Transcript
WEBVTT
00:00:01.060 --> 00:00:02.708
Hello everybody, welcome to the Fire Science Show.
00:00:02.708 --> 00:00:12.912
In this episode we're gonna try and answer a very difficult question what is the Wii problem and what are the pathways to its solution?
00:00:12.912 --> 00:00:19.112
That's actually a hell of a question, but I have a really good guest with me in this episode to help me answer that.
00:00:19.112 --> 00:00:27.649
Both are from NFPA, that's Birgitta Messerschmidt and Michelle Steinberg, and they're both passionately dealing with a wee problem.
00:00:27.649 --> 00:00:30.730
You can read their columns in the NFPA journal.
00:00:30.730 --> 00:00:32.807
You can listen to them at NFPA podcast sometimes.
00:00:32.807 --> 00:00:49.951
Anyway, I brought them here to the Fire Science Show because I hope that together we will be able to put a holistic bird's eye view on the issue of the wee problem, wild and urban interface, and I had a lot of scientific talks about the WE in the podcast so far.
00:00:49.951 --> 00:01:13.453
So we've talked about how the forest burns, what are the variables that influence that fire, but we've not discussed that much on the community or the building or the fire protection side, on how those communities can be prepared and buildings protected, and here we're not talking particular solutions but more like an ecosystem aspect of it.
00:01:13.453 --> 00:01:23.144
What makes people do safe homes, why they do not invest in that, how to build the regulations to allow for that.
00:01:23.144 --> 00:01:31.769
What are we lacking in terms of the testing regime and, yeah, as I said in the very first sentence, what the Wii problem actually really is.
00:01:31.769 --> 00:01:37.810
So a bunch of really good questions and even more great answers in this episode.
00:01:37.810 --> 00:01:46.600
And this episode also serves to convince you, my fellow FICEFT engineers, to convince you that there's future in we for all of us.
00:01:46.600 --> 00:01:56.754
And if you don't like it, that's fine, but I truly believe the future will arrive, no matter our feelings, and I think we should all get educated on we.
00:01:56.754 --> 00:02:12.917
It's a difficult subject, complicated subject, so I really hope resources like podcasts and interviews like this one can bring you up at speed to the best knowledge you can have on this issue, which will be highly, highly relevant in the future.
00:02:12.917 --> 00:02:18.012
Anyway, I think that's it for introducing you to the subject.
00:02:18.012 --> 00:02:21.210
I guess you need to hear it from Michel and Birgitta.
00:02:21.210 --> 00:02:24.180
So let's spin the intro and jump into the episode.
00:02:24.180 --> 00:02:29.383
Michelle and Birgitta, so let's spin the intro and jump into the episode.
00:02:29.383 --> 00:02:31.044
Welcome to the Firesize Show.
00:02:31.044 --> 00:02:34.506
My name is Wojciech Wigrzyński and I will be your host.
00:02:50.836 --> 00:02:53.997
This podcast is brought to you in collaboration with OFR Consultants.
00:02:53.997 --> 00:02:57.963
Ofr is the UK's leading fire risk consultancy.
00:02:57.963 --> 00:03:07.812
Its globally established team has developed a reputation for preeminent fire engineering expertise, with colleagues working across the world to help protect people, property and environment.
00:03:07.812 --> 00:03:23.586
Established in the UK in 2016 as a startup business of two highly experienced fire engineering consultants, the business has grown phenomenally in just seven years, with offices across the country in seven locations, from Edinburgh to Bath, and now employing more than 100 professionals.
00:03:23.586 --> 00:03:35.227
Colleagues are on a mission to continually explore the challenges that fire creates for clients and society, applying the best research experience and diligence for effective, tailored fire safety solutions.
00:03:35.227 --> 00:03:42.939
In 2024, ofr will grow its team once more and is always keen to hear from industry professionals.
00:03:42.939 --> 00:03:48.867
Who would like to collaborate on fire safety futures this year, get in touch at OFRconsultantscom.
00:03:48.867 --> 00:03:51.627
Hello everybody, welcome to the Fire Science Show.
