607 --> 00:06:49.627
You could argue that the information is out there for anyone who is like a Google search away from that information.

00:06:49.627 --> 00:06:52.649
Yet people would still share the misconceptions.

00:06:52.649 --> 00:06:54.466
Yet people would still not seek it.

00:06:55.060 --> 00:07:06.742
We've been talking for some time about having a discussion on your podcast and I said, well, jens already told everything in in terms of pv on the podcast, I don't know.

00:07:06.742 --> 00:07:12.221
And then you have radar, complement that with some slope proof and vipv and other things.

00:07:12.221 --> 00:07:17.512
Then we decide, okay, now the guy and we have a an excuse, uh, to revisit it.

00:07:17.512 --> 00:07:27.675
But it also because the the number of times where I've copied jens's googleolar page and put it as an answer to people in questions on LinkedIn.

00:07:27.675 --> 00:07:31.408
I say just go here, the papers here are telling all of this.

00:07:31.408 --> 00:07:39.809
Or, similarly, check out these papers by Raida, check out these people by the group in Malaysia and their references, of course, and so on.

00:07:39.809 --> 00:07:44.591
But it is amazing how many times you have to say some things.

00:07:44.591 --> 00:07:58.512
And it's actually interesting because you say Jens is PhD, but Jens actually did also a master's on the topic at BTU that started, and before that we did an industry project and that started it all.

00:07:59.000 --> 00:08:04.333
And I talked with another former student just some months ago where I said, oh, can I use this video?

00:08:04.333 --> 00:08:08.923
And he said, well, I don't know if it's really in the public domain, I have to check with some people.

00:08:08.923 --> 00:08:13.988
That probably don't work here, but it's almost 10 years ago and I said because I wanted to show it.

00:08:13.988 --> 00:08:19.821
And he's like, yeah, the thing is he said we already had the answer at that point, we just didn't know it.

00:08:19.821 --> 00:08:28.809
So you know, it just shows how it's a slow process for the messages to get out there and for people to get the details.

00:08:28.809 --> 00:08:37.777
And of course there are many stakeholders that also don't necessarily want to have the debate, that want it to be communicated the way it is.

00:08:37.777 --> 00:08:43.802
So they try to dilute the information pool a little bit.

00:08:43.802 --> 00:08:45.568
And you know there's nothing wrong with that.

00:08:45.568 --> 00:08:52.485
So to speak, everybody has the right to promote their own solutions, as long as they're safe, I guess.

00:08:53.028 --> 00:08:53.931
Unless they're not fireballs.

00:08:53.931 --> 00:08:56.837
Anyway, it's an interesting momentum.

00:08:56.837 --> 00:09:02.206
When I was entering the profession I was perhaps a little bit naive.

00:09:02.206 --> 00:09:05.284
I thought that you need research, that this regulation.

00:09:05.284 --> 00:09:11.202
But today I'm more aware that there's another step communicating the regulation or communicating the science.

00:09:11.202 --> 00:09:13.648
That's as important as having the science and regulations.

00:09:13.648 --> 00:09:23.263
So and I say that because I first wanted to complement the guideline it's a great piece of communication and we will come back to this point many, many times.

00:09:23.263 --> 00:09:24.923
So we know where it came from.

00:09:24.923 --> 00:09:33.390
Tell me what it's about, what is in the scope and perhaps what important parts are not in the scope of this document.

00:09:33.951 --> 00:09:40.235
So, just first and foremost, right now, you know, there's no names on the guideline.

00:09:40.235 --> 00:09:53.140
We had a bit of a discussion Should we have the names on of authors, but we felt that it's maybe it's better just to have Zag Frisbee as an entity instead of specific names, given that it's a guideline.

00:09:53.140 --> 00:10:08.884
But the authors, the main authors, are Nick Russ, alessi Huguet and myself that have been writing this and, with all due respect to a lot of it comes from compiling existing information and this is one of the main.

00:10:08.884 --> 00:10:13.413
You know, I guess we had the three maybe main goal of the guideline.

00:10:13.413 --> 00:10:18.892
One was it shouldn't be too long, it should be so people will actually read it.

00:10:18.932 --> 00:10:22.024
There are other guidelines that are very good.

00:10:22.024 --> 00:10:35.620
I'm not criticizing them, but we know that people just put them in the drawer because they're too specific, they're too long, too many recommendations, and so we wanted an overview guideline, not an installation guideline.

00:10:35.620 --> 00:10:37.467
It's not an installation guideline.

00:10:37.467 --> 00:10:40.600
We wanted it to be well documented.

00:10:40.600 --> 00:10:57.754
Hence you can see we have two pages of small font references with links and we wanted it to create an overview, holistic overview that touches from sort of like the start.

00:10:57.754 --> 00:11:05.980
So hence we have the figure where we talk about the ignition hazards, the fire dynamics, the roof construction and the firefighting operations.

00:11:05.980 --> 00:11:07.163
And then we go.

00:11:07.163 --> 00:11:12.494
We try to be sort of pedagogical about talking about these four aspects.

00:11:13.320 --> 00:11:17.648
And the scope, if I assume correctly, is for flat roofs.

00:11:17.648 --> 00:11:18.429
That's one point.

00:11:18.429 --> 00:11:39.570
It's for PV panels that are placed on the roof, so not as a part of the roof, and also for fire hazards that would start mainly in the installations or in its vicinity, not as a part of the building fire that eventually spread to roof right yeah, so so that's why you know we start.

00:11:40.030 --> 00:11:43.567
Of course, you know, in the guideline we do have a table of contents.

00:11:43.567 --> 00:11:48.245
Then we we have the summary and then the scope and, as you said, the scope.

00:11:48.245 --> 00:12:06.923
We do have a figure where we explain that you have a fire that can start inside the building and go to the roof and you have a fire that starts on the roof, and predominantly we focus on the ones starting on the roof, because the ones that start in the building technically should be dealt with already through building regulation on the roof, because the ones that start in the building technically should be dealt with already through building regulation.

00:12:06.923 --> 00:12:12.975
That is of course, not always the case, but then you can't always then see.

00:12:12.975 --> 00:12:20.542
You know, it's important also to not blame solar or blame things for things that are are not part of the root cause.

00:12:20.542 --> 00:12:42.965
But at the same time, the frontispiece is a picture from the Asko distribution center in Norway and that fire started inside the building and it spread to the roof and because the fire section walls didn't extend up through the wall, it spread along the wall and then into another fire section, so it became a very big fire.

00:12:42.965 --> 00:12:54.149
So that is a route and that's where, of course, the PV panels played a significant role, because in other circumstances the energy would just be vented up and you wouldn't have spread across the route.

00:12:54.149 --> 00:13:03.572
But then we do focus on this new ignition source, this new system on the roof that can lead to fire scenarios there.

00:13:04.179 --> 00:13:11.173
And yes, we don't talk about building integrated pv vip, it is building applied photovoltaics.

