March 12, 2025

192 - Fire Fundamentals pt. 14 - Jet fan systems for car parks

192 - Fire Fundamentals pt. 14 - Jet fan systems for car parks
The player is loading ...
Fire Science Show

Jet-fan systems effectively control smoke in car parks by creating directed airflows that transport smoke from one point to another, similar to how longitudinal ventilation works in tunnels. These systems offer cost-effectiveness and simplicity by eliminating ductwork while providing powerful smoke management capabilities when properly designed and understood.

• Jet Fans create momentum transfer through air entrainment rather than directly moving smoke
• Two distinct operational modes exist: smoke clearance (reducing thermal stress) and smoke control (maintaining clear firefighter access)
• Systems require careful balancing of extraction capacity with Jet Fan thrust force
• Optimal design typically requires CFD modeling followed by hot smoke testing for verification
• Jet Fan activation timing presents challenges for evacuation - usually delayed until occupants exit
• Systems excel in tunnel-like geometries but struggle with complex layouts (the "Tetris rule")
• Particularly effective against heavier-than-air gases like LPG or EV battery fire emissions
• European standards now available through EN 12101 family for design guidance

If you need design assistance with Jet Fan systems for your projects, email me directly at w.wegrzynski@itb.pl. 

Further reading:

- Jet-Fan Systems in Car Parks Design Methods: an Overview and Assessment of Performance

- Our in-depth multiparametric study on car park ventilation

- A. Król and M. Król, Study on numerical modeling of jet fans

- Thunderhead's guide to modelling jet-fans in FDS




Fire Science Show has been named the top podcast in Fire Protection and Safety by Feedspot. Check the list below, and you will also discover a lot more podcasts in our space!

https://podcast.feedspot.com/fire_protection_and_safety_podcasts/

Thank you for your continuous support, and to the OFR for making it possible to create this content!

----
The Fire Science Show is produced by the Fire Science Media in collaboration with OFR Consultants. Thank you to the podcast sponsor for their continuous support towards our mission.

Chapters

01:48 - Introduction to JetFan Systems

04:06 - What is a JetFan System?

09:25 - Clearance vs. Smoke Control

13:13 - System Components and Operation

20:26 - Velocity Requirements and Space Impact

27:20 - Design Challenges and Evacuation Considerations

34:24 - CFD Modeling and Testing

37:51 - Design Factors and Final Remarks

Transcript
WEBVTT

00:00:00.541 --> 00:00:02.208
Hello everybody, welcome to the Fire Science Show.

00:00:02.208 --> 00:00:08.173
You know that I love exposing engineers to fire science and I like to do it otherwise as well.

00:00:08.173 --> 00:00:18.592
I love to expose my fellow fire scientists to some solid fire safety engineering concepts that go probably a little bit deeper than what's mostly thought at different universities.

00:00:18.592 --> 00:00:22.731
And some time ago I've published an episode on pressurization systems in stairwells.

00:00:22.731 --> 00:00:23.870
It was well received.

00:00:23.870 --> 00:00:24.760
A lot of people commented.

00:00:24.760 --> 00:00:32.070
It made me organize like 20 different private meetings with people, so a lot of you have enjoyed that episode.

00:00:32.109 --> 00:00:42.887
I thought let's share another piece of technology that I think in Poland is way, way, way more popular than in other parts of the world and that is the Jetfan systems in car parks.

00:00:42.887 --> 00:00:45.353
I like car parks, I like Jetfan systems.

00:00:45.353 --> 00:00:51.250
They are a big part of my professional career, even before I have became a fire scientist.

00:00:51.250 --> 00:00:55.947
First I was an engineer designing them, later I became a scientist studying them.

00:00:55.947 --> 00:01:02.533
So yeah, I've seen some car parks and I would love to share with you the experience that I've gained over the years.

00:01:02.533 --> 00:01:05.254
Jetfan systems they have mixed opinions.

00:01:05.254 --> 00:01:11.451
Some people swear by them that it's the best ventilation system you can have in a car park.

00:01:11.451 --> 00:01:13.203
I believe they are a very good solution.

00:01:13.203 --> 00:01:28.087
If you understand what you want to achieve and if you're realistic about the goals that you want to achieve and you're very mindful about what is the expected outcome of the system operation, you can have a very, very good system for very, very good money.

00:01:28.087 --> 00:01:32.027
And those who don't believe in them well, they simply don't believe in them.

00:01:32.027 --> 00:01:36.242
I don't think engineering systems are stuff that you either believe or not believe in.

00:01:36.242 --> 00:01:42.284
I think it should be discussed on engineering grounds, and this is what we're going to do in this podcast episode.

00:01:42.284 --> 00:01:43.528
So stay with me.

00:01:43.528 --> 00:01:45.492
Let's spin the intro and jump into the episode.

00:01:49.921 --> 00:01:51.466
Welcome to the Firesize Show.

00:01:51.466 --> 00:01:54.981
My name is Wojciech Wigrzyński and I will be your host.

00:01:54.981 --> 00:02:18.072
This podcast is brought to you in collaboration with Ofar Consultants, a multi-award-winning independent consultancy dedicated to addressing fire safety challenges.

00:02:18.072 --> 00:02:29.734
Established in the UK in 2016 as a startup business of two highly experienced fire engineering consultants, the business has grown phenomenally to eight offices across the country, from Edinburgh to Bath.

00:02:29.734 --> 00:02:39.240
Colleagues are on a mission to continually explore the challenges that fire creates for clients and society, applying the best research experience and diligence for effective, tailored solution.

00:02:39.240 --> 00:02:43.230
In 2025, there will be new opportunities to work with OFR.

00:02:43.230 --> 00:02:51.110
Ofr will grow its team once more and is keen to hear from industry professionals who would like to collaborate on fire safety features this year.

00:02:51.110 --> 00:02:54.147
Get in touch at ofrconsultantscom.

00:02:54.147 --> 00:02:55.411
Okay, let's go.

00:02:55.560 --> 00:02:58.729
So first question what the hell is a JetFan system?

00:02:58.729 --> 00:03:02.090
Well, it's a system that employs JetFans.

00:03:02.090 --> 00:03:13.473
Jetfan is an axial ventilator, not a very large one, that you put underneath the ceiling of your car park and it simply blows air forward.

00:03:13.473 --> 00:03:24.550
They're like those tubes that you see on the cover of the episode that you install underneath your car park ceiling to transport air through your car park and with that air you transport smoke through your car park.

00:03:24.550 --> 00:03:32.133
It's a very interesting way of operation, very similar to the operation of longitudinal systems in road tunnels.

00:03:32.133 --> 00:03:55.835
Actually, from what I've learned, the jet fans were introduced by a company, novenco, in 1990s, and one of the directors in that company, rudvan Beke, is a good friend of mine and I've spent more than a decade working with him, and I've been told a story that they just thought that perhaps the same idea of operation as you would have in a road tunnel could be actually employed in a car park.