00:03:51.627 --> 00:03:55.189
I am here today joined by Birgit Messerschmidt.
00:03:55.189 --> 00:03:56.506
Hello Birgit, welcome back to the show.
00:03:57.000 --> 00:03:58.479
Thanks for having me back again, Wojciech.
00:03:58.861 --> 00:04:03.188
You're very, very welcome and Michelle Steinberg, hello for the first time.
00:04:03.188 --> 00:04:05.385
Welcome, yes, thank you, glad to be here.
00:04:05.385 --> 00:04:11.832
And you both are representing NFPA and I'm really, really happy to guest you both in the show.
00:04:11.832 --> 00:04:20.086
We will be talking about things related to Wildland, urban Interface, wii Fires, so I'll drop a bump on you first.
00:04:20.086 --> 00:04:20.928
How do you define WII?
00:04:21.779 --> 00:04:22.021
Right.
00:04:22.021 --> 00:04:29.033
So we have been trying to define this wildland urban interface for at least 50 years and nobody can agree.
00:04:29.033 --> 00:04:37.064
Recently some fire protection engineers in the US gave a presentation called what is the WUI and it was fascinating.
00:04:37.064 --> 00:04:39.928
It was at our NFPA's annual conference a few weeks ago.
00:04:39.928 --> 00:04:45.641
People came in thinking they knew what it was and walked out thinking I don't know what it was and walked out thinking I don't know what it is.
00:04:45.661 --> 00:05:03.033
The point is, what we're trying to describe is a problem of homes igniting during wildfires and in fact not just a building but multiple buildings, whole communities, and we're trying to describe it in a way that defies kind of the scientific logic of it, if that makes any sense.
00:05:03.033 --> 00:05:04.654
So we're trying to draw a line.
00:05:04.654 --> 00:05:09.358
When you say interface that you assume there's sort of a line or a barrier or boundary.
00:05:09.358 --> 00:05:12.411
That is a nice neat definition for a very messy problem.
00:05:12.411 --> 00:05:16.564
The messiness comes when we're talking about what is causing the fire.
00:05:16.564 --> 00:05:19.730
So that wild land word gets in there.
00:05:19.730 --> 00:05:33.045
You can argue and I live in the Northeast of the US where many friends have told me we do not have wild land in this region which I'd argue yes, you do, but they see this.
00:05:33.045 --> 00:05:34.329
What is even wild land.
00:05:34.329 --> 00:05:36.047
We don't understand what that means, first of all.
00:05:36.047 --> 00:05:42.848
And then urban also has its own connotations of a city and people think well, cities don't burn down from wildfires.
00:05:42.848 --> 00:05:43.821
So what are you talking about?
00:05:43.821 --> 00:05:58.569
What I guess we're trying to get at is the exterior exposure from vegetative fuels to buildings, and typically what we find in the US is the residential buildings are the ones that primarily are the ones that are at risk, primarily the ones that burn.
00:05:58.569 --> 00:06:03.192
It doesn't mean that our commercial buildings are so well built.
00:06:03.192 --> 00:06:12.017
It just means there's a lot more houses than there are anything else and they've built in ways that make them very, very vulnerable to the exterior exposure from a wildfire.
00:06:12.600 --> 00:06:15.930
Even the word wildfire has its own set of definitions.
00:06:16.100 --> 00:06:25.880
But the presentation and why people get so confused is when we go beyond the sort of the why are things burning, how are things burning, which is our sort of scientific question.
00:06:26.281 --> 00:06:52.543
We get into politics, which is oh, if I'm defined, if my home or my community is defined as being in the wild and urban interface or in the WUI, then I either have to meet some kind of standard or I'm going to get higher insurance rates because I'm seen as higher risk or something bad is going to happen to me, as opposed to somebody who's not there thinking well, I have no risk from this problem because I'm not in the WUI.
00:06:52.543 --> 00:06:56.482
And we find over and over again that those definitions don't make sense in real life.
00:06:56.482 --> 00:07:09.211
And now, ironically, because our government is putting a lot more money into trying to protect homes and communities at risk, now people want to be in the WUI so they can get grants and they can get help, etc.