00:13:11.173 --> 00:13:16.669
And when you say flat roofs, some people ask me recently oh, is there a big difference with slope roof?

00:13:16.669 --> 00:13:23.086
There are some many similarities, so it's not like that's a whole new chapter to do.

00:13:23.086 --> 00:13:28.595
You can actually see some of the work that's been done by Rise Fire Research in Norway.

00:13:28.595 --> 00:13:30.186
We mentioned Reidar.

00:13:30.186 --> 00:13:39.285
One thing with the slow proof for example, they did some testing with bitumen was that then you had the flowing of the bitumen, but as a system.

00:13:39.285 --> 00:13:54.750
They've also published, I think, some things in PV Magazine and some other places where the whole thing with the critical gaps, the ignition, the spreading and so on are on a membrane that otherwise doesn't lead to power spread are very similar.

00:13:54.750 --> 00:13:56.046
But there are some nuances.

00:13:56.960 --> 00:13:59.889
Well, you have to put the frame somewhere, I guess.

00:13:59.889 --> 00:14:03.167
I guess this is how you framed it and that's absolutely fine.

00:14:03.167 --> 00:14:06.249
Let's try to get into the contents of the guide.

00:14:06.249 --> 00:14:16.452
You said it has four specific, not chapters, but areas that it covers the ignition itself, the dynamics, the roof construction and then the firefighting.

00:14:16.452 --> 00:14:19.951
So perhaps let's use this framework also in this discussion.

00:14:19.951 --> 00:14:22.321
Let's start with the ignition hazards.

00:14:22.321 --> 00:14:23.522
Let's start with the ignition hazards.

00:14:23.522 --> 00:14:36.210
So you've been a part of a team that was investigating the probabilities or the statistics of rooftop fires, so let's perhaps start with that how often those fires happen and how did you figure out a number?

00:14:36.750 --> 00:14:44.054
So that was a study that we Jens again as a PhD student and myself got involved with.

00:14:44.054 --> 00:14:45.636
Jens is such a star.

00:14:45.636 --> 00:14:46.636
He's a star.

00:14:46.636 --> 00:14:47.317
I quote him.

00:14:47.317 --> 00:14:55.504
He said at some point during his PhD that I'm a one trick pony, but it's a very, very good trick and it's shown.

00:14:55.504 --> 00:15:04.727
You know, to some extent we've been lucky that it was very timely and we started way back when I was at DTU 2015, 14, almost.

00:15:05.299 --> 00:15:17.547
There's been 10 years of doing some of this and it's not that we were groundbreaking in that sense, because you have the work done by Backstrom and UL and things going back.

00:15:17.547 --> 00:15:24.349
Also, you can see some of the reference we have to Cancellary and SM Global's documents.

00:15:24.349 --> 00:15:31.750
But anyway, so we did this work with a group from Malaysia you know Saputria, and it's difficult to get good numbers.

00:15:31.750 --> 00:15:42.147
Yeah, Because a lot of it's based on media reports and does big graze salts, because what's reported in media is maybe just big fires.

00:15:42.147 --> 00:15:46.760
Nobody will report a small house fire and so on, but they're, you know they're.

00:15:47.101 --> 00:15:57.706
What we ended up with in that paper was to say that to a reasonable extent, we said 29 fires per gigawatt per year, per gigawatt installed.

00:15:57.706 --> 00:16:00.953
And some people say, oh, you know how much is this.

00:16:00.953 --> 00:16:03.765
And, yeah, what does the number mean?

00:16:03.765 --> 00:16:05.450
Actually, possibility?

00:16:05.450 --> 00:16:19.636
Somebody said you know, there was uh, this a few years ago, the fire at uh in bristol that we are the curious museum and somebody going to oh, it's a freak incident, it's only 0.01 chance of a fire.

00:16:19.636 --> 00:16:26.993
And then somebody in the comments said well, there's about I about I don't know like 2 million solar installations in the UK.

00:16:26.993 --> 00:16:37.815
So if you multiply that up, that means that you should have about 200 fires per year, which corresponds quite well to the fire service saying that there are several times a week are called out to PV fires.

00:16:37.815 --> 00:16:48.788
So it is not a small problem because in risk theory you often want to go to 10 to the minus 6, not to 10 to the minus 4, which is 0.01%.

00:16:48.788 --> 00:16:57.052
So it is actually a significant problem in many risk aspects and this is what we also see.

00:16:57.111 --> 00:17:14.984
You know there's a figure there that we took from the Clean Energy Associates, where they had inspected 600 sites worldwide and I think they came with something like 96% of these places had some mistakes and we've shown.

00:17:14.984 --> 00:17:21.441
You know the 10 main things related to grounding issues, damage module, cross-mated connectors, the list.

00:17:21.441 --> 00:17:23.628
You know there's 10 main issues.

00:17:23.628 --> 00:17:28.523
All of them are as high as 50% and more than 20%.

00:17:28.523 --> 00:17:31.529
So combined there's a big, very big chance.

00:17:31.529 --> 00:17:33.320
And people ask you know, but why?

00:17:33.320 --> 00:17:35.567
You know, you know, you just have to do it right.

00:17:35.567 --> 00:17:43.768
But if you think about it, some of these things have 2000, 3000, 4000 panels on a roof, maybe even more.

00:17:43.768 --> 00:17:59.667
You know more than that and imagine the labor to put all of that together, that all those operations, all those connections, that there's not a faulty connection, that there's no poor workmanship or poor maintenance in all of this.

00:18:00.201 --> 00:18:21.869
I was about to ask, and the statistics take where into account, like because we will have a freshly new installations, which I would hope that they are absolutely perfect because they have just been built and commissioned, but you may also have like 10 years old installations that went through many harsh wind events, through many hailstorms, through many thunderstorms.

00:18:22.599 --> 00:18:26.270
I've heard, I mean information, read the information.

00:18:26.270 --> 00:18:42.710
Installations that are maybe a few years old and when there was a fire and people looked at it then they could see, you know if there was a poor cable quality that had been used, that there's already been quite weathered, discolorations of cables and weakening.

00:18:42.710 --> 00:18:47.250
That's if things haven't been installed well.

00:18:47.250 --> 00:18:52.651
You have movements due to wind, snow, load, things like this that can create a strain.

00:18:52.651 --> 00:18:57.907
So there, you know the main, there is a too high of a probability right now.

00:18:57.907 --> 00:19:11.651
So this, this is what we also go all to do, this nfpa 550, fire concepts 3, where we say we need to work on the consequence, we need to work on and on the probability frequency of the fires.

00:19:11.651 --> 00:19:18.230
So the frequency, you know, this is the ignition and aspects of that and that is too high.

00:19:18.309 --> 00:19:22.023
But we in the guideline we tone that down there.

00:19:22.023 --> 00:19:26.840
That's done a lot elsewhere and I'm also no electrical engineer, so.

00:19:26.840 --> 00:19:38.237
So the details of all of these things we defer to other places where people look there are german, you know, from vds and also from fire protection association.

