March 5, 2025

191 - Committee participation with Birgitte Messerschmidt and Kees Both

The player is loading ...

This episode explores the invaluable contributions of community participation in fire safety technical committees. Joining committees is not just about sharing expertise; it’s a journey that transforms careers and fosters growth. Our guests, Birgitte Messerschmidt and Kees Both, reveal how their experiences in various committees, including the NFPA, ISO, ASTM and CEN, have shaped their professional paths.

As we dive deeper into the intricacies of committee politics, our guests candidly share the challenges and rewards of engaging in this important work. They emphasize how participating in committees enhances one's career and contributes to the greater good by improving fire safety standards. This is an essential discussion for any engineer, especially those starting their careers, as they navigate the complexities of working with diverse stakeholders.

If you just felt inspired to join a committee, please look here:

https://www.sfpe.org/membership-communities/standingcommittees
https://www.nfpa.org/for-professionals/codes-and-standards/standards-development/technical-committees/committees-seeking-members
https://www.cencenelec.eu/get-involved/small-and-medium-enterprises-smes/tools-for-smes/getting-involved/

Or just shoot us an email, or reach out at LinkedIn. We will help you out!

Fire Science Show has been named the top podcast in Fire Protection and Safety by Feedspot. Check the list below, and you will also discover a lot more podcasts in our space!

https://podcast.feedspot.com/fire_protection_and_safety_podcasts/

Thank you for your continuous support, and to the OFR for making it possible to create this content!

----
The Fire Science Show is produced by the Fire Science Media in collaboration with OFR Consultants. Thank you to the podcast sponsor for their continuous support towards our mission.

01:22 - Introduction

03:09 - Importance of Giving Back to the Community

41:06 - Personal Stories of Committee Participation

01:03:02 - The Journey Begins: Joining Committees

01:40:56 - Welcome Birgit Messerschmidt and Keith Spoth

04:03:08 - Overview of Committee Experiences

06:36:36 - Final Thoughts and Encouraging Participation

10:01:22 - The Value of Networking in Committees

15:12:58 - Learning from Committee Discussions

WEBVTT

00:00:00.281 --> 00:00:02.145
Hello everybody, welcome to the Fire Science Show.

00:00:02.145 --> 00:00:06.841
Giving back to community is something most of us would like to do.

00:00:06.841 --> 00:00:08.926
I think even all of us would like to do.

00:00:08.926 --> 00:00:40.122
My way of giving back is through the podcast, papers and other activities, but for many people, the way they would prefer to give back to the community is through participation within different bodies that create the body of knowledge that we all use and benefit from later, be it standardization committees, technical committees, advisory boards and so forth, and actually I've been asked multiple times to cover the subject of participating in those committees.

00:00:40.122 --> 00:00:59.359
For example, I've received a very nice letter from a listener, kevin Feek, who described his participation in NFPA committees and how he changed his life, and I must say stories like this that someone has just joined the committee without any expectations and then it became a significant part of their lives is very common.

00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:01.063
I would say it's also my story.

00:01:01.683 --> 00:01:14.412
In 2012, I believe, I've joined the CEN, tc191, sc1, workgroup 5 and 9 committees, and that was something that really changed my life, my professional career.

00:01:14.412 --> 00:01:17.447
I was exposed to new knowledge, new people.

00:01:17.447 --> 00:01:21.022
I've met fantastic people, good friends and still in touch with them.

00:01:21.022 --> 00:01:40.022
So definitely it was something I've benefited from largely and I think it's worth talking about this and to talk about this subject, I've invited the person that I think is in every single committee that exists in this universe not just kidding, but he's definitely involved in in so many and in such a variety.

00:01:40.022 --> 00:01:41.525
It's really impressive.

00:01:41.525 --> 00:02:17.832
My good friend, keys both he's been a guest on this podcast before and alongside a colleague who I know that has been a part of many uh committees in europe, and now, behind the ocean, she's one of the directors at nfpa a good friend, bergitte messerschmidt, and together we'll try to tell you what were our journeys to different standardization and technical committees, what a researcher or an engineer can gain from participating in those and, in general, the goods and a bit of the bad sides of participating.

00:02:17.832 --> 00:02:19.604
And I'll spoil it a bit for you.

00:02:19.604 --> 00:02:20.588
It's definitely worth it.

00:02:20.588 --> 00:02:23.370
So let's spin the intro and jump into the episode.

00:02:28.020 --> 00:02:29.640
Welcome to the Firesize Show.

00:02:29.640 --> 00:02:33.103
My name is Wojciech Wigrzyński and I will be your host.

00:02:33.103 --> 00:02:56.177
This podcast is brought to you in collaboration with Ofar Consultants, a multi-award winning independent consultancy dedicated to addressing fire safety challenges.

00:02:56.177 --> 00:03:07.854
Established in the UK in 2016 as a startup business of two highly experienced fire engineering consultants, the business has grown phenomenally to eight offices across the country, from Edinburgh to Bath.

00:03:07.854 --> 00:03:17.430
Colleagues are on a mission to continually explore the challenges that fire creates for clients and society, applying the best research experience and diligence for effective, tailored solution.

00:03:17.430 --> 00:03:21.604
In 2025, there will be new opportunities to work with OFR.

00:03:21.604 --> 00:03:29.247
Ofr will grow its team once more and is keen to hear from industry professionals who would like to collaborate on fire safety features this year.

00:03:29.247 --> 00:03:31.953
Get in touch at OFRConsultantscom.

00:03:31.953 --> 00:03:37.510
Hello everybody, I am joined here today by Birgit Messerschmidt, director at NFPA.

00:03:37.510 --> 00:03:38.052
Hey, birgit.

00:03:38.661 --> 00:03:39.926
Hey Wojciech, Nice to be back.

00:03:40.520 --> 00:03:42.705
Welcome back and another comeback to the show.

00:03:42.705 --> 00:03:48.288
Unsuccessful bridge salesman who entered the fire laboratory and never left it, Keith Spoth.

00:03:48.288 --> 00:03:50.435
Hey Keith, Hello Jack, Can I have a good day?

00:03:50.435 --> 00:03:51.626
Nice to be back as well.

00:03:51.819 --> 00:04:02.139
Thank you guys for joining me on this podcast episode and this was requested by audience multiple times since I started my podcast journey and we will be talking about community participation.

00:04:02.139 --> 00:04:07.361
A lot of people are asking to cover this part of our community.

00:04:07.361 --> 00:04:23.807
There are a lot of ways for our engineers can give back to the community and I believe participating in various technical committees that exist in our space is one way of giving back and I would love to give it a thorough discussion about pros and cons of participating and how to do it.

00:04:23.807 --> 00:04:33.269
But to settle the playing field, what committees you are or were a part of, let's try to list them and please make it like less than five minutes.