00:03:55.835 --> 00:04:03.293
If we could blow the smoke through the car park in a way like you blow away candles on your birthday cake.

00:04:03.293 --> 00:04:04.514
Perhaps that would work.

00:04:04.514 --> 00:04:06.180
They've tried and actually it worked.

00:04:06.180 --> 00:04:14.507
They developed a solution for that called the jetfan Carpark jetfan and this has been since then a common solution used in the Netherlands.

00:04:15.068 --> 00:04:16.740
It's a very common solution in Poland.

00:04:16.740 --> 00:04:19.750
I know that those systems are used all around the world.

00:04:19.750 --> 00:04:25.569
I said mixed opinions and also legislations show that mixed opinions.

00:04:25.569 --> 00:04:27.286
In some countries it's possible to use them.

00:04:27.286 --> 00:04:29.307
In some countries it is not possible to use them.

00:04:29.307 --> 00:04:42.353
But in general, instead of extracting your smoke upwards through a layer of ducts, you simply blow smoke from one point to another and happily extract it at the end of the pathway where you are blowing at it.

00:04:42.353 --> 00:04:44.307
It's a very simple concept of operation.

00:04:44.920 --> 00:04:47.730
Now, I said those systems are popular in Poland.

00:04:47.730 --> 00:04:53.449
There's also a story behind that and it's kind of funny, like how a wrong legislation builds a market for you.

00:04:53.449 --> 00:05:06.752
So in Poland, before 2009, I believe, we had a law that said that in a car park of a specific size, you are required to have extraction point every 10 meters.

00:05:06.752 --> 00:05:09.228
This was made for duct systems.

00:05:09.228 --> 00:05:17.952
You need an extraction point every 10 meters and because jet fan systems obviously do not have ducts, you don't have extraction points.

00:05:17.952 --> 00:05:23.069
So whenever someone came and wanted to make a ductless system.

00:05:23.069 --> 00:05:25.814
They were called the ductless systems back then, the jet fan systems.

00:05:25.814 --> 00:05:38.086
You actually had to apply for a national derogation from that and to get that you had to run some CFD simulations to prove that your concept is actually working on par with the traditional system.

00:05:38.086 --> 00:05:40.620
And boy, that has built the industry in Poland.

00:05:40.620 --> 00:05:46.963
And my institute, itb, also participated in that early Russia for CFD simulations in compact systems.

00:05:46.963 --> 00:05:50.607
And well, that's kind of how we got answers fluent for our simulations.

00:05:50.911 --> 00:05:57.927
If anyone wondered how we can afford that, it was the golden era of Jetfan systems that enabled us to do that.

00:05:57.927 --> 00:06:05.685
But anyway, the Jetfan systems stoned Poland because at that time it was very expensive to build the duct systems.

00:06:05.685 --> 00:06:13.983
There were not that many approved systems, they were in general very expensive and for jet fun systems you did not need any ducts.

00:06:13.983 --> 00:06:28.225
Therefore you saved a ton of money in your buildings and usually the savings on the jet fun were sufficient to pay for the CFD, additional engineering, all the hassle, and you would still save some.

00:06:28.725 --> 00:06:29.949
Since then it has changed.

00:06:29.949 --> 00:06:31.940
The duct system also evolved.

00:06:31.940 --> 00:06:36.050
There are so many new solutions that you can use in your car products.

00:06:36.050 --> 00:06:42.422
I'm not sure if this economic argument still holds, but there are still benefits, other than economic, for use of jetfan systems.

00:06:42.422 --> 00:06:57.567
Now, as we're talking about jetfan systems, it's necessary to put it straight, like what they can do, what they cannot do, and I think this is the most fundamental problem people have with jetfans they don't understand what you can do with the system and sometimes they have wrong expectations.

00:06:58.048 --> 00:07:07.822
So in our book on designing jetfan systems in for polish market 2015, we've defined two ways of operation of the jet fan system.

00:07:07.822 --> 00:07:14.382
One we call the clearance it's inspired by the British nomenclature and one we call the smoke control.

00:07:14.382 --> 00:07:38.942
In a clearance system, what you want to achieve with your jet fan system is to remove the majority of hot gases from your car park and significantly reduce the thermal stress you impose on the structure and on the people in the car park by blowing air through the fire, through the smoke layer and removing the smoke with the air and, first and foremost, mixing all of that together.

00:07:38.942 --> 00:07:49.250
And in this clearance system, you would not care about the visibility of the fire source, so you would expect that there could be a whole smoke control compartment full with smoke.

00:07:49.250 --> 00:08:00.894
So basically, you're focused on reducing the hazards coming from the heat and after the fire, when, when the fire is extinguished, this system will will very quickly manage to clear the car park from the smoke.

00:08:00.894 --> 00:08:02.480
Hence the name smoke clearance.

00:08:03.081 --> 00:08:04.886
In smoke control it's different.

00:08:04.886 --> 00:08:07.952
It's more like longitudinal ventilation in the tunnels.

00:08:07.952 --> 00:08:15.689
So you would like to have a sharp boundary between the space in which there is smoke and space in which there is no smoke.

00:08:15.689 --> 00:08:20.879
So you'd really want to stop the smoke at the level where the fire is Like.

00:08:20.879 --> 00:08:24.370
You would create a wall of air that's impenetrable for the smoke.

00:08:24.370 --> 00:08:25.685
So always coming from the fresh air side, you would see the fire.

00:08:25.685 --> 00:08:26.312
You would create a wall of air that's impenetrable for the smoke.

00:08:26.312 --> 00:08:28.235
So always coming from the fresh air side, you would see the fire.

00:08:28.235 --> 00:08:29.817
You would, you would be able to reach it.

00:08:29.817 --> 00:08:33.505
In fact, there are some criteria defined in the new ian standard.

00:08:33.505 --> 00:08:37.261
I was also very pleased to participate in that standard writing.

00:08:37.942 --> 00:08:41.450
Shout out to the previous episode on the committees.

00:08:41.450 --> 00:08:47.652
Perhaps that made the link in my brain to do the jet fan episode, because the jet fan committee is the one I've spent the most time in.

00:08:47.652 --> 00:08:51.750
Anyway, you want to have a wall of air that's clear.

00:08:51.750 --> 00:08:58.369
The smoke is stopped, literally at a line almost, and you have an access to the fire.

00:08:58.369 --> 00:09:01.328
There are more ways you can distinguish those systems.

00:09:01.328 --> 00:09:05.068
Some of them should include for human evacuation.

00:09:05.068 --> 00:09:09.149
This is very challenging in jet fun systems and we'll come back to that in this podcast episode.

00:09:09.149 --> 00:09:12.145
Some of them are meant just as a tool to assist firefighting.

00:09:12.145 --> 00:09:16.205
Some of them are just meant as a tool to clear the car park after the fire from the smoke.