00:19:38.237 --> 00:19:44.912
They have long things with pictures of all kinds of installations and all kinds of faults and errors people can do.

00:19:44.912 --> 00:19:55.330
And if we were going into that detail, I think we would lose the overview, the holistic part, which is the main aspect for us.

00:19:56.185 --> 00:19:59.469
One thing that I wonder how easy is it actually to ignite a PV panel?

00:19:59.469 --> 00:20:05.964
Like to ignite that the fire is is to some extent growing on that panel Like any DCc fold.

00:20:05.964 --> 00:20:09.144
Any arc is is enough to to set it ablaze.

00:20:09.705 --> 00:20:13.621
So this is important here, you know we're not igniting the panel.

00:20:13.621 --> 00:20:17.347
Ah, what is burning is normally what's below the panel.

00:20:17.347 --> 00:20:31.306
Yes, some of the panels you know you have classes of panels but a lot of people say, oh well, this is because you use this bad panel and you're not using glass, glass panel or this panel.

00:20:31.306 --> 00:20:50.931
But in most of the work jens did, we used even a metal plate and and we even in the experiment I mean where the first, very first approximation experiments I did back in den Denmark 10 years ago or so we actually just used some glass wool and we saw the same thing.

00:20:50.931 --> 00:21:04.628
Hence my former students said we knew the answer that it wasn't the panel that was the problem, it's the system, it's this Physics is the problem, the physics, the fire dynamics is the problem.

00:21:04.628 --> 00:21:07.406
So well, so we knew.

00:21:07.406 --> 00:21:12.569
So that's what we chased and that's what ended up with all these very nice papers.

00:21:12.569 --> 00:21:23.690
Also we have to commend he worked with some very good students Ben Jacobs, farah from IMFSC, where they were doing their master's theses.

00:21:23.690 --> 00:21:32.392
Working with Jens, we also had Ming Chang from also I'm a C student who recently completed his PhD now at Ghent University.

00:21:32.392 --> 00:21:35.644
So so we had also other people in in that work.

00:21:35.644 --> 00:21:39.070
Just to highlight that that contributed to the knowledge.

00:21:39.070 --> 00:21:40.784
But that's, you know, the focus.

00:21:40.784 --> 00:21:42.029
There was the fire dynamics.

00:21:42.029 --> 00:21:47.180
So if you move into, you know in the guideline, from the ignition where, yes, we, I think what the ignition, where, yes, we're igniting.

00:21:47.180 --> 00:21:53.673
What we're igniting is typically we're igniting the membrane in the experiments we do with CRIB.

00:21:53.673 --> 00:21:58.073
But some people have been, oh, why aren't you not using an arc?

00:21:58.073 --> 00:22:00.880
And the reason we're not using an arc?

00:22:00.880 --> 00:22:04.667
We have actually done the arc and gotten the same results.

00:22:04.667 --> 00:22:08.665
The wood curve is more repeatable and we get the same end result.

00:22:08.665 --> 00:22:16.749
And also, of course, working with high currents and voltages can imply some other risk assessments in a lab environment.

00:22:16.749 --> 00:22:28.067
And finally, we can see that when people say, oh, but are you sure you're not making it too big, well, empirically we see the fires on the roofs that we see in media.

00:22:28.067 --> 00:22:41.864
So whatever ignited them led to spread to a thousand panels, two thousand panels, so that we are spreading from one panel to another, is empirically shown time and time over in those rooftop fires.

00:22:41.864 --> 00:22:52.442
So we're not making an overly big crib, we're actually quite a small that ignites the membrane, creates this feedback system that is again shown with these nice figures.

00:22:52.595 --> 00:22:57.123
I, you know we have them recreated here, but they're figures made by Jens in his PhD.

00:22:57.123 --> 00:23:00.805
Again, the whole guideline, as you can see, is type sense.

00:23:00.805 --> 00:23:02.102
So all the figures.

00:23:02.102 --> 00:23:12.077
We have references to many other places where we've done it, but we wanted the uniform expression instead of copy and pasting and then using other figures.

00:23:12.077 --> 00:23:23.097
And it's the first time I've done that in the sense to have the luxury of working with the typesetter and getting everything uniform, because I, you know, I'm terrible with graphics myself.

00:23:23.097 --> 00:23:30.082
But so, instead of having this is the figure from this and it looks completely different than the figure from Canceleri.

00:23:30.082 --> 00:23:32.804
And here's the figure from Clean Energy Associates.

00:23:32.804 --> 00:23:34.623
And here's the figure from BRE.

00:23:34.623 --> 00:23:35.941
And here's the figure from there.

00:23:35.941 --> 00:23:40.946
We have the benefit of working with a very good typesetter that put this all together.

00:23:41.455 --> 00:23:46.500
Hence my comment on the good communication in the guide from the start, because it looks like it's done purposefully.

00:23:46.500 --> 00:23:49.523
So yeah, but let's go, let's go back to physics.

00:23:49.743 --> 00:23:51.417
Yeah, so then you know we ignite it.

00:23:51.417 --> 00:23:52.019
But you know.

00:23:52.019 --> 00:24:20.701
So we look at this figure in the guideline, figure six, where, if you do a woodgrip, so that you know, let's backtrack a bit when you build a roof you have some insulation typically, and then you have a roofing membrane and before PVs were put on roofs and European Commission told us that we need to put them on the roof, or you know, there's not just the European Commission saying many people want to do it because energy prices are costing an arm and a leg, as they say.

00:24:20.701 --> 00:24:31.944
So the tests have been done, that the roofing membranes, if you have a burning brand, if you have a small fire attack, they shouldn't spread the fire across there.

00:24:31.944 --> 00:24:36.747
So you have these roof tests with the T1, t2, t3, t4.

00:24:36.747 --> 00:24:41.266
Commonly, if you pass T2, you will also pass all the other ones.

00:24:41.266 --> 00:24:43.442
It's the one that's most stringent in that.

00:24:43.442 --> 00:24:48.292
So we show this that, yeah, we use the membrane, we use the builder.

00:24:48.313 --> 00:24:53.724
With a crib it doesn't show, but then you put the panel above it and then they have an edge.

00:24:53.724 --> 00:24:55.502
So you gather some small.

00:24:55.502 --> 00:25:01.900
There may be a little bit of combustible material on the panel, but you get the heat feedback.

00:25:01.900 --> 00:25:06.001
You get re-radiation you on the panel, but you get the heat feedback.

00:25:06.001 --> 00:25:06.424
You get re-radiation.

00:25:06.424 --> 00:25:07.755
You have a flame that extends also up against a slow panel.

00:25:07.755 --> 00:25:13.606
So you get a bigger flame area, a bigger radiating area, and that preheats the membrane.

00:25:13.606 --> 00:25:20.429
That is then releasing enough paralysis gases that you can have a thermal runaway.

00:25:20.429 --> 00:25:24.727
You have a progressive set of ignitions, which is fire spread.