00:07:09.211 --> 00:07:10.074
Etc.
00:07:10.074 --> 00:07:18.026
So it's really ironic that we have people running away from and towards this definition.
00:07:18.026 --> 00:07:21.096
That in and of itself is not very helpful to describe what the problem is.
00:07:21.519 --> 00:07:26.709
But it's not just an area, it's not that you have a map, you know the boundary of the forest.
00:07:26.709 --> 00:07:45.774
You take a sharpie and draw a line five kilometers or five miles further, and on the left it's we, on the right it's not, because in many cases, like in your column, you wrote about the fire, the top spire, where it arguably destroyed 1,400 homes that were not even in a vegetated area right.
00:07:45.774 --> 00:07:52.728
So it's more like where the fire began and what it can danger.
00:07:52.728 --> 00:07:54.130
Is that the correct way?
00:07:54.130 --> 00:07:59.487
I mean, if you put it like that, it becomes a metaphorical problem, like what it is.
00:07:59.887 --> 00:08:00.108
Right.
00:08:00.108 --> 00:08:06.771
So the typical aerial map does not help us at all in this situation because it's trying to draw that line or boundary.
00:08:06.771 --> 00:08:16.146
I actually came out of professionally speaking floodplain management and so we have the infamous floodplain maps, the so-called 100-year flood maps that are.
00:08:16.146 --> 00:08:22.516
You know you draw the line and you know you could use some 3D modeling to communicate that better.
00:08:22.516 --> 00:08:26.343
But you more or less understand where you're going to have inundation.
00:08:27.125 --> 00:08:38.826
It's so much harder to deal with fire on this level of understanding how it's going to impact structures and where the actual risk of ignition is, because you have wind, because you have fuels that you move from.
00:08:38.826 --> 00:09:04.953
Let's say you've got a wildfire coming through vegetation, you get embers into the mulch next to your house or the shrub or the flatbed of a pickup truck that's parked next to a house and these all become fuel for the fire that is ultimately going to take the community down and you think, well, that's not a wildfire anymore, because if it's in the mulch and it's on the deck or it's in the pickup truck, those aren't wild lands, those are objects, common objects, around our homes and our yards.
00:09:04.953 --> 00:09:07.966
Or it's in the pickup truck, those aren't wild lands, those are objects, common objects around our homes and our yards.
00:09:07.966 --> 00:09:38.023
So it's super confusing to try to draw this line and the way we've tried to explain this to property owners, and that's the thing I think I'm looking forward to talking more about sort of the fire protection engineering role here, because we're trying to tell people who are already built in a highly hazardous situation with materials that aren't going to withstand this fire, we're trying to tell them, who are already built in a highly hazardous situation with materials that aren't going to withstand this fire, we're trying to tell them to do what they can do and what we know they can do and what they can control is the fuel which starts with their house and out to the extent of their property.
00:09:38.202 --> 00:09:41.879
That's what they have control over usually, and they can't control the wind.
00:09:41.879 --> 00:09:47.841
They can't control the national forest you know a mile down the road they can control what does my roof look like?
00:09:47.841 --> 00:09:50.682
What does the vegetation look like right around my house?
00:09:50.682 --> 00:09:59.966
What are the other things that could catch embers that I can modify so that when we have this inevitable fire coming, there's things I can do to prevent my home igniting.
00:09:59.966 --> 00:10:01.986
So that's getting down to that micro level.
00:10:01.986 --> 00:10:03.028
And then, oh, by the way.
00:10:03.028 --> 00:10:13.172
If my neighbor's closer than about 100 feet, I have to worry about them, and so we start to get people to work with their neighbors to reduce those potential fuel sources for ignition to homes.
00:10:13.172 --> 00:10:24.875
So just telling people look at a line on a map does nothing for them, and I have innumerable cases of homes within a city limit that burn, that people freak out because they couldn't understand.
00:10:24.875 --> 00:10:26.817
Well, they're not in the WUI, so how did that happen?
00:10:26.817 --> 00:10:28.856
The fire doesn't really care about the map.