00:09:16.647 --> 00:09:28.975
So there are many ways to cut this cake and it's important that your expectations are set beforehand, especially in regards of the clearance and control, because that's going to have large differences.

00:09:28.975 --> 00:09:31.467
Now where do those differences would come?

00:09:31.467 --> 00:09:35.851
How does the smoke clearance system differ from the smoke control system?

00:09:35.851 --> 00:09:41.230
The main thing comes down to the volumetric capacity of your extraction shafts.

00:09:41.230 --> 00:09:43.807
Pretty much, I would say that's the defining factor.

00:09:43.807 --> 00:09:48.828
So how much air in the end you're capable of extracting from the car park?

00:09:49.299 --> 00:10:02.586
Obviously, for smoke control you need more air than for smoke clearance, because you care about moving all the smoke, not just most of the smoke, and the differences in velocities that you need to achieve in a car park are quite significant.

00:10:02.586 --> 00:10:12.261
Usually, for smoke control in a car park of a height of, let's say, three meters, what you would be aiming for is approximately 0.9, maybe one meter per second.

00:10:12.261 --> 00:10:13.465
That usually would be sufficient.

00:10:13.465 --> 00:10:22.804
If you have average velocity like that in the cross-section of your car park, you should be able to achieve the smoke control operation really, and that's very low velocities.

00:10:22.804 --> 00:10:30.662
If you look at tunnels, we're talking about two and a half, three and a half meter per second.

00:10:30.662 --> 00:10:32.826
Here just around one meter per second would be sufficient for smoke clearance.

00:10:32.826 --> 00:10:35.852
This velocity would be perhaps lower, maybe as low as 0.5, 0.6 meter per second.

00:10:35.852 --> 00:10:45.095
Those numbers sounds very low, but if you multiply them by the cross section of your car park, you have one meter per second.

00:10:45.095 --> 00:10:47.708
Your car park is 32 meters wide.

00:10:47.708 --> 00:10:49.386
You have three meters of height.

00:10:49.386 --> 00:10:52.860
Suddenly you have 96 cubic meters per second to remove.

00:10:52.980 --> 00:10:59.951
If you want to have an average of one meter per second in that car park, 100 cubic meters per second, that's quite a big system already.

00:10:59.951 --> 00:11:05.773
That means you need at least 10 square meters of extraction shaft in your building.

00:11:05.773 --> 00:11:09.591
You will need 10 square meters of your inlet shaft in your building.

00:11:09.591 --> 00:11:14.631
This means you just lost 20 square meters of leasable area on every floor of your building.

00:11:14.631 --> 00:11:18.890
So yeah, that's where expenses come in in the safety systems.

00:11:18.890 --> 00:11:30.590
People often think that the expensive part of your systems are the systems that you're designing, but no, really the expensive part is the space they take and the cables that you need to plug them in.

00:11:30.590 --> 00:11:34.951
Anyway, those differences in velocities going up from 0.6 to 1 meter.

00:11:34.951 --> 00:11:53.988
What will happen is that you will start removing more and more air, you will start clearing more and more of your car park and eventually you will reach that point where you have a wall of air that prevents any backfiring of the smoke, that prevents the movement of the smoke back upwind and will protect your car park a low, free path of entry.

00:11:54.469 --> 00:12:07.041
Now there's also one thing about jet systems that made them so popular in here is that in poland we had a lot of lpg powered vehicles and that's a very popular alternative fuel used in Poland for decades.

00:12:07.041 --> 00:12:15.908
And LPG is a nasty thing because if it spills in your car park from your vehicle, it's heavier than air, so it would spill along your floor.

00:12:15.908 --> 00:12:20.085
So the normal duct systems were not that effective on removing that.

00:12:20.085 --> 00:12:31.280
You would have to have separate grills closer to your floor to remove that Very challenging remove that very challenging design, very expensive design, and with jetfan systems you just mix the air through the entire cross-section of your car park.

00:12:31.280 --> 00:12:32.725
So you're very effectively.

00:12:32.725 --> 00:12:46.090
We can remove hazards like like lpg and perhaps in the age of electric vehicles we also see there are clouds forming with gases that are obviously heavier than air because they are spilling along the floor.

00:12:46.090 --> 00:12:57.168
So I would assume the operation of jet fan system would also be quite good against those, especially if you design the smoke control mode where your people would not be exposed to any smoke from the electric vehicle.

00:12:57.168 --> 00:13:00.590
Anyway, you don't need fire to benefit from that.

00:13:01.179 --> 00:13:03.386
Car parks means vehicles operating in them.

00:13:03.386 --> 00:13:06.969
That means a lot of fumes, that means a lot of gases already in the car park.

00:13:06.969 --> 00:13:10.669
So they are also great for sanitary mode operations.

00:13:10.669 --> 00:13:12.828
Very cheap, very comfortable.

00:13:12.828 --> 00:13:17.519
You need perhaps 0.2, 0.3 meter per second and you're good with those operations.

00:13:17.519 --> 00:13:23.312
So sometimes they would be run on a low energy setting just to clear the car park from the fumes from the cars.

00:13:24.164 --> 00:13:27.306
Next thing about JetVent systems that you can have different systems.

00:13:27.306 --> 00:13:38.368
You could have a system in a completely open car park like imagine hundreds of meters of car park without any walls, without any boundaries, just a set of columns and a massive building above them.

00:13:38.368 --> 00:13:39.792
We've done car parks like that.

00:13:39.792 --> 00:13:48.408
Or you could have car parks that are literally a collection of smaller compartments, few hundred square meters each, and from one compartment you go to another, to another, to another.

00:13:48.408 --> 00:13:57.695
That's a popular way to design the car parks in Belgium, for example, and in that case in a very large car park you would like to have most of the car park empty, free of smoke.

00:13:57.774 --> 00:14:11.520
With your JetFan system we would usually design the smoke control compartments with a size of up to two and a half thousand meter square, perhaps up to five thousand square meter if it's really really challenging project with a massive car park.

00:14:11.520 --> 00:14:13.004
But that comes with additional cost.

00:14:13.004 --> 00:14:18.104
So that would be our usual design for compartments in those large car parks.

00:14:18.104 --> 00:14:21.942
You'd also like to have the system reversible so it can go both directions.

00:14:21.942 --> 00:14:25.312
So you always extract to the shaft closer to the fire.

00:14:26.081 --> 00:14:33.828
And if it's really really large car park and you have to separate it into multiple smoke compartments, not always you have to put physical boundaries between them.

00:14:33.828 --> 00:14:38.427
Sometimes it's possible to create those invisible walls with just the jet fan system operation.

00:14:38.427 --> 00:14:40.307
But again that's another challenge.

00:14:40.307 --> 00:14:47.005
For smaller compartments there is a strategy where you would just transport the smoke from one compartment to another with the JetVan system.