00:25:25.375 --> 00:25:31.820
One thing to clarify, because I guess not every fire science listener is an expert on the roof construction.

00:25:31.820 --> 00:25:36.010
The membrane, the uppermost layer of the roof, is usually combustible.

00:25:36.010 --> 00:25:36.914
Right, that's over.

00:25:37.055 --> 00:25:38.757
So the membranes will pass the B roof test, which is a horizontal test.

00:25:38.757 --> 00:25:43.541
The membranes will pass the B roof test, which is a horizontal test.

00:25:43.541 --> 00:26:01.500
But if you test it vertically, as you would do in EN 13501 reaction to fire tests, you will test it vertically and these tests will then be classified typically as an E, you know, a flammable material.

00:26:01.500 --> 00:26:09.502
Yeah, so there's no, there's no surprise that they burn per se, but they're constructed that when they're put flat they don't spread flame.

00:26:09.502 --> 00:26:17.385
I think similar with carpets if you put the car particularly and ignite it at the bottom, many of those would burn.

00:26:17.385 --> 00:26:21.361
That don't really spread the fire while lying flat on the on.

00:26:21.642 --> 00:26:53.707
It's really interesting because you're taking, like technically, a solution that's certified, that's fit for the purpose the flame would not spread on that surface if it was just the roof and then you kind of change the setting, you know, because suddenly you put something over it which is also perhaps certified, perhaps even non-combustible If you and the ends have put a bunch of steel and then the wool on top of that, which is non-combustible by definition, and suddenly your B-roof approved membrane becomes a hazard.

00:26:53.707 --> 00:27:04.766
Precisely say that the intended use of that membrane has changed, because it was intended to use in an open air and now it's used under a roof as a part of a mini compartment.

00:27:04.766 --> 00:27:06.978
To be honest, exactly so.

00:27:07.019 --> 00:27:23.904
This is one of the main technical messages that we try to portray in the guideline is that because we change the fire dynamics, then we need to revisit the roof construction, because the ignition wasn't used to be a problem but now it is.

00:27:23.904 --> 00:27:25.663
So it leads to a change for aerodynamics.

00:27:25.663 --> 00:27:31.681
Hence we need to go to a roof construction and eventually maybe also have different firefighting provisions.

00:27:31.681 --> 00:27:40.105
But so when we go there it is a key point that you're saying that I don't think you know in that sense that a membrane is a culprit.

00:27:40.105 --> 00:27:41.657
It's not a panel, that's a go.

00:27:41.657 --> 00:27:42.902
I said that before.

00:27:43.001 --> 00:27:47.221
It's important to point out that it's not this or that or this, it's a system.

00:27:47.221 --> 00:27:49.445
We just changed the rules of the game.

00:27:49.445 --> 00:27:52.578
Take a, you know french open is going on.

00:27:52.578 --> 00:28:07.701
If we all of a sudden change the height of the net or the length of the of the playing field, or if we say shorten it even more, so they would miss the field all the time because they're programmed to hit this and that's sort of the same.

00:28:07.701 --> 00:28:15.664
It's not something you can say blame them for, and that's because you can see also in if we go to figure seven.

00:28:15.664 --> 00:28:17.608
But those are from experiments.

00:28:17.608 --> 00:28:36.325
We also did part of jens's master's thesis, actually, and others have done the same to show that if you spread under the panel, but when you get to the edge, it doesn't spread, because this was the target that the membrane was set up to test for.

00:28:36.855 --> 00:28:48.763
So once you're again underneath the clean sky and not having this radiation from the panel, the conditions are back to normal for the membrane because that that's what they were doing.

00:28:49.084 --> 00:29:03.584
So that's why we're saying you know that it's important to look at the system level of thing, because when we look at the ignition, we look at the components, we test the components, we test the, but a lot of that is not tested from fire.

00:29:03.584 --> 00:29:14.788
I mean, they're tested from fire safety or maybe not creating an arc or having some flame retardant in the cables and a small amount of combustible in the panel.

00:29:14.788 --> 00:29:25.934
But all of that, this is Senelec, this is electric regulation, and now we bring that in and go into the roof regulation.

00:29:25.934 --> 00:29:26.977
And now we bring that in and going to the roof.

00:29:26.977 --> 00:29:35.739
And a point that somebody is smart pointed out is now that we are requiring or are required in the eu to put pv systems on the roof, shouldn't we then have a test?

00:29:35.739 --> 00:29:41.416
Shouldn't we then have some regulations that include this as a part of the building?

00:29:41.416 --> 00:29:42.579
And there you go.

00:29:42.579 --> 00:29:50.284
And it's interesting because the BIPV, the building integrated, is a construction product and that's tested according to European standards.

00:29:50.284 --> 00:29:56.339
But for the system we're in now because it's building applied and where it gets.

00:29:56.440 --> 00:30:00.221
Then you said sloped roofs or even flat roof.

00:30:00.221 --> 00:30:15.662
If you were to do a building integrated photovoltaic on a flat roof, you would have to test it according to construction product regulations, you know, according to a building product, but if you lift it up a little bit, you go there by.

00:30:15.662 --> 00:30:15.942
You know.

00:30:15.942 --> 00:30:18.406
Similar with facades or a piece of oh, it's a rain screen.

00:30:18.406 --> 00:30:20.618
It's not part of the building, so it's like one of these.

00:30:20.618 --> 00:30:22.124
We know this is a problem.

00:30:22.124 --> 00:30:24.182
We've seen it in so many places before.

00:30:24.182 --> 00:30:26.242
The tests are not testing what they should.

00:30:26.242 --> 00:30:28.142
The test is currently wrong.

00:30:28.142 --> 00:30:30.060
We need to do something about it.

00:30:31.097 --> 00:30:54.115
When we get to the edge of discussions on why one should not put a green facade on their building, because we find it's kind of hazardous in the setting they want to, and if they don't take the argumentation but really want to do it, the discussion ends up on please define the wall, you know, because this is not the wall, this is a decoration I put on the wall.

00:30:54.476 --> 00:30:57.103
The wall is fire resistant and meets all the regulation.

00:30:57.103 --> 00:30:58.145
It's not spreading the fire.

00:30:58.145 --> 00:31:03.723
And then I just put a few plants on top of that, like there is no law that forbids me to decorate my wall.

00:31:03.723 --> 00:31:13.384
And this is kind of annoying because again, the same case as something that's certified for intended use, suddenly the use changes by the user.

00:31:13.384 --> 00:31:40.405
One thing if you mentioned the fire spread on the PV arrays, when you mean PV array you don't mean like one bay of PV panels, you mean the entirety of the roof that's discovered by PV panels, because the fire can jump between the smaller arrays, right that's also something when we get to say then the roof construction, or you know chapter three here, we know flat roof construction with PV systems, construction with PV systems.

00:31:40.747 --> 00:31:42.548
We talk about two things.

00:31:42.548 --> 00:31:54.103
You know you have retrofits, which is by far the most common, because we're not going to rebuild all of Europe because we have PV systems, we're going to use the roofs we have.