00:04:33.269 --> 00:04:38.872
Birgit, maybe we'll start with you and he makes his mind off the endless list of committees.

00:04:39.240 --> 00:04:43.139
Okay, well, I'm no longer active in standardization committees.

00:04:43.139 --> 00:04:50.548
The interesting thing is, as one of the people working at NFPA, I cannot be active in the NFPA standardization committees.

00:04:50.548 --> 00:04:53.226
We support them with the work that we do in research.

00:04:53.226 --> 00:05:02.550
When the technical committees have things they want us to look at, then we look at it and provide the answer back, but I cannot vote on NFPA standards as an NFPA employee.

00:05:02.569 --> 00:05:03.291
That's interesting yeah.

00:05:03.940 --> 00:05:05.985
So that's some of the interesting parts of that.

00:05:05.985 --> 00:05:13.988
So I actually haven't been active in committees for more than eight years, but before that I was very active in committees.

00:05:13.988 --> 00:05:15.812
I started out early in my career.

00:05:15.812 --> 00:05:21.310
So I started out in Danish standards in the mirror committee to SENT-TC-127.

00:05:21.310 --> 00:05:46.675
And from there I became a member of SENT-TC-127, particularly the working group on reaction to fire I think it's working group four I don't know if they've changed names since and also into ISO-TC-92, subcommittee one, also on reaction to fire, was active there, later also in subcommittee three on smoke toxicity, and then I've been active in a notified bodies group etc.

00:05:47.560 --> 00:06:01.091
That's what I can think of right now that I've been active in so long story short CN committees and ISO committees for fire safety engineering and now, even though you're not a member, a lot of knowledge on NFPA committees.

00:06:01.821 --> 00:06:03.708
Definitely some knowledge on that.

00:06:03.788 --> 00:06:06.728
yes, and a kiss for you, thank you.

00:06:06.728 --> 00:06:10.466
And Birgitta was just a bit ahead of me, although she's a bit younger than I am.

00:06:10.466 --> 00:06:15.185
She paved the path and I've always sort of admired what she had been doing.

00:06:15.185 --> 00:06:22.504
So at a certain point there was when I switched jobs from the flyer laboratory and went to the dark side of industry, so to speak.

00:06:22.504 --> 00:06:43.869
One of my, say, mentors there was a guy, stefan van Houten, and I think Birgitte knows him well, and I was about to step into his footsteps and he was also in CEN not necessarily in ISO or in US standards and I had a bit of a free roll when I came, managed the laboratory and so forth and gradually I rolled into CEN standards.

00:06:43.869 --> 00:06:45.004
It was not unknown to me.

00:06:45.004 --> 00:06:49.951
I did partake in some other Dutch standards committees in SEND, but not so much.

00:06:50.399 --> 00:06:57.127
So when I started this adventure I call it an adventure I was like okay, there's a new world sort of opening for me.

00:06:57.127 --> 00:07:04.201
A lot of people from the network were already there, but I also came to know a lot of other people with very different opinions.

00:07:04.201 --> 00:07:15.269
And if I can say one thing to make people enthusiastic about this, it's certainly a stepping stone to build your network or to meet people basically, and that's if standardization is anything.

00:07:15.269 --> 00:07:26.478
It's about meeting people from different cultures with different opinions, different views on, say, a definition of what, for example, a rate of heat release actually is, and then we should measure it.

00:07:26.478 --> 00:07:30.149
So that's a whole new world that sort of opened to me.

00:07:30.149 --> 00:07:46.262
And one thing that I learned was that, okay, we are far advanced, we think, in Europe, but a small step that would be to ISO standards, and from there it was not too difficult to explain to my superiors that it would also be of interest to watch what the Americans are doing.

00:07:46.583 --> 00:07:51.274
And I had already one say nice experience in NFPA.

00:07:51.274 --> 00:07:59.122
I must say 502, and Brigetti, you know it well, it's tunnels and as you know, I have one specific hobby, or a tunnel vision, if you like.

00:07:59.122 --> 00:08:14.220
So it was NFPA 502 that really inspired me also to say, well, guys, what NFPA is doing, what ASTM are doing and what UL are doing, that's of interest also to what we're doing here in Europe, if not the global community.

00:08:14.220 --> 00:08:23.939
And then one thing sort of escalated I started to become an active member in ASTM, expanded the NFPA to 550 and 1700.

00:08:23.939 --> 00:08:29.552
Actually, as we speak, 1700 is meeting this week but unfortunately it can come to the US.

00:08:29.552 --> 00:08:45.245
So I'm in a number of ASTM committees as well and because of my, say, love and appetite for this and FIRE soon, I was asked also to do something on, say, fiber cement and gypsum, and then it sort of exploded.

00:08:45.365 --> 00:08:48.620
So okay, a good overview of the committees.

00:08:48.620 --> 00:08:52.870
Uh, especially that you have this astm nfp experience firsthand.

00:08:52.870 --> 00:08:54.192
I I appreciate that.

00:08:54.192 --> 00:09:11.952
I knew that you and cn are very close together and I personally been part of cn but I was a part of groups for smoke control and that was was a big part of my life Still is important to me, but not active that much for the recent years.

00:09:11.952 --> 00:09:22.028
And outside of technical committees standardization committees I also participate in adventures like SFP technical committees, for example, rewriting the risk guidebook.

00:09:22.028 --> 00:09:23.365
That's very important.

00:09:23.365 --> 00:09:25.648
That's going to be a standard actually soon.

00:09:25.648 --> 00:09:35.149
And I also participated in networks like COST, which is some sort of committees for scientists perhaps different way of collaborating, but the same concept.

00:09:35.149 --> 00:09:39.392
You put punch people in a room to convene on important stuff.

00:09:39.392 --> 00:09:48.740
So, having this in mind, this decades of experience we shared together in those standardization committees Kis, you said it's networking.

00:09:48.740 --> 00:09:57.490
So for a young person that just enters the room, how does participating in committee provide you a networking opportunity?

00:09:57.490 --> 00:09:59.707
How does it translate to your network really?

00:10:00.279 --> 00:10:03.148
So I would think that well, for example, you mentioned SFPE right.

00:10:03.148 --> 00:10:07.899
So that would be predominantly a network of peers.

00:10:07.899 --> 00:10:15.788
So you would meet other professional engineers or consultants In CEN or in ISO or NFPA, for example.

00:10:15.788 --> 00:10:17.251
It would be a bit broader.

00:10:17.251 --> 00:10:29.288
So you would be more exposed to other stakeholders, whether it's producers, like I am, or a fire laboratory or a certification body or the standards bodies themselves.

00:10:29.288 --> 00:10:38.326
So you might meet Brigitte, although she might be a guest and not partaking actually in the meetings, so you would meet people from the fire brigade.