00:14:47.005 --> 00:14:50.562
So it's also like an interesting way of operation not very popular in here.

00:14:51.245 --> 00:14:55.173
And finally, a lot will depend on your inlets and outlets.

00:14:55.173 --> 00:15:00.879
The easiest is if you have open facades and you have, like, unlimited source of air on one facade.

00:15:00.879 --> 00:15:04.625
You have unlimited extraction space on your external facade.

00:15:04.625 --> 00:15:14.788
Then you can make a really efficient, really cheap jet vent system that will beat any other smoke control way really, and they can also beat the wind quite easily.

00:15:14.788 --> 00:15:26.451
Actually, I've had an episode about open car parks with wind a year ago and we've noted that if you just have an open car park, in some wind scenarios you get very bad conditions inside the car park in fire.

00:15:26.451 --> 00:15:33.312
With JetFan systems in such an open car park I would assume 95% of scenarios you would easily beat the wind.

00:15:33.312 --> 00:15:40.289
It's something that we are currently researching so I can just tell you work-in, work in progress results, but it's looking very promising.

00:15:40.309 --> 00:15:42.962
Jetfan systems are really good enhancement for open car parks.

00:15:42.962 --> 00:15:45.107
For wind conditions in particular.

00:15:45.107 --> 00:15:49.342
If you have an enclosed car park, you need an extraction shaft.

00:15:49.342 --> 00:15:56.927
You need an air inlet shaft because you need to supply the air that you're extracting and this is when it becomes challenging.

00:15:56.927 --> 00:16:06.306
The inlets and outlets can become quite large if you need large quantities of air and you also cannot really supply air with too high velocity.

00:16:06.306 --> 00:16:13.730
So every time you think about it, if you supply air with high velocity, the air has some kinetic energy in it.

00:16:13.730 --> 00:16:14.714
Inevitably.

00:16:14.714 --> 00:16:21.270
If you supply air with 5 meters per second 10 meters per second that's a lot of kinetic energy the air will fly very, very far.

00:16:21.270 --> 00:16:27.471
And in jet-fed system we need to direct air through a very specific pathway to clear the car park from the smoke.

00:16:27.471 --> 00:16:41.831
If I have a very strong stream of air, I need to use a lot of force to push that jet stream in the place where I want it to be, and in most cases it's even impossible if you have more than five meters per second inlet.

00:16:41.831 --> 00:16:47.889
So the inlet strategy in the JetFan system will be as important as your extraction strategy.

00:16:48.510 --> 00:16:57.836
Okay, now let's go to some technicalities of JetFan systems and shortly after we'll go into scenarios, because that's perhaps the most controversial part of a jet fan system design.

00:16:57.836 --> 00:17:14.125
So for components you would have your inlet and extraction fans, that those would be a very large, usually axial fans that operate for even hundreds of cubic meters per second that provide you the air supply and extraction from your car park.

00:17:14.125 --> 00:17:15.930
They obviously need to be fire rated.

00:17:15.930 --> 00:17:21.530
It's best if they're reversible, so you can have two directions of operation of your JetFan system.

00:17:21.530 --> 00:17:23.482
In that way they are the most useful.

00:17:23.482 --> 00:17:31.309
And other way to define the JetFan systems, whether they are one directional or reversible you also need JetFans obviously.

00:17:31.309 --> 00:17:33.844
Jetfans would also be axial fans.

00:17:33.844 --> 00:17:37.397
They will also be fire rated and they are usually in Europe.

00:17:37.397 --> 00:17:43.271
They're tested according to EN 12101, part three, a very important standards that actually includes.

00:17:43.311 --> 00:17:48.509
For jet fans, they are tested within furnaces like normal fans would be.

00:17:48.509 --> 00:17:50.894
Well, not exactly like normal fans.

00:17:50.894 --> 00:17:53.569
Normal fans would have an installation connected to the furnace.

00:17:53.569 --> 00:18:00.946
You would extract this hot gases from your furnace, transfer them through your fan and that's how you would expose it to temperature.

00:18:00.946 --> 00:18:13.089
For jet fans, we simply hang them inside the furnace, we set the temperature on the oven to 400 degrees and they operate 15 minutes later, shut them down two minutes, wait, turn them on again and let's go.

00:18:13.089 --> 00:18:17.911
They have to survive the remaining time for the specific class that they are exposed to.

00:18:17.911 --> 00:18:21.166
Very nice experiment that I'm very used to.

00:18:21.166 --> 00:18:23.471
I used to be doing a lot of those now.

00:18:23.471 --> 00:18:30.332
One thing that actually I I took off my table very few of those is is the the component testing.

00:18:30.332 --> 00:18:32.520
I'm not doing those that much anymore.

00:18:32.820 --> 00:18:35.923
Um, and there will be auxiliary components in the jet fan system.

00:18:35.923 --> 00:18:38.244
Sometimes you would use some smoke curtains.

00:18:38.244 --> 00:18:41.548
They could be a part of your smoke control strategy.

00:18:41.548 --> 00:18:52.615
You of course, need to supply power to your jet fans, so you need some sort of cabinets, smoke control panels to steer the jet fans, to trigger the correct jet fans at the correct time.

00:18:52.615 --> 00:18:54.396
You would need smoke detection.

00:18:54.396 --> 00:19:01.269
Some people ask me how the hell the jet fan knows that there's a fire in the car park and it has to have a smoke detection system.

00:19:01.269 --> 00:19:04.931
You need to trigger it with something, preferably automatically.

00:19:04.931 --> 00:19:07.047
So there needs to be smoke detection.

00:19:07.047 --> 00:19:12.465
There needs to be some redundant power source, usually there, and that would be pretty much it.

00:19:12.465 --> 00:19:14.806
Those are fairly simple systems in the end.

00:19:15.327 --> 00:19:20.987
The jet fans themselves they are characterized not by flow, like normally you would think about a ventilator.

00:19:20.987 --> 00:19:25.125
You would like to quantify the ventilator by the flow that it has.

00:19:25.125 --> 00:19:29.824
In case of a jet fan, we use a different property In jet fan systems.

00:19:29.824 --> 00:19:32.071
We talk about the thrust of the jet fan.

00:19:32.071 --> 00:19:41.648
So you can calculate the thrust if you multiply the air density by the velocity in the jet fan by the volumetric capacity of the jet fan.

00:19:41.648 --> 00:19:52.230
That's an approximation of the thrust of the jet fan and for car park systems we would normally get jet fans that would be 35 newton to perhaps 55 newton for axial fans.

00:19:52.230 --> 00:19:58.393
And there are also those centrifugal fans that could have like 100, 110 newton thrust force.

00:19:58.393 --> 00:20:12.813
In comparison, jet fans used in road tunnels those would have, like I'm using, 950 newton to 1,600 newton, but I've seen on the market that there would be jet fans with 2,800 newton thrusts.