00:10:29.437 --> 00:10:33.019
So Michel said that we have variables that we can control and that's perhaps a building.
00:10:33.019 --> 00:10:39.261
From your perspective.
00:10:39.261 --> 00:10:42.580
Having trouble to define this WUI, does it create challenges in defining how the building should be built or what materials should be used in that?
00:10:42.580 --> 00:10:50.909
How do you approach that problem and do you see light in the tunnel to solve it actually, or we really need to wait until they figure out the definition?
00:10:51.671 --> 00:11:09.025
Yeah, to start there, I think the problem actually lies in the word wildland, because people then immediately think big forest somewhere on the west coast of the United States and not looking out their window into the beautiful yard and trees and so on in the small town.
00:11:09.025 --> 00:11:15.068
I think actually, when I think about how ISO TT92 is addressing it, calling it large outdoor fires.
00:11:15.089 --> 00:11:15.770
Okay, yeah.
00:11:16.461 --> 00:11:20.806
It is a pretty good idea, because Outdoor is a nice word, yeah.
00:11:20.960 --> 00:11:40.772
Exactly, because what is the challenge here is that we are seeing an exposure from the outside and we have built all of our homes whether it's the wild and urban interface, suburbia, wherever else all the requirements we have to our homes are based on fire starts within the home.
00:11:41.221 --> 00:11:43.788
They're based on a fire starting in the corner in a room.
00:11:43.788 --> 00:11:51.173
If we go back to the good old SBI test, et cetera, and then how that we want to prevent that fire from growing big.
00:11:51.173 --> 00:11:59.648
We don't want it to then impinge on the neighboring building, et cetera, et cetera, here we have a completely different fire scenario.
00:11:59.648 --> 00:12:11.340
We have the fire coming from the outside, as Michelle was pointing to, the embers coming in igniting things around your building and then starting fire exposure directly on the outside.
00:12:11.340 --> 00:12:28.846
I don't think you will find any regulations around the world that has a requirement to fire spread and fire resistance on a regular suburban home if it's not considered the wildland, and that is a problem.
00:12:28.846 --> 00:12:37.850
We have to go away from only thinking of fire as starting from within and thinking of fire starting from the outside as well.
00:12:38.962 --> 00:12:48.312
I liked what Brigitte had to say about the outdoor fires and that outdoor exposure Because if you think about, you know my other background besides floodplain management is urban planning.
00:12:48.312 --> 00:13:03.004
And when you think about zoning and planning in the United States, zoning started from cases where businesses would just build these highly hazardous factories and things right in the middle and just people would be living around this.
00:13:03.004 --> 00:13:14.740
Seattle, for example, burned down because some guy was you know, everything's built out of wood and some guy is boiling glue or something, and the fire gets away and it goes everywhere and it burns the whole city down.
00:13:14.740 --> 00:13:24.145
So you have these terrible, noxious, fire-prone uses happening next to homes and next to other things that you really shouldn't have fire around.
00:13:24.145 --> 00:13:25.928
And that's when zoning starts.
00:13:25.928 --> 00:13:32.572
It says no, we're going to zone this for residential use, and that means you can't have crazy stuff in the middle of the residential area.
00:13:32.572 --> 00:13:35.710
We're going to put the factories over here, we're going to put the farms over here.
00:13:35.710 --> 00:13:41.890
So you're kind of drawing out like trying to have a measure of safety, but it comes from an exterior exposure to fire.
00:13:41.890 --> 00:13:42.932
That's our history.
00:13:42.932 --> 00:13:53.053
We had cities burning down for decades at the turn of the century from bad planning and zoning and also no firefighting infrastructure.
00:13:53.053 --> 00:13:54.243
And we've solved that.
00:13:54.243 --> 00:13:56.528
We've solved that with fire protection engineering.
00:13:56.528 --> 00:13:59.466
We've solved that with zoning and planning, and now with wildfire.
00:14:00.148 --> 00:14:04.484
If you go to certain states that don't like regulation, plan is a four-letter word.
00:14:04.484 --> 00:14:06.326
Zoning is bad, but it's.