00:10:38.366 --> 00:10:45.572
You would meet all kinds of people who would not necessarily be sitting as a VE-member or another, say, say, association.

00:10:45.572 --> 00:11:04.072
You would also be well exposed to other narratives and things that people say, because they have different agendas, obviously, when they speak as peers and direct colleagues amongst each other, or when they have to, say, make make clear what the position of a certain stakeholder group actually actually is.

00:11:04.072 --> 00:11:09.472
So it's it's about meeting different people, not necessarily also from different countries.

00:11:09.472 --> 00:11:16.028
So when you are an SFP member, you also meet people from different countries, but you really see people coming from a different approaching.

00:11:16.028 --> 00:11:22.331
I would say the diamond from a different angle and then see the slinkering and slunkering from a different angle.

00:11:22.331 --> 00:11:31.549
So that's how I would like to say standardization work is actually part of looking at a problem from different perspectives and trying to solve it from different stakeholder perspective.

00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:33.847
But how would that be different from a conference?

00:11:33.847 --> 00:11:36.666
Let's say you also meet different people with different viewpoints on conference.

00:11:36.666 --> 00:11:39.048
Would this setting be different to a conference?

00:11:39.461 --> 00:11:41.128
You wouldn't necessarily have a goal right.

00:11:41.128 --> 00:12:01.687
So a conference is about meeting people and more or less a one-way direction of what, exposing the audience to new findings, and you can have some critique on it, obviously, but it doesn't necessarily come to, it's not necessarily with an aim to come at a, a standard, so a common agreement on how to move things forward.

00:12:01.687 --> 00:12:06.549
So conferences have their their part, obviously, but it's it's a different aim that you have.

00:12:07.942 --> 00:12:10.529
It's a very different aim just to jump in there.

00:12:10.529 --> 00:12:15.804
Also, a standardization committee group is smaller than a conference.

00:12:15.804 --> 00:12:18.830
There's a lot of people and who am I going to connect with?

00:12:18.830 --> 00:12:20.447
From my own experience?

00:12:20.607 --> 00:12:41.235
I mean, I came into standardization very early in my career and one of the things is you walk into the room as a very young one with people who are very, very experienced, and that is a great opportunity to learn from people that have that experience that yourself you're not there yet.

00:12:41.821 --> 00:12:48.205
So it's a great opportunity to connect with people that have that kind of experience that you're looking to gain.

00:12:48.205 --> 00:13:03.341
It's also, as Kees was saying, the fact that you're working on something together and often when you come in as one of the young ones in the technical committees, it's often because you have worked on some research that is needed by the technical committee.

00:13:03.341 --> 00:13:25.113
This is actually your opportunity to show your work to some of the people in power within FIRE and connect with them and show them what it is you've been working on and then enjoy seeing that what you have worked on now makes it into the process of where it becomes usable to people out in the field.

00:13:25.113 --> 00:13:35.083
That is really what I see as some of the extremely fascinating points as being some of the young ones stepping in to the standards committees.

00:13:36.886 --> 00:13:42.658
I think you both nailed it and I can relate this from my experience.

00:13:42.658 --> 00:13:46.269
It was exactly what Keith said meeting people with a common goal.

00:13:46.269 --> 00:13:54.981
So it's not like, while I enjoy conference settings, for sure, everyone there comes with their own ideas, problems, their own focus.

00:13:54.981 --> 00:13:59.541
In the committee group, you are sorted by focus, like everyone shares the same focus.

00:13:59.541 --> 00:14:01.904
Everyone is interested in this one particular problem for which the committee is, and if you're not, you are sorted by focus.

00:14:01.904 --> 00:14:02.264
Like everyone shares the same focus.

00:14:02.264 --> 00:14:05.484
Everyone is interested in this one particular problem for which the committee is, and if you're not, you probably should not be on the committee.

00:14:05.484 --> 00:14:08.754
So everyone has this common denominator for everything you say.

00:14:09.065 --> 00:14:24.610
And like you said I resonate with that very strongly that as a young researcher, you start to feel relevancy of your own work and also you know you can prove yourself and present some really valuable insight into the committee.

00:14:24.610 --> 00:14:27.231
But you're also pre-validated.

00:14:27.231 --> 00:14:30.573
If you're in the committee, you've already been vetted.

00:14:30.573 --> 00:14:37.633
You know that you will be an important member of that committee, like my experience is whenever a new person came into the group.

00:14:37.633 --> 00:14:45.315
It's not that the person sits on the edge of the table and then listens to the conversations for the next five meetings until they become relevant.

00:14:45.315 --> 00:14:46.812
They are relevant from day one.

00:14:46.812 --> 00:14:49.552
Was this your experience also, Kies, when you were joining new committees?

00:14:49.953 --> 00:14:52.469
Yes, absolutely, and I would well.

00:14:52.469 --> 00:15:11.635
Perhaps it's a bit, I don't know, pushy to say it, but you perhaps even have an obligation to share your knowledge, not only on the conference, because there people will be eagerly absorbing the knowledge that you bring to the table, but then to take it to the next level and make sure that it's somewhere embedded in regulations or standards.

00:15:11.635 --> 00:15:14.153
And whatever a standard actually is.

00:15:14.153 --> 00:15:17.511
It can be a fire engineering standard, it can be a testing standard, it can be both.

00:15:17.965 --> 00:15:31.854
You could argue and make a case that whatever you bring to the table, as a young researcher you have some obligation to see it true to the actual embedding in everyday use of engineers or who else is using it in the field.

00:15:31.854 --> 00:15:34.192
So that's something to bear in mind.

00:15:34.192 --> 00:15:38.437
And for that to happen you can't just only present at a conference.

00:15:38.437 --> 00:15:47.500
You also make sure that it's well heard of, at least make it aware to people in SAN and ISO and NFPA and whatnot.

00:15:47.500 --> 00:15:57.917
And you'll be surprised and Birgitte, you can vouch for this because I entered a bit later You'd be surprised as to how much you will be welcomed as a young engineer.

00:15:57.917 --> 00:16:04.950
But all of the old people like us, us now we can say that you made the joke before we start the recording.

00:16:04.950 --> 00:16:09.571
Right, all of us fall in love with the youngsters who come with with their research to the table.

00:16:09.630 --> 00:16:23.990
We've all been there so we know what it's like basically a part of the reason is also that there's it's a lot of work to do in the committee, especially when you have to supply this technical supplementary material to guide the decisions.

00:16:23.990 --> 00:16:31.054
So while the meeting can take you one, two, three days, it sometimes takes weeks or months preparing for the meeting with the material.

00:16:31.054 --> 00:16:36.414
And if you can drop this on a youngster, all of us have a lot on our tables.