00:20:12.813 --> 00:20:18.188
And if you want a really interesting comparison, the engine of Boeing Dreamliner.

00:20:18.188 --> 00:20:22.315
There's this massive turbojet engine that powers the airplane.

00:20:22.315 --> 00:20:24.548
That one has like 100,000 newton thrust.

00:20:24.548 --> 00:20:30.686
So that's pretty far away from our little jet fans, but the same family nevertheless.

00:20:30.686 --> 00:20:32.807
Anyway, why thrust?

00:20:33.039 --> 00:20:38.592
Thrust is a very good measure because it allows you to calculate how much force you can pass to the air.

00:20:38.592 --> 00:20:43.830
In your carport, a rule of thumb you have 100 square meters of cross-section.

00:20:43.830 --> 00:20:48.349
You want to express one pascal dynamic pressure on that.

00:20:48.349 --> 00:20:49.192
You need 100 newtons.

00:20:49.192 --> 00:20:51.588
Of course that's an extreme simplification.

00:20:51.588 --> 00:20:57.173
You cannot really do engineering calculations like that, but it gives you an idea of how much force you need.

00:20:57.173 --> 00:21:03.292
There will be losses, there will be inefficiencies in how the momentum is transferred to the air.

00:21:03.940 --> 00:21:06.465
Another thing about jet fans is how do they act.

00:21:06.465 --> 00:21:21.192
A lot of people would have the misconception that the jet fan sucks the smoke at one end and releases the smoke on the other end, therefore pushing the smoke further away, and this, like it could look like that when they operate.

00:21:21.192 --> 00:21:25.299
But this is not really the fundamental principle on which they operate.

00:21:25.299 --> 00:21:32.388
The jet fans are more like your hair dryer, hand dryer or those annoying leaf blowers.

00:21:32.388 --> 00:21:53.248
The idea is that you want to push a stream of air at very high velocity into the car park that, through entrainment, exchanges momentum with the surrounding air, with air that surrounds it, and eventually you have a much bigger mass of air but a much lower velocity.

00:21:53.248 --> 00:22:04.583
So you kind of transfer the momentum from the blades in your jet fan into the air, into the jet fan, and that high velocity stream released from the jet fan transfers the momentum through the surrounding air.

00:22:04.583 --> 00:22:09.433
Now it takes a lot of space for this momentum transfer to happen.

00:22:09.433 --> 00:22:16.743
It would take, I would say, 20, 30 meters of space in front of your jet fan for this momentum to fully, fully happen.

00:22:16.743 --> 00:22:29.611
And this means that the jet, if you have a fire at one location in a car park, the jet van that really is acting on that location is not the one above the fire but the one 30 meters before the fire.

00:22:29.611 --> 00:22:35.094
That's the jet van that will create the uniform velocity distribution that you are looking for.

00:22:35.094 --> 00:22:38.567
So the jet vans operate much further than they are.

00:22:38.839 --> 00:22:43.192
It's a very wrong misconception that they operate at the location where they are hanged.

00:22:43.192 --> 00:22:53.963
You would space them so you cover most of the car park with the low velocity flow that you're creating by their operation.

00:22:53.963 --> 00:22:58.534
So they would be horizontally spaced by 8 to 12 meters.

00:22:58.534 --> 00:23:03.468
In the direction of the operation they would be spaced by 32 to 48 meters.

00:23:03.468 --> 00:23:14.588
From my experience, those are the optimal distances and if you can make a nice grid of jet fans in your rectangular car park like this, you're going to have a very good system.

00:23:15.119 --> 00:23:24.606
Well, there obviously are challenges if the geometry of your car park is complicated, especially if you have a central core of the building inside the car park.

00:23:24.606 --> 00:23:27.680
So this is a common way to design buildings.

00:23:27.680 --> 00:23:31.806
You would have a square cut in the ground and you would have a central core.

00:23:31.806 --> 00:23:37.140
So you have a square car park and those are very challenging to ventilate.

00:23:37.140 --> 00:23:38.454
With JetFan systems it takes a lot very challenging to ventilate with jet fan systems.

00:23:38.454 --> 00:23:39.681
It takes a lot of work to optimize them.

00:23:39.681 --> 00:23:40.746
Still possible, though.

00:23:40.746 --> 00:23:44.729
Now another common question that I ask, like how strong they are?

00:23:44.729 --> 00:23:47.547
How big jet fans do I need to ventilate my car park?

00:23:47.547 --> 00:23:50.509
And actually it's a design decision.

00:23:50.509 --> 00:23:56.393
You need to get those jet fans to an operational point where it's optimal for your car park.

00:23:56.393 --> 00:23:58.587
We've done those studies in the past.

00:23:58.587 --> 00:23:59.863
I'll link them in the show notes.

00:24:00.423 --> 00:24:12.486
If you actually have too many jet fans, you will observe a very interesting phenomenon you move more air than you're capable of extracting and because there's kinetic energy in that air, it has to go somewhere.

00:24:12.486 --> 00:24:24.375
So we often see that if you use too many jet fans, the air will kind of bounce back, or the smoke will kind of bounce back from the walls and will return to the place which you wanted to protect from the smoke.

00:24:24.375 --> 00:24:28.411
So actually, so not enough and too much are both very bad in jet design.

00:24:28.411 --> 00:24:37.335
If you end up like this, with air crawling back to the location of your inlets, for example, you will eventually end up with a car park that's completely overfilled with smoke.

00:24:37.335 --> 00:24:41.189
Again, if you are designing smoke clearance system, perhaps that's acceptable.

00:24:41.189 --> 00:24:46.211
If you're designing smoke control system and you really want a clear path of entry for firefighters.

00:24:46.211 --> 00:24:48.943
This is definitely not acceptable.

00:24:49.164 --> 00:24:59.112
It's a very difficult art of balancing the extraction rate and the jet fin locations, placement and numbers of jet fans that operate.

00:24:59.112 --> 00:25:08.873
That truly is something I would call an engineer's art and it's something that makes designing jet fan systems good jet fan systems really, really challenging.

00:25:08.873 --> 00:25:20.679
That's the design difference between a good and bad jet fan system One that balances the number of jet fans, the thrust with the extraction and inlet capabilities, one that balanced the number of jet fans, the thrust with the extraction and inlet capabilities.

00:25:20.679 --> 00:25:25.045
And the other one would just randomly pick a number of extraction inlet, drop some jet fans.

00:25:25.045 --> 00:25:26.248
That's usually not a good design.

00:25:26.248 --> 00:25:32.048
Now let's move to the scenario of operation, because that's the source of some controversy around the jet fan systems.

00:25:32.569 --> 00:25:40.928
As I told at the beginning of the episode, you can have them to help you with evacuation, you can have them to help you with firefighting and boy, this is a challenging thing.

00:25:40.928 --> 00:25:47.733
So if you operate jet fans, they will transfer the air through the entire cross section of your car park.

00:25:47.733 --> 00:25:49.266
That's how they work.