00:14:06.326 --> 00:14:10.553
Do you really want to be putting your homes next to the glue factory?
00:14:10.553 --> 00:14:15.051
No, people see nature and they say, oh nature, it's a beautiful day.
00:14:15.051 --> 00:14:16.986
We take a picture and that's how it is.
00:14:16.986 --> 00:14:20.470
And what they don't realize is no, nature needs fire.
00:14:20.470 --> 00:14:22.086
This is a fiery landscape.
00:14:22.086 --> 00:14:23.684
Fire is going to come to it.
00:14:25.580 --> 00:14:34.187
You need to understand what you're living next to and that's been very, very difficult because, again, glue factory, you can pretty much guarantee you're going to have a pretty high frequency of fires.
00:14:34.187 --> 00:14:43.198
Forest has its own fire ecosystem, fire return interval, and that's way longer than most people think about.
00:14:43.198 --> 00:14:47.990
It could be a 20-year interval, it could be a 20-year interval, it could be a 50-year interval before you're going to get your natural fire.
00:14:47.990 --> 00:15:06.288
So there's a real dissonance there and it's difficult for us to grasp it because we think, you know, we've got the postcard snapshot in our mind of this is what this place looks like, this forest, and not realizing like, oh no, this needs to burn every 15 years Like this really needs to burn to be healthy.
00:15:06.288 --> 00:15:09.293
And yet we're going to build our wooden structures right up next to it.
00:15:12.860 --> 00:15:23.807
So what you're saying, Michelle, is actually we have taken the dangers out that used to be in the middle of our residential areas, removed those, but now we've taken the residential areas and put them right in the middle of the problem, of the fire problem.
00:15:23.807 --> 00:15:25.799
Pretty much, Pretty much, Pretty much, yeah.
00:15:25.799 --> 00:15:27.446
So we turned it inside out.
00:15:27.446 --> 00:15:28.905
That's really interesting, isn't it?
00:15:28.905 --> 00:15:38.106
I actually never thought about it like that, Michelle, Taking the fire away from the center of communities and instead we've taken the communities and putting them into the center of the fire.
00:15:38.106 --> 00:15:47.101
So that is an interesting way of looking at it and considering this planning thought and the challenge of fire come from the outside.
00:15:47.121 --> 00:15:52.702
I always like to make the comparison of our suburban areas, our wild and urban interface areas.
00:15:52.743 --> 00:15:58.587
Anytime we build a lot of one and two family home, I like to compare it to what we do if we were building an apartment building.
00:15:59.090 --> 00:16:28.301
So if I was going to build 100 homes and I was going to stack them on top of each other and get a high-rise building, I would have all kinds of strict requirements to what materials these homes could be built of, how each one could exit their home and getting out safely from this high-rise building If I instead buy a big piece of land out in this beautiful natural area and I'd place these hundred houses all out here in this beautiful area.
00:16:28.662 --> 00:16:36.702
They are now seen as a one-family home, so the requirements to fire performance of each of the homes are fairly limited.
00:16:36.702 --> 00:16:42.682
Often it's only the roofing, if even, and there are no requirements to.
00:16:42.682 --> 00:16:55.830
Nor can we ensure that everyone can get out in case of a fire, because nobody has thought about the situation where a wildfire comes in and everybody in these hundred homes have to leave at the same time.
00:16:55.830 --> 00:17:03.028
So this beautiful little cul-de-sac with a hundred houses and one road in and out is going to turn out to be a disaster.
00:17:03.028 --> 00:17:17.653
So we have to start thinking of this as a scenario that has to be designed for not just in what we traditionally think of wild and urban interface, but in many places around the world.
00:17:17.980 --> 00:17:18.781
And I like the concept.
00:17:18.781 --> 00:17:34.145
But if you think about building regulations, okay, I see your point, that our paradigm, that we consider a single building because that's a legal responsibility of the single investor and that's where we can put laws and our requirements.
00:17:34.145 --> 00:17:41.809
For I think it comes more from the convenience and the way how a legal system is built rather from any technical reason why it's organized like that.