00:16:36.414 --> 00:16:40.780
If there's someone willing to do the job, I'm not going to stop them.

00:16:40.780 --> 00:16:50.692
I will look into that job, but I will allow them, I will give them this ability to showcase their abilities while creating good technical feedback to guide the decisions.

00:16:50.753 --> 00:16:57.174
And I think this presenting and discussing this during a committee meeting is very different than the conference.

00:16:57.174 --> 00:17:00.788
In conference, you know you present, you have five questions in the end.

00:17:00.788 --> 00:17:03.953
They can be nice questions, they can be bad questions, it doesn't matter.

00:17:03.953 --> 00:17:05.316
It takes you five minutes to answer.

00:17:05.316 --> 00:17:08.460
You go eat your dinner and move on to something else.

00:17:08.460 --> 00:17:18.488
On the committee, you can spend three hours talking about the simulation In the absolute deepest details and you really learn a lot from those conversations.

00:17:18.528 --> 00:17:38.194
If I could tell you the anecdote, maybe not now, but we've had like two or three years of meetings well, not obviously a thousand days, but three years of meetings on two words and an or relating to deflection and deflection rate as to load-bearing capacity criteria.

00:17:38.194 --> 00:17:40.031
Can you imagine three years on this?

00:17:40.031 --> 00:17:47.071
And when I say it like this, you're like okay, I hope people are not switching off from the broadcast now Because there's a story to tell.

00:17:47.071 --> 00:18:08.796
One other thing to add to this what people learn and hand it over then to Brigitte you learn additional skills as a youngster, because to convince your peers of your scientific work, that's one thing, but to convince people who are not so scientific or have a completely different viewpoint, you need argumentation skills, you need to listen and you need to argue and to repeat that with different words.

00:18:09.045 --> 00:18:12.316
It's a really good point there that you're making.

00:18:12.316 --> 00:18:21.994
You have to really learn how to present to all kinds of different people in the technical committee and you can spend so much time on one word.

00:18:21.994 --> 00:18:28.513
And when you come in as a young researcher it's like well, I've done all this research and I know this is right from what I've worked on.

00:18:28.513 --> 00:18:39.857
It can be tough suddenly to get that kind of feedback and discussion that suddenly drills down into a nitty gritty little thing where you go like why is this important?

00:18:39.857 --> 00:18:43.729
A nitty gritty little thing where you go like why is this important?

00:18:43.749 --> 00:18:52.016
And this is where your patience has to come in play and understand the role that the standards are playing and the importance of the standard Because it's.

00:18:52.016 --> 00:19:08.535
One thing is that you come in with the technical and the technical research and all that is correct and so on, but the role that the standards play in the world is so much bigger and therefore suddenly, is it an and or an or?

00:19:08.535 --> 00:19:43.492
It can be market share, and for a young researcher to accept that and understand that is a learning process that is extremely important and that is where try not to lose your patience with the standard process but actually start enjoying seeing that well, when I take my work from here, from the pure technical, bring it into a group of very different people that are going to try and make this into a standard, it suddenly becomes psychological as well.

00:19:45.009 --> 00:19:50.684
Yeah, I have also this experience joining the technical committee as a very young engineer.

00:19:51.145 --> 00:20:06.886
At that point I was not a scientist yet and I was very let's say, I was actually quite experienced in designing systems, but in my own country, you know, following a very specific set of rules and ways of how to design that were very specific for my country.

00:20:07.529 --> 00:20:18.891
And then I am dropped into a group of various people coming from different backgrounds, coming from different countries, with their own ideas how to design systems, and apparently their systems are very different than mine.

00:20:18.891 --> 00:20:36.464
You know, things that I take for granted in my systems may not necessarily be relevant to theirs, you know so I have to now look at everything I do from a different lens that actually there are other ways to do it, there are other ways to understand that there are things that I consider most important.

00:20:36.464 --> 00:20:44.724
For someone other it's not, and we're writing a common standard that's like European standard, that it should share all those perspectives.

00:20:44.724 --> 00:20:52.151
It was very interesting because that was the first real environment in which I was really exposed to those differences.

00:20:52.151 --> 00:21:00.751
Perhaps, if you're like I am a FSE student and you have this multicultural you know experience of traveling across Europe, studying with other people.

00:21:00.751 --> 00:21:04.358
Perhaps that's the group of people that already immediately has this.

00:21:09.384 --> 00:21:11.009
But for me, an engineer coming from Poland, that was very interesting to discover.

00:21:11.029 --> 00:21:30.519
If anyone can tell, it's you on the call now because you have the experience coming from Denmark and moving to the US where you think, ah, it's also a Western civilized country, but the modus operandi is quite different, even to become a member, say, of NFPA, or ASTN for that matter.

00:21:30.519 --> 00:21:32.653
But that's a nuance perhaps.

00:21:32.653 --> 00:21:34.525
But the building codes are different.

00:21:34.525 --> 00:21:39.758
The way people's stakeholders are addressed and how they communicate is different.

00:21:39.758 --> 00:21:43.248
So maybe you can shed some light on that, because it might be of interest.

00:21:43.849 --> 00:22:13.118
Well again, as not being an active member of NFPA committees because I don't have that practical experience from it, but from seeing it in functions from the other side, I do see the significant difference to the work that we are doing in Europe and in CEN and where in CEN you come in through your national standards committees and therefore whoever participates is designed by your national standards committee.

00:22:13.785 --> 00:22:31.921
They can agree on a balance or not, and then when it gets into the CEN committee, suddenly you can have a committee that might be very heavy on one side and not other opinions as much, because there's not an overarching look at how this committee combined.

00:22:31.921 --> 00:22:47.336
At NFPA we are very much about a balanced committee, so there's not more than one third of a committee can come from one specific group and we do look into that, we are very clear about that and I think that makes a huge difference in the work.

00:22:47.336 --> 00:22:48.730
What do we mean by one group?

00:22:48.730 --> 00:22:58.394
That can be manufacturers, it can be authorities having jurisdiction, it can be consumers, it can be test laboratories etc.

00:22:58.394 --> 00:23:03.781
So we have nine different categories and none of those can have more than one third.

00:23:04.182 --> 00:23:04.845
That's very interesting.

00:23:05.586 --> 00:23:18.250
And I think that is extremely interesting and an important difference because I must admit, like KS now is representing, as you said, the dark side, industry I did for many years as well.

00:23:18.250 --> 00:23:28.233
I did standardization, first from DBI, so the neutral side, and then for Rockwall for many years dark side of industry.

00:23:28.233 --> 00:23:35.855
So I know both sides of this and I know why industry has a significant interest in the standardization work.

00:23:35.855 --> 00:23:46.816
But it also, through experience, have been sitting in committees where we've been too many industry people and not enough people from, for instance, the laboratories or from research organizations.