00:25:49.266 --> 00:25:51.307
That's how they are supposed to work.

00:25:51.307 --> 00:25:53.227
That's the effect that you are looking for.

00:25:53.227 --> 00:26:02.575
Actually, that's the reason why you are designing your ventilators in the car park you want to transport the gases and air through the entire cross-section of your car park.

00:26:02.575 --> 00:26:12.031
Now, if you do that, inevitably the smoke will fill the entire height of the car park, from the very bottom of the car park to the very ceiling of the car park.

00:26:12.031 --> 00:26:16.585
You will be transporting smoke through the entirety of the cross-section of your car car park.

00:26:16.585 --> 00:26:18.568
That's how you wanted it to be.

00:26:19.009 --> 00:26:26.470
If you have people in that layer, they will lose visibility and it will be very challenging for them to evacuate.

00:26:26.470 --> 00:26:32.493
They would probably not be exposed to high temperatures, which would be lethal, um, for toxic gas concentrations.

00:26:32.493 --> 00:26:40.092
Uh, depends on the source, really, but visibility is something you will 99% lose.

00:26:40.092 --> 00:26:46.861
There's almost no way to maintain visibility in a layer of smoke behind the source of the fire in the jet fan system.

00:26:46.861 --> 00:26:57.023
Therefore, if you want to evacuate people from the car park, usually you'd need to delay the operation of the jet fans for the time it takes people to evacuate.

00:26:57.585 --> 00:27:01.210
Luckily, car parks are fairly easy to evacuate.

00:27:01.210 --> 00:27:08.871
They're usually because of the way, the reason we build car parks they have to be convenient to leave your vehicle and go away.

00:27:08.871 --> 00:27:14.131
They have ample exit spaces usually and the evacuation there would not be that many people inside the car park.

00:27:14.131 --> 00:27:17.185
They would hopefully not be sleeping, so there's good chances.

00:27:17.185 --> 00:27:17.971
The evacuation can be fairly swift in the car park.

00:27:17.971 --> 00:27:18.375
They would hopefully not be sleeping, so there's good chances.

00:27:18.375 --> 00:27:23.828
The evacuation can be fairly swift in the car park and from my experience it usually ends within four or five minutes.

00:27:23.828 --> 00:27:32.247
That's pretty much the max we get in most of the car parks, but for that time you probably should not operate your jet fans.

00:27:32.247 --> 00:27:41.593
And that's the controversy, that there's a safety system that you want to remain silent, not operating in the early phase of fire.

00:27:42.842 --> 00:27:44.428
What does happen with the smoke then?

00:27:44.428 --> 00:27:50.151
Well, it forms a buoyant layer underneath the ceiling of your car park and it spreads around.

00:27:50.151 --> 00:27:51.693
Is it bad?

00:27:51.693 --> 00:27:53.567
Depends on the height of the car park.

00:27:53.567 --> 00:28:02.414
If your car park is high enough, you have enough volume in your smoke reservoir in that car park for the smoke to spread for even minutes.

00:28:02.414 --> 00:28:17.074
The biggest car park we've ever done had like 10,000 square meters compartment and we were releasing smoke for like seven, eight minutes into that car park and you could see a hundred meters away the buoyant layer of the smoke.

00:28:17.074 --> 00:28:21.082
So it's real, it's not imaginary.

00:28:21.082 --> 00:28:21.883
The buoyant layer.

00:28:21.883 --> 00:28:22.912
You see that in CFD.

00:28:22.912 --> 00:28:25.798
You see that in hot smoke tests it really works like that.

00:28:26.279 --> 00:28:31.179
It is possible to delay operation of jet fans and provide for this evacuation.

00:28:31.179 --> 00:28:33.711
Not in all cases this is the most optimal.

00:28:33.711 --> 00:28:40.403
There may be cases in which it's actually better to operate the jet fans early and risk exposing people to smoke.

00:28:40.403 --> 00:28:48.724
This is a difficult design decision and it has to be taken in accordance with your local country jurisdiction.

00:28:48.724 --> 00:28:53.862
Usually the country and the fire department will dictate to you whether you can delay them or not.

00:28:54.369 --> 00:28:58.080
Another controversy is whether they should operate before sprinklers, after sprinklers.

00:28:58.080 --> 00:29:00.436
That's really a challenge and a pain.

00:29:00.436 --> 00:29:07.821
Sometimes we have to delay the operation of jet fans based on the sprinkler operation to not interfere with the sprinklers.

00:29:07.821 --> 00:29:22.711
However, I've done a part of the research a few years ago where I was looking into how much jet fans disturb the sprinkler operation and unless you have sprinklers directly in the airstream of the jet fan, they were not influenced that much actually.

00:29:22.711 --> 00:29:30.679
So if you coordinate the designs very well, you don't put sprinklers in the literally axis of your jet fan operations.

00:29:30.679 --> 00:29:38.200
There should not be that much negative interference between the devices, so sprinklers should not affect the jet fans.

00:29:38.200 --> 00:29:39.750
Jet fans should not affect the sprinklers.

00:29:39.750 --> 00:29:41.313
Um, if you cannot delay them, jet fans should not affect the sprinklers.

00:29:41.333 --> 00:29:44.076
If you cannot delay them that much, what can you do?

00:29:44.076 --> 00:29:50.845
There are some intermediate solutions so, for example, you can start your inlets and extraction shafts without starting the jet fans.

00:29:50.845 --> 00:29:58.617
This should give a very gentle push to the air in the car park.

00:29:58.617 --> 00:30:00.589
So you will start moving the air a little bit, perhaps not with the full velocity that you want.

00:30:00.589 --> 00:30:05.021
But also, we dimensioned the system for a full-size vehicle fire.

00:30:05.021 --> 00:30:07.940
We've discussed them with Zahir a few weeks ago.

00:30:07.940 --> 00:30:09.836
That would be multiple megawatts.

00:30:09.836 --> 00:30:12.598
In the early phase you will have just hundreds of kilowatts of the fire.

00:30:12.598 --> 00:30:17.201
So perhaps you don't need that much air to obtain the effects that you're looking for.

00:30:17.201 --> 00:30:25.358
Therefore, enabling the extraction and inlets for a very low velocity may be very beneficial.

00:30:25.358 --> 00:30:48.712
Another thing that you can do and we all sometimes observe this in car parks when you start the Jetfire systems, you immediately lose the visibility, like in split second in the entire car park, and to lessen that effect, you can start them sequentially, like from the furthest to the closest, and just add some delay between the time you operate the the next group of jet fans and for your inlets and extraction funds.

00:30:48.712 --> 00:31:07.280
You can put a long ramp up functions on your control panels so you can say the fan should start from zero to maximum capacity gently for like two minutes, and this usually really softens the blow and prolongs this evacuation time, improves the conditions.