00:17:41.809 --> 00:17:50.112
But I mean, even if you build buildings inside of a city, you have those requirements the fire shall not spread to neighboring structures.
00:17:50.112 --> 00:18:01.147
So we already had some of those to some extent at least, the fire starting from the inside of the building shall not spread to the neighboring constructions.
00:18:01.147 --> 00:18:04.935
How is this threat different from that scenario?
00:18:05.497 --> 00:18:15.666
So if you have a fire that starts from within right and it goes to flash over, we will see the fire venting through the window and we can then have an exposure of the neighboring building.
00:18:16.059 --> 00:18:20.028
That is something we have designed for and regulated for.
00:18:20.028 --> 00:18:23.246
Here we're not talking about a flash over fire out of a window.
00:18:23.246 --> 00:18:25.055
We're talking about a flash or a fire out of a window.
00:18:25.055 --> 00:18:27.067
We're talking about a whole building on fire.
00:18:27.067 --> 00:18:28.384
That's the difference.
00:18:28.384 --> 00:18:36.852
So you now have not just one building, but several buildings, because it's not like all the embers decide to just land on one house and ignite that house and get that burning.
00:18:36.852 --> 00:18:43.748
We're talking about several houses that are potentially starting to burn and burn together, and then we start the configuration.
00:18:43.748 --> 00:18:49.388
Then the building starts burning, creates its new embers, it spreads to the next building, et cetera.
00:18:49.388 --> 00:18:51.767
It's not just fire from within.
00:18:51.767 --> 00:18:57.641
It's one room burning in one building, exposing the neighboring house here.
00:18:57.641 --> 00:19:01.571
It's many buildings burning at the same time, exposing many different houses.
00:19:01.960 --> 00:19:04.792
I did have Professor Simone in the podcast exposing many different help.
00:19:04.792 --> 00:19:24.007
I did have Professor Simone in the podcast and the one thing that he told me that really stayed with me is that once the fire coming from the wildfire, once this fire reaches the first house, it changes everything because suddenly the stuff produced in the fire of that house, plus the stuff from the wildfire itself, is a completely new hazard.
00:19:24.007 --> 00:19:28.428
How do you see that, how big issue is that and how much we should care about it?
00:19:29.028 --> 00:19:29.971
Huge, huge.
00:19:29.971 --> 00:19:33.911
Each of our homes are such a condensed fuel package.
00:19:33.911 --> 00:19:51.852
So you go from a natural fuel that's spread more evenly into extremely condensed fuel packages that start igniting and create a fire that is much more intense in that little local area compared to a wildfire in the same size area.
00:19:51.852 --> 00:20:01.832
So I did a bag of an envelope calculation saying I'm going to build a house that's approximately 200 square meters, 2000 square feet, and do it in the traditional American way.
00:20:01.832 --> 00:20:07.386
You would have more than 30 tons of combustible materials in that building.
00:20:07.386 --> 00:20:10.809
And that was even without whatever content people put in.
00:20:10.809 --> 00:20:12.487
This was just a construction material.
00:20:12.487 --> 00:20:14.586
It was unbelievable.
00:20:14.586 --> 00:20:21.292
So that is why, when each of these buildings starts burning, you go from a completely different fire.
00:20:21.292 --> 00:20:23.559
It's no longer a wildland fire.
00:20:23.559 --> 00:20:24.739
It becomes this wildland urban interface fire.
00:20:24.739 --> 00:20:24.885
It becomes an urban fire.
00:20:24.885 --> 00:20:25.384
It's no longer a wildland fire.
00:20:25.384 --> 00:20:26.590
It becomes this wildland urban interface fire.
00:20:26.590 --> 00:20:27.491
It becomes an urban fire.
00:20:27.491 --> 00:20:31.016
It becomes a conflagration if it's not stopped in its track.
00:20:31.839 --> 00:20:35.670
And you may want to also have Jack Cohen on this podcast at some point.
00:20:35.670 --> 00:20:37.441
Okay, noting, yeah.