00:23:46.816 --> 00:23:52.602
You know where we could have these young researchers coming in with the information that we needed.

00:23:52.602 --> 00:24:07.914
Between the process that we're running here compared to the process that we're running in Europe, and then, just generally, as I've said before, right in the US, I always thought that coming over here must be easier.

00:24:07.914 --> 00:24:12.017
One country, we would have just one regulation, et cetera.

00:24:12.184 --> 00:24:16.452
It's like no, no no it's more complicated because each state does their own thing.

00:24:16.724 --> 00:24:25.373
Brigitte took me into, like she twisted the question, but she brought me into a very important subject of matter, which is how you become a part of a committee.

00:24:25.373 --> 00:24:31.009
So you said, cn, you get nominated by your national committee and you're kind of a representative of your country.

00:24:31.009 --> 00:24:34.583
You could consider yourself like that In NFPA.

00:24:34.583 --> 00:24:36.351
How do you become a member of a committee?

00:24:37.152 --> 00:24:44.993
You go on our website and go in and see what you know apply to become a member and then you're appointed by our standards council.

00:24:44.993 --> 00:24:50.414
So it goes to them and they appoint, and that's where they then can see well, actually in this committee.

00:24:50.414 --> 00:24:58.294
Now, if KS wanted to go into a committee and this committee is already has a heavy load of manufacturers it would be able.

00:24:58.294 --> 00:25:01.513
At the moment, there is not a seat available in this group.

00:25:03.385 --> 00:25:09.138
So it would be like pushing yourself forward and then you're assessed whether you're a good match for the committee.

00:25:09.138 --> 00:25:12.454
So I would say SFP committees are very similar.

00:25:12.454 --> 00:25:18.337
If you're a member of SFP, there are multiple technical committees that you can apply for.

00:25:18.337 --> 00:25:23.334
You send an email to the admin of that group, you get evaluated and eventually you get in.

00:25:23.334 --> 00:25:27.876
If a completely new committee forms, they often would scout for members.

00:25:28.105 --> 00:25:31.770
That's how I remember this risk what NFPA also does.

00:25:31.770 --> 00:25:36.892
So the committee actively searching new yeah, but especially when the new forms.

00:25:37.746 --> 00:25:40.134
So you need a first group of people to form a committee.

00:25:40.134 --> 00:25:46.055
So then it's probably the easiest to join, and for ISO, I believe it's also a national nomination.

00:25:47.411 --> 00:25:48.679
Yes, same as POSEN.

00:25:48.679 --> 00:26:02.871
Well, maybe it's nice if I may get to advertise a bit for ASTM, because they also have this balance of, I think, nine stakeholder groups and they carefully monitor that there's not an unbalance in this.

00:26:02.871 --> 00:26:10.515
But you can always become a member, but you are not granted voting rights, so you're the backbencher, so to speak.

00:26:10.515 --> 00:26:14.747
But that gives you access to all the meetings and to everything At NFPA.

00:26:14.747 --> 00:26:18.070
You can always be invited as a guest, so that will be my first step.

00:26:18.070 --> 00:26:21.215
That's actually how I entered NFPA 502.

00:26:21.215 --> 00:26:22.405
As a guest.

00:26:22.405 --> 00:26:23.087
So that would be my first step.

00:26:23.087 --> 00:26:24.491
That's actually how I entered NFPA 502.

00:26:24.511 --> 00:26:27.179
So I was asked by the then chair of the NFPA 502 committee to appear as a guest, so I was.

00:26:27.179 --> 00:26:38.432
Then the meeting room was too small, I was literally a backbencher, but soon I was promoted to the table when someone had to leave early, so I was allowed to literally sit at the table.

00:26:38.432 --> 00:26:40.438
But it starts there.

00:26:40.438 --> 00:26:52.286
You have to be a bit bold and brave and and just to come to mention it, perhaps forget that may be a role that that you and I and maybe some others can play as well, like mentors or younger people that are entering for the first time.

00:26:52.286 --> 00:26:53.007
In a comedy.

00:26:53.007 --> 00:27:05.333
It would be good that comedies have like a mentor that that would allow people, freshmen or fresh ladies, to enter a a committee and to give them a bit of guidance how to behave, where to sit, what not to do.

00:27:05.834 --> 00:27:08.146
I think that's a really, really good point, kees.

00:27:08.146 --> 00:27:10.073
I think that is truly needed.

00:27:10.073 --> 00:27:19.518
I've been lucky through my career to have some mentors when I was younger in my colleagues and that truly helped me in the standardization work.

00:27:19.518 --> 00:27:28.395
But I think some of the points you point out, casey, about the openness of the way that US do standardization is very different from Europe.

00:27:28.395 --> 00:27:29.770
Also, anyone can comment.

00:27:29.770 --> 00:27:32.534
Anyone can send comments to an NFPA standard.

00:27:32.534 --> 00:27:34.592
It's a totally open process.

00:27:34.592 --> 00:27:37.875
Just go on the website, see where the standards are.

00:27:37.875 --> 00:27:41.255
Every standard is being revised every three to five years.

00:27:41.255 --> 00:27:47.690
You can go in and see where it is in the cycle and if there's open for comments, everybody can send in comments.

00:27:48.291 --> 00:27:50.057
We have the same in SFP.

00:27:50.057 --> 00:28:02.227
All the outcomes of those committees would go through public questions period where anyone can read the standard, Even though if the standard will cost or the book will cost $200 after it's being published.

00:28:02.227 --> 00:28:06.729
They just give the draft version for free for everyone to comment, to gather feedback.

00:28:06.729 --> 00:28:17.856
You know it's also a good way to familiarize yourself with documents and understand where the world is moving towards, and also a stepping foot, you know, for future engagements.

00:28:17.856 --> 00:28:25.731
So if you're commenting really well, I would assume you would eventually be invited to the committee because you have smart things to say, right?

00:28:26.173 --> 00:28:28.993
Exactly, or you can just participate as a guest.

00:28:28.993 --> 00:28:34.946
If you've commented and you can come in as an observer, connect with.

00:28:34.946 --> 00:28:37.192
It's open on our website.

00:28:37.192 --> 00:28:41.070
Who is the chair, who is the staff liaison from NFPA and who's the member of the?

00:28:41.070 --> 00:28:46.777
Is the staff liaison from NFPA and who is the member of the committee and you can contact them, say I have some things I would like to present to the committee, et cetera.

00:28:46.777 --> 00:28:53.750
So it has fascinated me to see how open the process is compared to the experience that I've had in Sandvik.

00:28:53.924 --> 00:28:55.151
And nevertheless manageable.

00:28:55.151 --> 00:29:00.176
So it's very open indeed, but nevertheless it seems manageable.