00:31:07.280 --> 00:31:16.113
It's a very good operational strategy for the jet fans and of course there will be I've said that before with the square car parks.

00:31:16.153 --> 00:31:22.773
There are some challenging configurations of buildings in which designing the car park is with jet fan system is really hard.

00:31:22.773 --> 00:31:26.801
The easiest is when the car park reassembles a tunnel.

00:31:26.801 --> 00:31:29.994
If it's narrow, if it's long, it's perfect for jet fans.

00:31:29.994 --> 00:31:37.457
The more complicated the geometry is, then you probably will have a harder time designing jet fan systems.

00:31:37.457 --> 00:31:41.336
If you have like a labyrinth of compartments, it's going to be very, very difficult or almost impossible to time designing jet fan systems.

00:31:41.336 --> 00:31:45.078
If you have a labyrinth of compartments, it's going to be very, very difficult or almost impossible to design a jet fan system.

00:31:45.078 --> 00:31:47.798
I like the simple rule of thumb.

00:31:47.798 --> 00:31:50.137
I've invented the Tetris rule.

00:31:50.137 --> 00:31:57.240
If you can define the shape of the car park with a Tetris block from the original game, you're pretty okay.

00:31:57.240 --> 00:32:02.855
If not, then it's going to be challenging, and I also use that for shopping malls.

00:32:02.855 --> 00:32:04.622
I think I mentioned it in the podcast.

00:32:04.622 --> 00:32:11.385
So, yeah, there will be challenging configurations in which providing a JetFan system will be very, very challenging.

00:32:11.385 --> 00:32:18.423
I've already spoken that you use CFD to design them and that's a big part of the JetFan system design.

00:32:19.069 --> 00:32:22.413
No two car parks are the same, even though they reassemble each other.

00:32:22.413 --> 00:32:26.221
Even though every car park is to store cars, they have similar highs.

00:32:26.221 --> 00:32:27.483
They would have similar areas.

00:32:27.483 --> 00:32:30.900
They look very similar, but they're not.

00:32:30.900 --> 00:32:42.477
From the perspective of designing JetFan system or ventilation system overall in car parks, every car park is different and it's those little things like location of your inlets that can make or break your system.

00:32:42.477 --> 00:32:49.678
That can be a tremendous difference between two systems in a building One that works, one that doesn't.

00:32:49.678 --> 00:32:51.080
You have to take it into account.

00:32:51.080 --> 00:32:57.140
So there are no easy pathways to design efficient jet fun systems On a piece of paper.

00:32:57.601 --> 00:33:03.637
You need to do some good engineering and for that you need some engineering tools, and the tool of choice is CFD modeling.

00:33:03.637 --> 00:33:16.123
I remember 10 years ago there was this little bit of drama in the industry because with some changes to a fire dynamic simulator, fds, it lost the ability to model jet fans.

00:33:16.123 --> 00:33:28.695
It did not simulate this momentum exchange between the stream of air to the surroundings and this created some really big issues in the industry because so many people were using fds to model jetfens systems.

00:33:28.695 --> 00:33:30.759
It was fixed like one or two years later.

00:33:30.759 --> 00:33:36.116
Today's today's fds is very capable of modeling jetfens systems.

00:33:36.116 --> 00:33:40.934
It's just a little difficult when you want to put them on angle because it's cartesian mesh, of course.

00:33:40.934 --> 00:33:43.820
But you can simulate JetFence with FDS.

00:33:43.820 --> 00:33:45.230
There are guidelines on how to do it.

00:33:45.230 --> 00:33:48.317
On Thunderhead Engineering we are using ANSYS.

00:33:48.317 --> 00:33:57.163
For ANSYS there are a lot of ways you can simulate JetFence and my good friend Gosia Krul has written a paper on the ways to model JetFence.

00:33:57.163 --> 00:34:02.031
I'll link that in the show notes.

00:34:02.031 --> 00:34:07.672
So if you are not an FDS user but you use Ansys, fluent or perhaps OpenFOAM, you can find some inspiration in there on how to model them correctly.

00:34:08.253 --> 00:34:13.304
And in general, I find CFD a brilliant tool of choice to really let me study Jetfens.

00:34:13.304 --> 00:34:22.391
I've done CFDs for I don't know 200 car parks, maybe even more, and every time I do a car park I find something new and interesting in them.

00:34:22.391 --> 00:34:29.715
So yeah, it's a tool that is absolutely necessary to do and another tool that I find quite necessary are hot smoke tests.

00:34:29.715 --> 00:34:39.835
So I really find huge value in performing hot smoke tests in JetFan systems in car parks because this allows you to visualize the flow of air in your car park.

00:34:39.835 --> 00:34:49.597
After the car park is built, the system is fitted in your building and you can really look into where that air goes through, does it follow your strategy?

00:34:49.597 --> 00:34:59.099
And because we're working on low-velocity systems and fairly low fire powers, the hot smoke test is quite a good representation of a real fire in the car park.

00:34:59.099 --> 00:35:06.161
There is not that huge difference in buoyancy between a growing vehicle fire and a hot smoke test really.

00:35:06.161 --> 00:35:19.614
So it really is the most brilliant tool you can use, and we recommend running hot smoke tests in every single car park that we design, because this just allows you to fiddle with the system on site and perhaps change the things that you've missed in your CFD.

00:35:19.614 --> 00:35:27.141
The real building and the model those are two different things, and sometimes in the real building you will find things that you have not expected with CFD.

00:35:27.141 --> 00:35:28.612
Can you fix them?

00:35:28.612 --> 00:35:33.452
Yes, from our experience, you can do a lot of fiddling with the JetFan system on the side.

00:35:33.452 --> 00:35:35.114
You can turn JetFans on off.

00:35:35.114 --> 00:35:39.099
You can change the capacities of your inlets, outlets, lower them.

00:35:39.099 --> 00:35:42.364
Sometimes you can combine some smoke compartments together.

00:35:42.364 --> 00:35:45.619
You can choose a different set of jet vents.

00:35:45.619 --> 00:35:47.838
You can revert their operation if they're reversible.

00:35:47.838 --> 00:36:03.896
There's a lot of ways you can fiddle with jet vent system on site at hot smoke tests and this really is like this fine tuning moment of the system where you get the most of its performance, fine-tuning moment of the system where you get the most of its performance.

00:36:03.896 --> 00:36:05.824
And finally, as we finish the episode, some remarks on the design properties.

00:36:05.844 --> 00:36:11.277
So when I would be approaching a project with JetFan system, a factor would be the height of the car park.

00:36:11.277 --> 00:36:15.559
So if it's less than 2.7 meters I would not even do the JetFan system at all.

00:36:15.559 --> 00:36:19.612
I just find it almost impossible to provide any evacuation and tentability into the car parks With JetFan system.

00:36:19.612 --> 00:36:21.494
With normal systems I just find it almost impossible to provide any evacuation and tentability into the car parks With jet fin system.