00:20:37.441 --> 00:21:05.410
Dr Cohen is a retired Forest Service fire scientist who continues to preach his wisdom around his hometown of Missoula, montana, and other places, but his work and others, you know, is sort of the seminal work on home ignitions during these events and what he found, along with other scientists, in the International Crown Fire Experiments in 1998, they went up to the Northwest Territories of Canada, and they had these plots of, you know, these beautiful tall pine trees.
00:21:05.410 --> 00:21:08.890
They were able to light these plots on fire and watch these crown fires.
00:21:08.890 --> 00:21:22.095
Just go, you know, you've got 50 foot trees with 100 foot flame lengths, like very dramatic, but what he was testing was these make a wall out of wood, you know, make a roof line, put a person, a dummy, a mannequin out there.
00:21:22.095 --> 00:21:28.369
Just see what happens, see what happens to the gear, see what happens to things, and put the cameras out.
00:21:28.369 --> 00:21:30.457
This is low-tech in 1998.
00:21:30.457 --> 00:21:38.411
Put a camera protected by something, and then you'd see so many things where the fire would get close enough to shatter the glass on the lens in the camera.
00:21:38.652 --> 00:21:47.074
Very dramatic, and so what they were showing, though, was the fire moving through that fuel, those tall trees with the magnificent, crazy flames.
00:21:47.074 --> 00:21:50.289
You don't want to be anywhere near that because you will die right.
00:21:50.289 --> 00:21:55.330
A human being will instantly be killed by radiant heat from those flames.
00:21:55.330 --> 00:21:56.333
You don't have to have the flame touch.
00:21:56.420 --> 00:22:09.228
The radiant heat was what they're testing, but what they saw was if you had that piece of wood wall only 30 feet, 10 meters-ish, away from the flame, the edge of the fires, it didn't ignite.
00:22:09.789 --> 00:22:16.108
You might get a little scorched, but it didn't have enough sustained radiant heat to ignite and continue to burn that wood wall.
00:22:16.108 --> 00:22:18.741
So they said, okay, we've solved part of this problem.
00:22:18.741 --> 00:22:46.730
If you're worried about the fire impacting the home, radiant heat isn't that big of a deal, because if you can get that siding the sides of the house, the vulnerable parts of the exterior, to be away from that, so this idea of what they like to call defensible space another arguable term but this idea of space between the flaming front of the fire and the wall, okay, then you've eliminated the radiant heat problem from that source of fire, which is really great.
00:22:46.730 --> 00:22:48.013
So this was very exciting.
00:22:48.013 --> 00:22:57.063
What, of course, we're talking about, with a lot of the impacts to home, though, is not the fire coming and blowing up the home and all this mythology we have.
00:22:57.063 --> 00:22:58.463
It's not the radiant heat.
00:22:58.463 --> 00:23:06.991
In most cases it's the embers or it's the small flames that are running through uninterrupted vegetation to the house or to a fence or to a deck.
00:23:07.976 --> 00:23:12.463
You also mentioned those secondary items, trucks and everything that you can have outside of your homes, right?
00:23:12.763 --> 00:23:18.114
Mention those secondary items, trucks and everything that you can have outside of your homes right Fences, flat wooden decks.
00:23:18.114 --> 00:23:35.010
I mean we joke that you can design the perfect house and then the unlicensed contractors meaning everybody who wants to do it themselves don't get a permit and they go out to Home Depot or Lowe's or whatever and buy the stuff and tack a nice big flammable wooden deck to the house, big flammable wooden deck to the house.
00:23:35.010 --> 00:23:41.910
So it is that pathway of the fire spread are again things that now scientists are looking at much more carefully, because we've already solved for the radiant heat, we already get it.
00:23:41.910 --> 00:23:45.160
Okay, we don't want big flames near our house Cool, we can usually accommodate that.
00:23:45.160 --> 00:23:55.140
But we also can't have any flame touching the house and that's where you get fire creeping through the grass, fire igniting a wooden fence and carrying it like a wick or a fuse right up to the house.
00:23:55.140 --> 00:24:04.047
So it's these appurtenant structures, it's these things that don't even catch our attention when building and designing residential structures to think about.