00:29:00.176 --> 00:29:08.891
So it's not like you open it up and then you've opened up the can of worms and you can't handle it.

00:29:08.891 --> 00:29:13.097
Apparently, you found a modus operandi that actually works, so I'm fond of the US way of doing things.

00:29:13.097 --> 00:29:24.736
That said, it's not so easy and there are a lot of people perhaps not unwilling to change this also in in europe.

00:29:24.736 --> 00:29:26.502
But this, this will take perhaps another generation before this, this happens.

00:29:26.522 --> 00:29:37.652
So this, this procedure, like you, apply to a national committee where there is perhaps a bit more, say, emphasis on safeguarding the, the balance in in the national merit committees.

00:29:37.652 --> 00:29:38.593
But then it comes.

00:29:38.593 --> 00:29:41.920
So the people who can then go to send an ISO.

00:29:41.920 --> 00:29:51.113
Well, you can imagine that ISO the abbreviation sometimes is nicknamed as International Sightseeing Organization you do need a budget to travel.

00:29:51.113 --> 00:29:55.605
Well, we've had, obviously, covid, where there were a lot of digital meetings only.

00:29:55.605 --> 00:30:00.771
But that has a flip side also because it's you can say you go to the bar because it's.

00:30:00.771 --> 00:30:04.173
You can say, you, you go to the book up to the bar because it's five o'clock somewhere on the world.

00:30:04.173 --> 00:30:12.037
But yeah, when it's five o'clock in new zealand it's a different time of the day over here in europe, and even different than the us, right.

00:30:12.037 --> 00:30:15.894
So these virtual meetings are not not ideal for standardization work.

00:30:15.914 --> 00:30:27.141
That would I do no, I agree that in-person meetings were especially that because of this discussion and everyone is present in one room, everyone is discussing, it's a different focus.

00:30:27.141 --> 00:30:43.402
I wanted to go back to the national committees because, to close the loop on participation, even if you don't participate in the international meetings, perhaps being a part of your national committee gives you a way to affect the outcomes of the international or the higher tier standards.

00:30:43.402 --> 00:30:48.352
Birgit, you've used the word mirror group before, so let's explain that to the listeners.

00:30:48.805 --> 00:30:51.512
So the mirror group was what we call the Danish standards.

00:30:51.512 --> 00:30:56.676
They had what they called a mirror group to CENTEC 127.

00:30:56.676 --> 00:31:02.798
So that was a group of Danish experts that was discussing before the SENTEC 127 meetings.

00:31:02.798 --> 00:31:18.972
We would look at what was on the agenda, discuss it among us and then what should be our viewpoint from Denmark as we go into these meetings, especially for the bigger meetings like the overall SENTEC 127 or an overall ISO TC92 meeting.

00:31:18.972 --> 00:31:20.296
This is extremely important.

00:31:20.296 --> 00:31:26.036
When you go down into the working groups there you're more there in your capabilities of a technical expert.

00:31:26.036 --> 00:31:33.830
So those details are not always discussed as much in the national mirror committees but depends on what it is.

00:31:33.830 --> 00:31:34.854
Sometimes they are.

00:31:34.854 --> 00:31:46.994
So this is an opportunity for national experts who are not members of the CEN or ISO committee to have an impact on those committees' discussions.

00:31:47.517 --> 00:31:50.728
So it's also a stepping stone for an engineer who would like to participate.

00:31:50.728 --> 00:32:02.530
If you don't have ability to put yourself forward for a CEN committee, if you're coming from a smaller country, like there are no representatives from your country actually you would have a very good shot to be a part of the table.

00:32:02.530 --> 00:32:14.910
But if you're coming from UK or Germany or Poland, even the chances are that the seats are already occupied by someone because there's just so many people and just so few seats on the tables.

00:32:14.910 --> 00:32:26.377
So participating at your country level perhaps gives you this ability to again participate and you still would get all the benefits of networking just within your own country.

00:32:26.377 --> 00:32:26.979
Part right.

00:32:27.338 --> 00:32:33.032
Exactly, and it'll give you an opportunity to show well, I actually have some knowledge here that needs to go into the SEND committee.

00:32:33.032 --> 00:32:43.275
And maybe you can be invited in to start with us as a guest, to present your work to SEND, if need be, et cetera right, if the national committee decides this is of importance to the discussions.

00:32:43.895 --> 00:32:48.529
However, if you would like to do, you have to be a member of an FPA, to be a part of an FPA committee.

00:32:48.529 --> 00:32:49.492
Is this required?

00:32:49.492 --> 00:32:50.355
I don't think so.

00:32:51.267 --> 00:32:52.673
But honestly I'm not 100% sure.

00:32:53.507 --> 00:32:55.513
No Ukraine Law is being invited as a guest.

00:32:56.465 --> 00:33:00.093
So yeah, I'm pretty sure you don't have to be a part to just participate, it's open meeting.

00:33:00.113 --> 00:33:02.436
So you just have to send a message to the chair.

00:33:02.436 --> 00:33:07.144
It's on the website, so just send the message to the chair and then see if you can participate.

00:33:07.144 --> 00:33:15.858
Just notify that you have the intention to participate, because the meetings are open to public, which is nice which is not necessarily the case for stand meetings.

00:33:16.220 --> 00:33:18.268
Okay, we've been advertising this for 30 minutes.

00:33:18.268 --> 00:33:19.410
Let's talk some.

00:33:19.410 --> 00:33:28.330
If someone is excited to join SCN or ISO or NFPA committees, let's talk over what does it come with, because it's also an obligation.

00:33:28.330 --> 00:33:31.555
So let's talk about costs of participation first in time.

00:33:31.555 --> 00:33:33.310
How much time does it really take?

00:33:34.146 --> 00:33:36.355
The vague answer is this varies.

00:33:36.355 --> 00:33:40.054
So take into account, for example, the Eurocodes.

00:33:40.054 --> 00:33:42.021
So this is S dc 250.

00:33:42.021 --> 00:33:47.140
Obviously they have fire parts of fire, dedicated parts in in the euro codes.

00:33:47.140 --> 00:33:48.544
They have been revised.

00:33:48.564 --> 00:33:58.674
They're still in the process of being revised, actually you know one of the the parts still has some equations and formulas in it that I developed that during my ph, phd.

00:33:58.674 --> 00:34:00.199
So that's nice to see.

00:34:00.199 --> 00:34:07.893
So that's how a young researcher eventually ends up in the Eurocodes Just a pathway or a career path.

00:34:07.893 --> 00:34:13.871
But when Eurocodes these big monsters, are in revision, then the underlying working groups.

00:34:13.871 --> 00:34:15.952
They meet very frequently and they do a lot of work.