00:31:54.103 --> 00:32:00.519
But for new buildings it is somewhat easier because then you know we can build from scratch.

00:32:00.519 --> 00:32:01.078
It's the same.

00:32:01.078 --> 00:32:03.362
It's the same as for facades.

00:32:03.362 --> 00:32:14.006
When we renovate them, then we're dealing with some of the constraints of the past, potential errors of the past, and so you don't want to go into the facade.

00:32:14.006 --> 00:32:20.259
But then when you look at an array, an array is a set of panels and on the roof we have it.

00:32:20.380 --> 00:32:25.654
Even in table, two different insurance companies and guidelines.

00:32:25.654 --> 00:32:30.826
They say, oh, it should be 40 by 40, 45 by 45 is the max.

00:32:30.826 --> 00:32:34.945
And then you have to also have a separation between these.

00:32:34.945 --> 00:32:39.026
The separations are one or 1.2, two meters.

00:32:39.026 --> 00:32:51.134
But the reason fires show that those separation, separation distances, the way we build, are too small, because the fire spread, it gets big enough that it just sort of blows by like in a wildfire.

00:32:51.134 --> 00:32:57.778
You have a too small of a fire gate and then it just jumps across or there's a burning brand or whatever that's going.

00:32:58.057 --> 00:33:11.621
you have some wind and it just goes by that our gate I really wanted to ask you about that because you summarized the requirement of those other guidances and they see a separation between the arrays of 1.2 meter, 1 meter, 2 meters.

00:33:11.621 --> 00:33:21.700
It feels like more like an access gap, you know, a space of sufficiency so that a person with a set of tools can walk between them.

00:33:21.700 --> 00:33:26.205
It doesn't feel like something that would do a big difference in a fire intuitively.

00:33:26.205 --> 00:33:34.065
And seeing the fires, the images of the fires on the rooftops, you can see those flames extend for many meters.

00:33:34.065 --> 00:33:43.855
There's one guy down in BDS that gives you more than five meters and that sounds more like a fire meant separation between the arrays, exactly so.

00:33:44.036 --> 00:33:51.669
I think that's a research gap right now is to establish these distances or ways to do.

00:33:51.669 --> 00:33:59.729
Is it enough if you do a different type of covering there or do you put some sort of separation?

00:33:59.729 --> 00:34:02.301
But of course, as you point out, if you start building separations there, do you lose part of this.

00:34:02.301 --> 00:34:06.498
But of course, as you point out, if you start building separations there, do you lose part of this thing of.

00:34:06.498 --> 00:34:13.061
Well, I wanted to run a pallet there when I'm installing it and I have thousands of panel.

00:34:13.061 --> 00:34:21.501
You know, people are obviously operate with pallets and pallet trucks, or quite often at least, because they don't want to carry them one by one from the edge.

00:34:21.501 --> 00:34:26.329
So it becomes a practical manner too of how you build it up and maintenance.

00:34:26.329 --> 00:34:33.688
Well, if you have countries where you have snow load or other things, you want to be able to navigate between them.

00:34:33.688 --> 00:34:34.981
So I think you're right.

00:34:34.981 --> 00:34:38.244
The main driver for this has been to have some distance.

00:34:38.244 --> 00:34:47.809
But you can see that the VDS or CDS from Germany 2234, they say more than five meter.

00:34:48.394 --> 00:34:54.967
I think we didn't put the asterisk, or I think they have the asterisk, that it or engineering solution or something.

00:34:54.967 --> 00:35:05.864
If they could prove and then the size of the arrays, so you can see, are typically around 40 by 40 meters, and this is related to spraying distances for hoses.

00:35:05.864 --> 00:35:07.817
Okay, there there's.

00:35:07.817 --> 00:35:10.744
Actually was a fire not too long ago in the U S.

00:35:10.744 --> 00:35:27.083
To show this completely the the roof was covered all the way to the edge and, all you know, on three sides and the firefighters can only enter the roof from one side and then they're almost like they're on their phone because they're like we can't reach that and we can't.

00:35:27.083 --> 00:35:28.856
You know the burn, the roof has burned.

00:35:28.856 --> 00:35:30.101
We can't walk across it.

00:35:30.101 --> 00:35:32.934
We don't know the structural stability of the roof at this point.

00:35:33.336 --> 00:35:42.724
So they were spraying there and they reached maybe a third of the distance and it's kind of funny because you perhaps should, or they perhaps should, approach it more like an oil tank.

00:35:42.724 --> 00:35:56.585
You know where they have to drop the foam for a very, very long distance and they actually can do that, but it requires completely different equipment than from what you have you would have been using on a building firefighting.

00:35:57.936 --> 00:36:03.666
On the frontispiece again, the fire at the asco distribution center in norway.

00:36:03.666 --> 00:36:11.286
They use helicopters with the wildfire helicopters and dropping the big bags of water on it.

00:36:11.286 --> 00:36:14.478
Eventually, again, because there is a spread between fire.

00:36:14.478 --> 00:36:20.862
This was a big building fire, not just on the roof, they were inside the warehouse in in two big section.

00:36:20.862 --> 00:36:25.699
I think it was something like nine, nine thousand square meters involved in the fire.

00:36:25.699 --> 00:36:37.456
So they actually you, yeah approach it in in a different way there you probably can throw a fireball much further than water and perhaps I see you want to go to the fireballs.

00:36:37.637 --> 00:36:41.324
I'm not, I'm sure, not sure we're ready about it, but they are.

00:36:41.324 --> 00:36:46.217
They're quite quite something, quite something exactly, exactly, um.

00:36:46.518 --> 00:36:47.199
is there any?

00:36:47.199 --> 00:37:00.679
I know it's not in the, in the guidance, but is there any work, perhaps that you know, on using some fixed firefighting equipment in the vicinity like any type of extinguishing application?

00:37:00.679 --> 00:37:02.724
Perhaps water curtains will work?

00:37:03.244 --> 00:37:15.163
So there are now, as you see in the guideline, we talk about the roof construction and we get into quite much about the choice of what we call a mitigation layer.

00:37:15.163 --> 00:37:31.625
If you have a highly combustible I'm going to throw it out there you know a lot of the roofs have EPS and we have shown quite clearly that because of the change scenario with the buildup, that you will ignite the EPS in that situation.

00:37:31.625 --> 00:37:33.976
So you need a mitigation and that could be.

00:37:33.976 --> 00:37:37.126
There's many options for the mitigation layer.

00:37:37.126 --> 00:37:48.847
There's non-combustible, there's even hard roof, there's even you know, you can do metal plates, you could do insulation types, you can do different thicknesses of insulations that you, uh, you can do.

00:37:48.847 --> 00:37:50.378
You could do gypsum boards.

00:37:51.059 --> 00:38:03.190
In the end, there's many other constraints that will also play in for that, because I've heard a number, like in the uk, that there's 30 percent of the existing roof that can't even afford the weight of a glass, glass panel.