00:24:04.047 --> 00:24:06.308
But it's the first thing and it's interesting.
00:24:06.409 --> 00:24:15.445
There have been now work on flammability of fence materials and arrangements and so forth, mobility of fence materials and arrangements and so forth, and you know the people who are experiencing it.
00:24:15.465 --> 00:24:16.691
We work with the communities, we work with the fire service.
00:24:16.711 --> 00:24:23.387
It was sort of our duh moment of yeah, we watch it all the time, we see it, but nobody's tested it in the lab.
00:24:23.494 --> 00:24:41.440
So we need to verify, which is really key, because otherwise the scientific community is not going to get the message, because the firefighters the first thing they did in one of the first things they did in the Waldo Canyon fire in 2012 in Colorado Springs community just into this fire siege was run in and start to knock down wooden fences.
00:24:42.021 --> 00:24:58.025
That's one of the first things they did to triage to try to save homes was they knew if the fire reaches this fence, these homes are gone because it was connecting them all like a, like a fuse, and we see that anecdotally over and over again in fires where firefighters have enough time to get in.
00:24:58.025 --> 00:25:02.963
That's one of the first things they're going to do is get rid of that link from the fire to the house.
00:25:02.963 --> 00:25:09.267
And if we put that in our planning, maybe we think about hey, why not use a different material?
00:25:09.267 --> 00:25:11.018
Maybe we don't need a fence here.
00:25:11.018 --> 00:25:21.601
Let's not create ways for the fire to get to our house so the firefighters aren't running around having to do that while they could be doing other things and while they could be fighting more effectively and more safely.
00:25:22.375 --> 00:25:25.281
I wonder where, at what scale, the solutions are there.
00:25:25.281 --> 00:25:28.364
Are the solutions at the single house level?
00:25:28.364 --> 00:25:32.358
Are they at neighborhood, community level, district level planning?
00:25:32.419 --> 00:25:37.723
I don't know federal level yes, I mean, I have a feeling they're on every.
00:25:37.723 --> 00:25:38.329
That's the immediate answer.
00:25:38.329 --> 00:25:38.734
Right, all of them.
00:25:38.734 --> 00:25:40.480
But look at all of them.
00:25:40.480 --> 00:25:42.705
You have different stakeholders involved.
00:25:42.705 --> 00:25:54.288
You have basically different people who would have to pay money for the solution, and if one of those fail to pay money for the solution, the others will not work in an optimal way.
00:25:54.288 --> 00:25:54.808
Right?
00:25:54.808 --> 00:25:56.398
For me, that's a hell of a problem.
00:25:56.779 --> 00:26:01.037
Right, and this goes for other fire problems and other life safety problems.
00:26:01.037 --> 00:26:13.667
But I think we're running up against it's very true in the wildfire space the idea that the strong notion that everything has to be free, cheap, affordable, I think is going against fire safety.
00:26:13.667 --> 00:26:17.741
But to me you're not in a sustainable or safe environment.
00:26:17.741 --> 00:26:22.039
How can you say to people you've got to choose between safety and affordability.
00:26:22.039 --> 00:26:23.202
I mean, how can you do that?
00:26:23.202 --> 00:26:25.627
That's to me very criminal.
00:26:25.627 --> 00:26:33.340
In other words, we want to house people but let's put them in high rises in an inner city that we're not going to do any kind of fire safety.
00:26:33.340 --> 00:26:35.906
You know we're going to let people just take their chances.
00:26:35.906 --> 00:26:47.105
To me it's the same in the wild and urban interface where arguably many, many communities that are built there are more affluent and people think they're buying, they assume they have safety when they buy a home.
00:26:47.105 --> 00:26:54.058
You know, in these areas, especially if it's an expensive, nice area, and they aren't getting safety and they have no idea that they're not getting safety.
00:26:54.460 --> 00:27:00.565
I think that, michelle, you're talking really upon the 2% or 98% problem, as you call it right.
00:27:00.565 --> 00:27:18.921
Our new build rate is very small, so 98% of the buildings that are standing today will be standing for a long time and therefore we need to figure out how to make them perform better in those situations.