00:34:15.952 --> 00:34:25.369
So this may be, depending on what it is that you want to have changed in the Eurocode might be a decent part of a day, but it also the other committees.

00:34:25.369 --> 00:34:29.617
There are standards that are being developed but they do not move that fast.

00:34:29.617 --> 00:34:37.418
And then it's like you have a spring and an autumn meeting, one or two days, and then you have some preparatory work as well and maybe some Entire days.

00:34:37.724 --> 00:34:39.050
So that's more or less the idea.

00:34:48.664 --> 00:34:50.990
So the bandwidth is a couple of days per year to a month or so in total.

00:34:50.990 --> 00:34:56.766
Yeah, for me it, when I was very active part of the cn committees for 12 101 standards we had work group 9, work group 5 there that was car parks and transient systems.

00:34:56.766 --> 00:35:00.313
So we would convene two days for one work group, two days for other work group.

00:35:00.313 --> 00:35:05.445
A lot of people were would be in both, so it would be in a whole week pretty much of meetings.

00:35:05.445 --> 00:35:11.885
So you could, you had to fly to a place you have to fly back and that would happen two, three times a year.

00:35:11.885 --> 00:35:16.822
So you would miss out like two, three weeks out of the year for example, nfpa 502.

00:35:16.882 --> 00:35:21.804
So we just finished the the 2023 or was it 2024 vision cycle.

00:35:21.804 --> 00:35:28.490
But then you have like the first public comments, so you address and you capture what Birgitta said.

00:35:28.490 --> 00:35:44.592
You capture all the comments from all over the world, basically, and then you have like a meeting which takes the better part of a week and we've had, I think, three meetings, such meetings, to finish everything and we send it out again for final public comments.

00:35:44.592 --> 00:35:53.039
So we had like three weeks in total, over one and a half years, but then it takes another three years before the next revision comes into play.

00:35:54.164 --> 00:36:03.929
In SFP it's different because it's almost exclusively virtual meetings, so they would be shorter, like having an entire day meetings makes sense when you fly in.

00:36:03.929 --> 00:36:04.949
Everyone comes to.

00:36:04.949 --> 00:36:16.313
It's a big investment to come, so you probably would like to spend many hours if you did this investment and this means the meetings would be shorter but more frequent.

00:36:16.313 --> 00:36:29.097
So when we were in the heat of writing the risk guide or revising it, we would meet within our subcommittees and that would be very frequent, like twice a month, once a month for an extended period of time.

00:36:29.097 --> 00:36:37.701
Drafting a chapter, like a subcommittee would be a chapter of a book and then you would have a meeting of all subcommittees where the chapters would be merged.

00:36:37.701 --> 00:36:39.581
So those were additional meetings.

00:36:39.581 --> 00:36:45.463
So when there was a lot of work, it was a lot of meetings but shorter ones, more frequent.

00:36:48.844 --> 00:36:52.079
I think a golden rule in how much time to spend is if you want to have an impact, you spend the time.

00:36:52.079 --> 00:36:58.255
The more time you spend on preparing, the more impact you will have at the meeting.

00:36:58.255 --> 00:37:17.594
So it's been fascinating sitting in meetings both SEN and ISO and observe those people who are truly prepared for the meeting and what they could actually manage to get through, and then the people who actually hadn't read the documents and didn't realize what was going on around them.

00:37:17.594 --> 00:37:32.961
So if you do commit to this, you have to commit the time and your employer has to agree that you commit the time when I was in an FPA Expo 2019 in San Antonio, I witnessed the grand voting thing of an FPA.

00:37:33.728 --> 00:37:34.972
That was a very interesting thing.

00:37:34.972 --> 00:37:36.490
Can you tell us about this?

00:37:36.490 --> 00:37:43.635
Because we just said about committees how we build up the standards, but in NFPA you also have this mechanism to vote on the changes of the standards.

00:37:43.635 --> 00:37:44.989
Right, it's a big thing.

00:37:45.585 --> 00:37:48.994
We have the technical meeting that happens after our conference and expo.

00:37:48.994 --> 00:37:53.355
Yes, the day after Big meeting, thousands of people with the ability to vote.

00:37:54.911 --> 00:37:58.625
I've never seen thousands of fire people in one room, and they were there.

00:37:58.664 --> 00:38:09.777
Oh yeah, they're there, and that's where things that has been tabled for discussion, you know, or things that has come in that we wanted to amend and so on, can be discussed there.

00:38:09.777 --> 00:38:21.335
Again, I'm not an expert in our process, but I know that that is to me one of the most democratic ways, you know, that people can come in there and they can argue their point and we can vote on it.

00:38:21.335 --> 00:38:34.380
It's like the ICC code process and so on as well, where people can get up to the microphone and talk about their point in a way that we don't see in Sen and ISO, in my view.

00:38:34.380 --> 00:38:35.690
What do you think, Kees?

00:38:36.085 --> 00:38:37.655
Yeah, well, interesting to say that.

00:38:37.655 --> 00:38:39.105
So, in my view, what do you think is?

00:38:39.105 --> 00:38:48.467
Yeah, well, interesting to say that.

00:38:48.467 --> 00:38:52.378
It inspires me to make the comment on the balloting and the weighted balloting that we have in CEN, whereas we do not have a weighted balloting in ISO, for example.

00:38:52.378 --> 00:38:58.713
So in ISO, the vote of Denmark and the vote of the Netherlands weigh as heavy as the vote of the US, for example, but in Europe, in CEN, this is different of the US, for example, but in Europe, in CEN, this is different.

00:38:58.733 --> 00:39:14.195
So France and Germany and also the UK, because they're still a member of CEN, they have a heavy weight, and so the weighted balance is there determined on the basis of, I think it's, the number of inhabitants or the GDP, I don't know, or both, I don't know.

00:39:14.195 --> 00:39:18.474
There's a rule for this, but at least there's a weighted balance.

00:39:18.474 --> 00:39:24.608
So this is nice, and then you can argue whether this is democratic or not, but it's different.

00:39:24.608 --> 00:39:44.936
Transparency and the way the voting is handled in NFPA, aacm and so forth is something to look into, also in CEN and ISO perhaps.

00:39:44.936 --> 00:39:46.893
But this is not necessarily a critique.

00:39:46.893 --> 00:40:02.269
It's to ensure that perhaps in the future we have better ways of dealing with other opinions also in a very late stage of the standards development process also in a very late stage of the of the standards development process.

00:40:02.289 --> 00:40:13.949
Yeah, and uh, you brought me to to the thing that I wanted to discuss, uh, very badly in here, which is the politics in the committees, because, uh, we cannot pretend it's just you know technical discussion and you know smart people arguing on technical knowledge.

00:40:13.949 --> 00:40:15.815
There's a whole bunch of politics.