00:38:03.190 --> 00:38:06.201
Okay, that's, they're so lightweight construction.

00:38:06.201 --> 00:38:07.824
This is why you also may have the.

00:38:07.824 --> 00:38:13.005
You know they're very lean constructions so you're getting down to oh well, we cannot install this.

00:38:13.005 --> 00:38:15.940
So it comes down to what can you afford?

00:38:15.940 --> 00:38:19.913
You know how thick, or because it's a heat transfer problem in the end.

00:38:19.913 --> 00:38:26.300
So you're like, oh yeah, well, I'll just use a big thick this and that on top and nothing will happen.

00:38:26.521 --> 00:38:29.914
And and that could be good from an energy renovation perspective.

00:38:29.914 --> 00:38:37.639
You can do two things at once, that you improve the energy efficiency of the building at the same time as you're putting the the pv panel on top.

00:38:37.639 --> 00:38:38.740
But so you know.

00:38:38.740 --> 00:38:49.166
So we, we recommend or say that you have to do preferably a non-combustible insulation, but if you do use other solutions, that you should test them.

00:38:49.166 --> 00:38:51.139
Okay With the panel.

00:38:51.139 --> 00:38:52.496
Yeah, test.

00:38:52.496 --> 00:38:54.925
As you know, it's a system, so test it as built.

00:38:55.335 --> 00:38:58.425
Perform an engineering exercise and just see what happens.

00:38:59.096 --> 00:39:10.146
And if you can document that well, and maybe it's also down to the insurance company to say that they're comfortable with the solution, because there are no building regulations that demand one thing or another.

00:39:10.146 --> 00:39:19.789
So it will often be down to the insurance, which is why you can see a lot of the guidelines and the other documents we refer.

00:39:19.789 --> 00:39:27.239
You know, it's Alliance, axa, risk Control, risk Association, zurich, generali, fm, global.

00:39:27.239 --> 00:39:32.958
They're very active on this, which is again when people say, oh, why are you talking about this?

00:39:32.958 --> 00:39:39.465
It's not such a big problem and it's like well, I don't think the insurance companies are talking very much about things that are.

00:39:39.465 --> 00:39:45.360
You know, if they're very interested, I guess they have recognized that there is something that they want to do about it.

00:39:46.137 --> 00:39:53.103
I wonder to what extent the gap height is a solution, because from my interview with Jens, what stood out from his PhD?

00:39:53.103 --> 00:39:57.581
He was actually looking for a critical gap height, you know, after which nothing happened anymore.

00:39:57.581 --> 00:40:02.875
So I really I contemplate that whether perhaps putting them higher would not be a solution.

00:40:02.875 --> 00:40:09.985
But I guess this creates another dynamic with the wind yeah of course you do have these other constraints that come in.

00:40:10.516 --> 00:40:26.461
So Jens did a lot of testing with just flat, you know with the horizontal, and then we've also done other testing where we have like the classic installation, and then recently we we also done some testing with vertical panel.

00:40:26.461 --> 00:40:40.539
So it's not just like a one-way road because, unsurprisingly, if you have a vertical panel not much happened because you don't have a chain fire dynamics and they're non-combustible, so it doesn't change.

00:40:40.539 --> 00:41:03.302
But it's not like you go then to certain angles and it gets worse to the point where you go then to certain angles and it gets worse to the point where you go to the flat, because actually the flat is somewhat better than the angled one, and that has to do with when you have an angled one you have an easier flow route for recirculation, you have some buoyancy going up, you have a longer flame extension along the panel and then you get to you.

00:41:03.302 --> 00:41:05.387
We established some critical gap height.

00:41:05.387 --> 00:41:10.684
But there's very nice work and very nice scientific engineering result.

00:41:11.438 --> 00:41:15.762
The problem with it is that everybody then wanted to have a talk.

00:41:15.762 --> 00:41:16.364
What is it?

00:41:16.364 --> 00:41:17.862
Is it 11 centimeter?

00:41:17.862 --> 00:41:19.762
Is it 12 centimeter?

00:41:19.762 --> 00:41:21.485
And it's the system.

00:41:21.485 --> 00:41:22.434
Again, it's the system.

00:41:22.434 --> 00:41:23.699
It depends on?

00:41:23.699 --> 00:41:25.516
Which type of membrane do you have?

00:41:25.516 --> 00:41:27.400
Which type of panel you have?

00:41:27.400 --> 00:41:27.963
Which type?

00:41:28.023 --> 00:41:29.746
of crib you put in underneath it.

00:41:29.746 --> 00:41:31.878
Is it like seven kilos?

00:41:32.157 --> 00:41:33.099
or how big.

00:41:33.099 --> 00:41:37.007
If you put a bigger crib then maybe it's for you.

00:41:37.007 --> 00:41:44.148
So some people wanted to have the quick answer and that's where you know we have to disappoint people a little bit.

00:41:44.148 --> 00:41:46.701
I'm sorry it is not a quick answer.

00:41:46.701 --> 00:41:58.161
I guess you've done that with the green facades, but also all of the work you have done with the car park and ventilation and so on, where I'm sure people say so how big of a ventilation system do I need?

00:41:58.282 --> 00:42:04.302
or or which car park will work what height of this then and you're like, yeah well, it's higher.

00:42:04.302 --> 00:42:07.257
Yeah well, they can tell you higher with good certainty.

00:42:07.257 --> 00:42:10.724
But or as I often end up saying, it depends.

00:42:10.724 --> 00:42:13.552
But it's a case by case.

00:42:13.552 --> 00:42:15.876
It is engineering that is needed.

00:42:15.876 --> 00:42:21.748
It is not something you can take off, just the shelf solution, I say, but that's a.

00:42:21.855 --> 00:42:29.784
You know, when people have said what we we're getting, to some extent we're getting to the firefighting and maintenance and some of these things that we also discuss.

00:42:29.784 --> 00:42:44.608
But on this thing people have said what's next in terms of research and the fire dynamics, the ignition, one of the things that, after the work that Jens did, he focused mostly with PVC membranes.

00:42:44.608 --> 00:42:46.469
There's a lot of different membranes.

00:42:46.469 --> 00:43:07.335
So we're trying testing the different membranes, also getting nuances of the different panels, but basically also trying to really look at, maybe through testing, also get some solutions that we know work, because we, you know we're going to have this unprecedented change of the roofs in Europe and around the world.

00:43:07.335 --> 00:43:13.858
They don't have to per se, but it's the natural driving thing because it is a good solution in most asp.

00:43:13.858 --> 00:43:21.242
So we need to, you know, if we can have a couple of work solutions that we say, if you build it like this, you'll be fine, it may.

00:43:21.242 --> 00:43:24.697
And then people say, well, but that doesn't work for me because of these and these constraints.