00:36:21.494 --> 00:36:24.246
With normal systems I just don't do car parks that low.

00:36:24.246 --> 00:36:28.077
For me they're dangerous If they're tall enough, like three meters and higher.

00:36:28.077 --> 00:36:31.956
I'm very comfortable with the jet fin systems and for most of the car parks we would go with one.

00:36:32.438 --> 00:36:39.481
The second thing is the width and the shape of the car park, so I need to look into how big and wide it is.

00:36:39.481 --> 00:36:44.257
The more narrowed and more reassembling the tunnel, the easier it is to design the jet fan system.

00:36:44.257 --> 00:36:52.081
For more complex car parks, you would need multiple inlet extraction points so you can drive the air a little better.

00:36:52.081 --> 00:36:55.777
I would look into where are the narrow passages in my car park.

00:36:55.777 --> 00:37:02.577
When the air will accelerate, I would look into potential locations for smoke curtains if I want to limit the spread in some direction.

00:37:02.577 --> 00:37:06.851
I would look into where the extractions are on the roofs.

00:37:06.851 --> 00:37:08.378
That's an important thing.

00:37:08.378 --> 00:37:14.724
I don't want the extraction to be too close to my inlet point on the roof, for example, so it's also something that we take into account.

00:37:15.346 --> 00:37:18.313
Another thing that most people would worry with is the design fire.

00:37:18.313 --> 00:37:19.815
For us, it's not a worry.

00:37:19.815 --> 00:37:28.742
In our book in 2015, we've used the TNO design curves and we stay with that, and that's something that we normally ordinarily use.

00:37:28.742 --> 00:37:40.443
A big discussion on design fires for car parks has been done with Zahir in some episodes ago, so please look into that if you're looking for inspiration for your design fire.

00:37:41.309 --> 00:37:44.300
And while designing, I would start with some capacity.

00:37:44.300 --> 00:37:54.103
I usually design the systems for smoke controls, I would look if I am able to provide this smoke-free access to the fire brigade with starting capacity.

00:37:54.103 --> 00:38:04.115
My usual starting capacity would be 180,000 cubic meters per hour for the smaller car parks, 300,000 cubic meters per hour for larger car parks.

00:38:04.115 --> 00:38:06.782
That's what I would start with and I look at the outcomes.

00:38:06.782 --> 00:38:10.342
If they're good, I could possibly optimize that further.

00:38:10.342 --> 00:38:22.641
If it looks to them lacking some more, I would increase that by, let's say, 30,000 cubic meters per hour until I reach my capacity that I am comfortable with and something that the designers can actually fit into the building.

00:38:22.641 --> 00:38:24.275
That is another thing.

00:38:24.275 --> 00:38:30.960
So those would be the factors that I would go through when designing a JetFan system for a car park from the scratch.

00:38:31.590 --> 00:38:41.336
So to summarize, jetfan systems could be a very efficient way to provide smoke control in your car parks fairly cheap way, easy, easy.

00:38:41.336 --> 00:38:44.478
Like I like simplicity, and the jet fan system is a very simple system.

00:38:44.478 --> 00:38:47.251
You blow air in one direction and you expect the smoke to follow.

00:38:47.251 --> 00:38:49.818
You extract it at the end of the pathway.

00:38:49.818 --> 00:38:50.942
You are good.

00:38:50.942 --> 00:38:56.878
For me, that's a very, very simple idea of operation with not that many points of possible failure.

00:38:56.878 --> 00:39:00.454
A lot of challenges underway, a lot of things to consider it.

00:39:00.454 --> 00:39:06.282
It's not an easy system by any means in terms of complications that you can see in the design process.

00:39:06.282 --> 00:39:18.577
But as you work with them, as you build your experience with them, you will gain more comfort designing those systems and you will start seeing and understanding more about them, more about them.

00:39:19.639 --> 00:39:23.903
If you need some design help, you can always ask us.

00:39:23.903 --> 00:39:26.827
We have tremendous experience with JetFan systems.

00:39:26.827 --> 00:39:34.619
I also have the book written about them in Polish that perhaps Google Translate can do a sufficiently good job in translating that.

00:39:34.619 --> 00:39:40.407
So if you want that, just point me an email and I'll try to organize something for you.

00:39:40.407 --> 00:39:41.273
Other than that, just point me an email and I'll try to organize something for you.

00:39:41.273 --> 00:39:55.123
Other than that, there is new European standard on jet fin systems in the EN 1211 family and that drives you towards high level smoke control systems meant for firefighting.

00:39:55.123 --> 00:39:57.860
I think it's a very good design principle.

00:39:58.190 --> 00:39:59.811
There are some guidelines coming from the UK.

00:39:59.811 --> 00:40:00.851
I think it's a very good design principle.

00:40:00.851 --> 00:40:02.873
There are some guidelines coming from the UK.

00:40:02.873 --> 00:40:08.119
There are guidelines coming from the Netherlands, belgium, so there's a lot of design choices you can have.

00:40:08.119 --> 00:40:15.565
There's a paper, a short paper by myself in the SFP Europe magazine, which tells you about the JetFan design.

00:40:15.565 --> 00:40:16.967
I'll link it in the show notes as well.

00:40:16.967 --> 00:40:29.746
So if you want a quick read to look into our research into the JetFan systems, you're very welcome to do so and you perhaps will find a lot of interesting information about the systems, operation in them.

00:40:29.766 --> 00:40:38.572
And that would be it for today's episode, a little shorter than usual, but I hope it still carried enough value to justify listening to this episode.

00:40:38.572 --> 00:40:43.963
I hope you've enjoyed it and I wonder what are your opinions about the JetFan systems?

00:40:43.963 --> 00:41:02.438
I remember an episode with Mike Woodrow and he was telling me the story of how an engineer designed a really good JetFan system in Russia, I believe and since then I thought, yeah, perhaps we should talk about JetFan systems in the car parks, because I really believe that they could be a good solution.

00:41:02.438 --> 00:41:04.856
That's it for today.

00:41:04.856 --> 00:41:15.137
Follow up Fire Science Show for more fire science and engineering, useful knowledge for you, fellow fire engineers, and I'm also open to learn from you.

00:41:15.137 --> 00:41:18.320
What would you like to hear about in Fire Science Show?

00:41:18.320 --> 00:41:20.719
What are the topics that we have missed so far?

00:41:20.719 --> 00:41:22.797
What should I introduce in here?

00:41:22.797 --> 00:41:23.934
Who should I invite?

00:41:23.934 --> 00:41:25.414
What should we talk about?

00:41:25.414 --> 00:41:30.679
I'm doing this podcast for you and I am very open to any feedback you can provide me.

00:41:30.679 --> 00:41:31.842
Thanks for today.

00:41:31.842 --> 00:41:33.135
See you here next Wednesday.

00:41:33.135 --> 00:42:00.666
Cheers Bye, thank you.