00:40:15.815 --> 00:40:33.766
But you said a single world can be a market share in in the standard, absolutely, and people who are in those companies, a lot of those people are not not new to that concept, they know that very well and there is a big element of politics in in those committees.

00:40:33.766 --> 00:40:50.878
Everyone has interest, countries have interests, companies have interests and if you can, you know, tie those interests with the standard that becomes the standard of how things are done, the product standard, the design standard, whatever you can assure a win.

00:40:50.878 --> 00:40:55.275
How big part of the committees is there?

00:40:55.275 --> 00:40:57.813
How ready you have to be to deal with that?

00:40:57.813 --> 00:41:00.092
And I don't know how to deal with that.

00:41:00.092 --> 00:41:01.094
That's a difficult question.

00:41:01.565 --> 00:41:02.931
Probably depends on the committee.

00:41:02.931 --> 00:41:06.755
I think some are more political than others.

00:41:06.755 --> 00:41:22.407
I would say that I have participated in several very political committees and, as I mentioned earlier, it almost becomes a game of psychology as well, as you're sitting there observing people who are saying what, why are they talked about?

00:41:22.407 --> 00:41:45.416
Committed participation can be expensive in time and in travel, and who can afford pay for that?

00:41:45.416 --> 00:41:49.648
Often, it's industry who has an interest in this.

00:41:49.648 --> 00:42:10.952
They will invest in this, and this is where we then can risk at getting into unbalanced committees, because they are the ones who then invest in this because they have an interest, whereas others, coming from research institutes, test institutes and so on, might not have the same budget behind them to be able to do this.

00:42:10.952 --> 00:42:17.416
That is one of the biggest challenges, I think, in both CEN and ISO in order to maintain neutrality.

00:42:18.686 --> 00:42:35.099
I would fully agree on that set, and maybe it's a too rosy picture, I don't know, but sooner or later the ship will hit the shore, if that's proper English, because it's a long-haul fight, a long-haul battle, a pale battle.

00:42:35.099 --> 00:43:00.891
If you are a specific industry or a specific stakeholder that wants to get things done in a committee or rule things out in a certain committee, sooner or later you'll find a lot of opposition or you'll find your main competitor or counter arguments on your way, and that might take a year, might take five years, might take 10 years, but sooner or later you can, on short term perhaps, try and gain the system.

00:43:00.891 --> 00:43:09.514
But on the long run I think even the Sandlin ISO system are resilient enough to make sure that the excesses are ruled out.

00:43:09.514 --> 00:43:12.032
But as Brigitte said, I'm fully with you.

00:43:12.032 --> 00:43:19.005
There is a way to gain the system on short term if you spend enough money and if you bring enough arguments to the table.

00:43:19.646 --> 00:43:26.409
But it's not a guarantee that you will see this completely true, because you you will face increasingly opposition.

00:43:26.409 --> 00:43:47.153
Whereas in the past perhaps sharing documents and getting the latest info on everything that happens in the committee was perhaps a bit difficult, nowadays everything is is on internet and you can approach it and you can forward it to your colleagues to gather perhaps additional opinions on shooting things to pieces and so forth.

00:43:47.153 --> 00:43:52.251
So to game the system is increasingly, I think, more difficult, but it's still possible.

00:43:52.251 --> 00:44:10.119
And I think it's up to the people who are more experienced say, like people like Birgitta and I, that we try and prevent this as much as possible, because on the long run it's not good for nobody, not even the industry that has a vested interest, to try and pull things off on the short term.

00:44:10.119 --> 00:44:12.673
It's not good for the entire sector.

00:44:12.673 --> 00:44:14.512
So we should try and rule this out.

00:44:15.626 --> 00:44:17.614
I think it's also a good argument for getting involved.

00:44:17.614 --> 00:44:26.489
The more people are involved there, the more passionate fire engineers are there, People who represent fire science, fire engineering or safety.

00:44:26.489 --> 00:44:31.634
I like to consider myself someone who voices out the voice of safety.

00:44:31.634 --> 00:44:33.391
I'm in for good fire engineering.

00:44:33.391 --> 00:44:37.211
I'm not in for selling a product or getting a market share.

00:44:37.211 --> 00:44:39.313
I'm here to promote good solutions.

00:44:39.313 --> 00:44:44.376
Perhaps it's naive, perhaps it's ambitious, but I like to think about myself like that.

00:44:44.376 --> 00:44:54.132
I think the more people are a part of those committees, the easier it is to, you know, build a front against lobbying, and lobbying sometimes is also okay.

00:44:54.224 --> 00:45:01.735
Sometimes people lobby for good technical solutions to replace solutions that are perhaps not that great, so there's also nothing wrong in that.

00:45:01.735 --> 00:45:09.539
And lobbying to keep status quo is as annoying as lobbying for a specific type of device or a system.

00:45:09.539 --> 00:45:10.059
That's been there.

00:45:10.059 --> 00:45:18.378
One thing that I do not completely understand I've never been a part of TC-127 or ISO TC-92, which are fire safety engineering.

00:45:18.378 --> 00:45:19.864
I've only been a part of TC127 or ISO TC92, which are fire safety engineering.

00:45:19.864 --> 00:45:20.146
Have only been a part of those.

00:45:20.865 --> 00:45:21.628
Sorry to interrupt you.

00:45:21.628 --> 00:45:24.577
Maybe I should correct you because you've mentioned it now a couple of times.

00:45:24.577 --> 00:45:31.458
So TC127 is not only about fire engineering, nor is ISO TC92 only about fire engineering.

00:45:31.458 --> 00:45:36.460
So to go to ISO TC92, for example, it has four subcommittees.

00:45:36.460 --> 00:45:42.434
Subcommittee one is on fire development and fire growth and subcommittee three on environmental aspects.

00:45:42.434 --> 00:45:44.813
So those were the committees that Perdita was in.

00:45:44.813 --> 00:45:51.376
I was more coming from the fire resistance side, so that's subcommittee two, on competition.

00:45:51.376 --> 00:45:55.876
And subcommittee four and ISO is actually devoted to fire engineering.

00:45:55.876 --> 00:45:58.813
So it's more than fire engineering.

00:45:58.853 --> 00:45:59.134
Of course.

00:45:59.134 --> 00:46:02.971
Yeah, sorry for that, it's a shortcut in my head.

00:46:02.971 --> 00:46:07.474
What I wanted to contrast is products versus methods or design.

00:46:07.474 --> 00:46:20.735
I know ways of designing stuff, so is there an inherent difference in committees that developed standards for products versus committees that developed standards for like designing stuff Like Euroodes?

00:46:20.735 --> 00:46:22.338
Is design not a product, right?

00:46:22.860 --> 00:46:30.766

191 - Committee participation with Birgitte Messerschmidt and Kees Both

Listen On

Recent Episodes