00:43:24.717 --> 00:43:52.561
Like well, then test something, tell us those constraints, we can test it and we can meet your requirements for that I think the fire science is more and more growing into a science of it depends, as the complexity of the problems that we are touching and dealing with became insane, and especially that it's not just our objectives, you know, because the easiest, sometimes easiest, is to remove someone's else objective, you know, turn something into non-combustible.

00:43:52.561 --> 00:44:04.827
The membranes are combustible for a reason because they're damn good waterproofing materials and it's hard to find a non-combustible waterproofing material that creates matrix as good as PVC or vitamin.

00:44:04.827 --> 00:44:07.655
So there are reasons for those things to be combustible.

00:44:07.655 --> 00:44:09.963
It's our job to figure out.

00:44:10.335 --> 00:44:21.179
Yeah, I mean because either because, you know, as a simple engineer as myself, I talk with some people and say, oh well, maybe we can have like a membrane that's for pv.

00:44:21.179 --> 00:44:49.463
Uh, when you have pv and and the membranes that are like we have them now, that have been perfected for 25 year, whatever lifetime, or and you know all of the conditions that the membrane should do, and they're like, that's very, very difficult because you know it comes down to changing chemical compositions, uh and so on, and and they, they know the constraints with all the these products, they know which uh parameters to choose.

00:44:49.463 --> 00:44:54.427
So that's why we need to when we talk again about, you know, a mitigation layer.

00:44:54.427 --> 00:45:03.164
And I realized I was just at a conference in the Netherlands, at the NIPV, and one question was so what is a mitigation layer?

00:45:03.164 --> 00:45:05.663
I said I need to explain that better.

00:45:05.663 --> 00:45:07.282
So what is a mitigation layer?

00:45:07.282 --> 00:45:14.289
I said, well, it is what you have between the membrane and and whatever you have below.

00:45:14.309 --> 00:45:52.407
You know it could be many different things, but if you have, so you only have a mitigation layer if you have, well, for the most part, if you have an existing construction with, say, highly flammable insulation material and again I'm going to say it's eps, and that's when you you really need the mitigation here and and it can be many, many ways to do that, so you can look it up there's many, many suggestions for how to do that, because it is getting recognition that, yes, the fire will spread across the membrane, but we want to protect the assets which is the building below.

00:45:53.034 --> 00:45:59.568
Quite a few people can tolerate that you burn some panels and you burn some membrane.

00:45:59.568 --> 00:46:02.681
That's actually reasonably easy to deal with.

00:46:02.681 --> 00:46:10.088
But what we need to understand is what brings the difference of that being a small nuance to that being a big loss in the building.

00:46:10.088 --> 00:46:13.599
Because, as you mentioned, the membranes function well.

00:46:13.599 --> 00:46:16.289
The membrane one of the big thing is to keep water out.

00:46:16.289 --> 00:46:31.682
If the membrane is burned and you start throwing water on the building uh many situations you have a lot of water entering where it's not intended to come you've segued me to important point, because the last part of your guidance is is related to firefighting.

00:46:36.554 --> 00:46:38.657
So why did engineers look into firefighting and what did the engineers find in that?

00:46:38.657 --> 00:46:39.958
The main thing is to I mean it goes in.

00:46:39.958 --> 00:46:52.452
The most quoted firefighter in the world recently is from the Copenhagen Fire Brigade, Jakob, where he said at the SFP conference after the big fire at Burson's like don't make our lives more complicated.

00:46:52.452 --> 00:47:09.764
You know the firefighting fires is very complex, very challenging to begin with, and that's why, when we go for the firefighting for the roofs, we you know safe rooftop access, safe operations while on the roof and then a successful application of extinguishing medium.

00:47:09.764 --> 00:47:11.362
You know that they could do that.

00:47:11.362 --> 00:47:15.501
And then you can retract and say you know that they could do that, and then you can retract and say, oh, how can we do that?

00:47:15.501 --> 00:47:21.380
Well, so some of the things are related to don't put pv panels across the entire roofing surface.

00:47:21.380 --> 00:47:28.719
They should be able to enter the room from any of the four sides of a building and they should be able to walk around.

00:47:28.719 --> 00:47:52.077
In terms of safe operations, people also, you know it's related to shutoffs or de-energizing the panel, Different ways to do that, and whether it's active application of a medium or whether it's main switches that you turn on and then you have extinguishing medium and that's a selection to what is most effective to do, and that's a selection to what is most effective to do.

00:47:52.077 --> 00:47:58.188
But if we backtrack because this is something I didn't get to before you ask it, do we have any fixed systems?

00:47:58.655 --> 00:48:06.349
So one of the quite challenges now for firefighters, I would say it's very manual detection.

00:48:06.349 --> 00:48:10.365
So detection is somebody seeing a big plume in the sky?

00:48:10.365 --> 00:48:14.581
Detection, is somebody seeing a big plume in the sky three kilometers away?

00:48:14.581 --> 00:48:17.469
They see it's a fire, but inside the building they may be unaware that the building is on fire.

00:48:17.469 --> 00:48:20.336
And and then you know that there's posting on.

00:48:20.336 --> 00:48:24.025
Linkedin will get you all the solutions in the world.

00:48:24.025 --> 00:48:27.938
Uh, so so you know there could be, you know cameras.

00:48:27.938 --> 00:48:37.545
There's the drones, there's the monitoring of the performance of the system, there's linear line detectors, there's the flame detectors nothing new.

00:48:37.545 --> 00:48:49.188
All of the systems we know that exist and work in other places and that, of course, with an earlier detection, earlier alarm, maybe the fire can even be dealt by trained personnel on site.

00:48:49.956 --> 00:48:58.864
In a big warehouse you will typically have staff that are building superintendents and they can have training to deal with this.

00:48:58.864 --> 00:49:05.164
And I've heard that maybe the ones with the really big warehouses and so on will deal with that.

00:49:05.164 --> 00:49:23.969
And then you also have I've heard you know there are some developments for extinguishing systems and that I think will be, you know, a cost benefit type of interest, Because if you have four panels on your home, a little cottage, I'm not sure you want to necessarily invest in it.

00:49:23.969 --> 00:49:41.478
But if you're a big warehouse with 10,000 panels and a billion at risk, if something happens happens, maybe consider actually that the insurance company may, may say that is something that they require, and of course, then you should also focus, as is where we end up is.

00:49:41.898 --> 00:49:51.326
You need to work on the maintenance and you need to, you know like, because the maintenance will reduce the probability of this and also the consequences.

00:49:51.326 --> 00:50:03.146
There's bird's nests that can be growing up, there's poor connections, there's panels that have been moved, you know rodents going One of my favorites actually, recently I heard in the US.

00:50:03.146 --> 00:50:06.143
You also need to look at bullet holes on the roofs.

00:50:06.143 --> 00:50:20.768
Yeah, well, because apparently on the 4th of July and other celebrations, people shoot guns and the bullet needs to land somewhere, and if you have a warehouse that is eight or ten football fields big, you know that very big landing area.

00:50:20.768 --> 00:50:26.146
So apparently it's not so uncommon to have bullet holes on warehouse roofs in the US.

00:50:26.547 --> 00:50:38.987
That's interesting yeah well, if you think about it, they have to fall somewhere, right, it's not that they're going to an orbit, and I guess, well, the same would be even, to some extent, to hailstorms which we would have in here.

00:50:38.987 --> 00:50:54.016
More common end of the document as well, in this talk.

00:50:54.016 --> 00:50:54.557
So, uh, it's not a long read.

00:50:54.557 --> 00:50:55.740
Where should people find it to to take a look at it?

00:50:55.760 --> 00:51:12.987
because it's, it's a, it's a good piece of communication well, thank you, we put it on the frisbee website, the project that I'm leading here in slovenia, the fire safe, sustainable built environment eu funded project and we put it on our I think it's under the news.

00:51:12.987 --> 00:51:21.556
Uh, you will put a direct link, well, to the page but we can also directly exactly just a right link to the pdf document.

00:51:22.117 --> 00:51:33.768
I've also, you know, linkedin the tough to find, but I have published it on linkedin as well, where you can just click on the document there and people can take it from there.

00:51:33.768 --> 00:51:39.867
And for those that can't figure out of those, then they end up emailing me or you to find it.

00:51:39.867 --> 00:51:41.418
Then we will direct them.

00:51:41.418 --> 00:51:45.186
Just to recap also, you know we have the so Ignition.

00:51:45.186 --> 00:51:48.061
So there's installation quality products.

00:51:48.061 --> 00:51:56.501
There are things also that you can install to minimize it, to protect the arcing or monitoring direct physical systems that you can use.

00:51:56.501 --> 00:52:03.864
Then you have the fire dynamics and then the route buildup that you need to take care of and the maintenance and the firefight.

00:52:03.864 --> 00:52:13.092
So it's a balance of all of them that there are options, many options in all, and I don't think there's one thing that can solve everything.

00:52:13.092 --> 00:52:14.436
It's a combined effort.

00:52:14.836 --> 00:52:43.579
But what we do say is that, from a general fire perspective, to say that we will never have any ignition, that's, I think, been proven in fire science that that is a wrong assumption or a very risky assumption to take, and that's why we recommend to have a robust system that can handle a fire in the case and deliver an outcome that you can live with instead of facing big consequences.

00:52:43.579 --> 00:53:00.882
The nuance is that it's very, very little, which is why it required this very careful engineering, interaction by knowledgeable people, because you have a fire like the we Are the Curious in Bristol that museum that was in 2022.

00:53:00.882 --> 00:53:18.425
It's more than two years and it's about to open this summer and you have I've used in the talk and I think I will do in the talk tomorrow when I do the webinar If we look at two fires that, from the outlook, look pretty similar, one is a total loss and the other one opened a few days later.

00:53:18.425 --> 00:53:26.695
So there's nuances and people may say, oh, that was lucky, it's resilience, that is resilience.

00:53:26.795 --> 00:53:33.333
Yeah, it's resilience and it's quite positive base because people know what they're doing To a great extent.

00:53:34.056 --> 00:53:37.867
I think that's a very strong point to finish on.

00:53:37.867 --> 00:53:40.041
I'll put the links into the show notes.

00:53:40.041 --> 00:53:41.184
Good luck with your webinar.

00:53:41.184 --> 00:53:44.865
I guess it'll still be accessible whenever people like, on the Frisbee website.

00:53:44.865 --> 00:53:55.159
So, yeah, all the best, man with the guidelines and looking forward to another sustainability oriented materials coming out from frisbee.

00:53:55.199 --> 00:54:05.347
Appreciate that a lot, man cheers thank you uh in a pleasure to be here, and I uh look forward to seeing you for our summer school in our world.

00:54:05.367 --> 00:54:06.956
That's gonna be fun, remember.

00:54:07.277 --> 00:54:11.686
We'll hear more about that later, but but I'll keep throwing it out Perfect.

00:54:11.726 --> 00:54:12.206
Thanks, man.

00:54:12.206 --> 00:54:16.804
All right, this essay of mine has clearly a lot of small things to say.

00:54:16.804 --> 00:54:20.405
Thank you, Grunde, for sharing your insights on PVs with us.

00:54:20.405 --> 00:54:22.762
Hard for me to summarize it even further.

00:54:22.762 --> 00:54:26.987
You took that role from me in the end of the episode, for which I am grateful.

00:54:26.987 --> 00:54:32.425
If people like communications like this, well, perhaps in a different forum.

00:54:32.425 --> 00:54:36.682
Grund also has his new project, the newsletter called the burning matters.

00:54:36.682 --> 00:54:51.244
There's, of course, a link in the show notes, and if you sign there every week, you're gonna get a new dose of interesting fire science, perhaps not in the podcast version, but also in a very accessible and nice format.

00:54:51.244 --> 00:54:53.208
So good job on that, sensei.

00:54:53.208 --> 00:54:55.217
That's something I don't have yet.

00:54:55.217 --> 00:54:57.021
Perhaps I should one day, who knows?

00:54:57.021 --> 00:54:59.327
Anyway, back to the content.

00:55:00.014 --> 00:55:04.528
This episode once again highlighted the role of systematic thinking.

00:55:04.528 --> 00:55:06.454
It's not PV that's an issue.

00:55:06.454 --> 00:55:09.123
It's not the building roof membrane that's the issue.

00:55:09.123 --> 00:55:11.150
It's the combination of both.

00:55:11.150 --> 00:55:15.501
It's the way how PV panels change the intended use of your roof.

00:55:15.501 --> 00:55:25.108
Even though you may not realize that, even though that the testing regime does not account for that, even though that it seems trivial, but yet it does.

00:55:25.108 --> 00:55:32.442
It does significantly and imposes a ton of challenges for the building, for the firefighters, for their insurers, for the owners.

00:55:32.442 --> 00:55:39.989
We have to take that into account and great that resources like the one presented today exist that help us do the job.

00:55:39.989 --> 00:55:42.079
There's not much more to add.

00:55:42.079 --> 00:55:55.442
You really should read up that short guideline, because it simply covers most of the stuff that you need to know about PVs, and if you need more knowledge, there are links and references to more detailed guidelines out there.

00:55:55.442 --> 00:55:57.264
So a great starting point.

00:55:57.264 --> 00:56:02.583
If you have to deal with PV installations as a fire safety engineer, I would definitely start there.

00:56:02.583 --> 00:56:18.114
And yeah, that's it for today's episode Once again, where I'm still in the mood of celebrating the third birthday of the podcast, still extremely happy that I am still here with you, and I will be here with you next Wednesday.

00:56:18.695 --> 00:56:20.516
I hope you will be there with me as well.

00:56:20.516 --> 00:56:21.358
See you there.

00:56:21.358 --> 00:56:22.338
Thank you bye.

00:56:22.338 --> 00:56:35.871
This was the Fire Science Show.

00:56:35.871 --> 00:56:38.239
Thank you for listening and see you soon.