April 9, 2025

196 - Fire spread through external walls pt. 1 with FSRI

196 - Fire spread through external walls pt. 1 with FSRI
The player is loading ...
196 - Fire spread through external walls pt. 1 with FSRI

In this podcast episode, we host Rebekah Schrader, Joseph Willi, Daniel Gorham and Gavin Horn, all from the FSRI, to cover their recent experimental research on fire spread through external walls. This is part 1 of the interview - the background, rationale and context. In part 2, we cover the experiments themselves, findings and actionable guidance from the experiments.

This research is conducted within the context of structure-to-structure fire spread, potentially in urban conflagration scenarios. The subject is most relevant, as when wildfires meet urban areas, they transform into something far more destructive – "wildfire-initiated urban conflagrations." These events devastate entire communities as fire spreads rapidly from structure to structure, overwhelming firefighting resources and leaving widespread destruction in their wake.

The Fire Safety Research Institute has embarked on a comprehensive research initiative examining exactly how these conflagrations develop and spread. What started as a response to their advisory board's call to action in 2018 has evolved into a groundbreaking exploration of the complex interactions between wildland fires and the built environment.

We break down the three primary mechanisms of fire spread – radiant heat, direct flame contact, and firebrands – while highlighting specific vulnerabilities in modern construction, particularly windows and cladding systems.

What makes this research particularly valuable is how it bridges traditionally separate disciplines: wildfire science and structural fire engineering. The team explains how they've translated complex wildfire scenarios into controlled laboratory experiments that yield actionable data for improving building codes and community design.

Whether you're a fire safety professional, community planner, or homeowner in a wildfire-prone region, this conversation offers crucial insights into how we can create more resilient communities in the face of this growing threat.

In the next episode, we will cover in depth the details of three experiments mentioned today.

Find the research papers at:

  • https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.3278
  • https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-024-01685-8
  • https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-024-01656-z

And additional resources at:

  • https://fsri.org/research-update/journal-article-reports-heat-transfer-through-different-window-constructions
  • https://fsri.org/research-update/journal-article-investigates-role-residential-siding-materials-spread-exterior

----
The Fire Science Show is produced by the Fire Science Media in collaboration with OFR Consultants. Thank you to the podcast sponsor for their continuous support towards our mission.

00:00 - Introduction to External Walls Research

06:13 - Understanding WUI and Urban Conflagration

11:42 - FSRI's Research Methodology

18:35 - Fire Spread Mechanisms Between Buildings

27:12 - Window Vulnerabilities and Technology

36:08 - Structure Hardening Against Wildfires

43:38 - Engineering Fire-Safe Communities

WEBVTT

00:00:01.161 --> 00:00:02.867
Hello everybody, welcome to the Fire Science Show.

00:00:02.867 --> 00:00:34.787
My mission in this podcast is to curate a listening list for you covering the most important interesting research happening around the world, and my attention came to a very interesting and big piece of research recently that is constantly published by Fire Safety Research Institute, fsri, and their research orbits around the topic of external walls and fire spread between buildings, fire spread through external walls and different aspects of that fire spread.

00:00:34.787 --> 00:00:41.000
And when I've looked into the papers, it was immediate to me that this is a fantastic piece of research.

00:00:41.000 --> 00:00:50.482
It's a piece that covers a very important knowledge gap that we have in fire safety and, what's even more interesting, it does not just cover the fire spread on its own.

00:00:50.482 --> 00:01:01.692
It puts it in the context of wildland, urban interface, fires entering urban habitats and fire spread like the ones that we've seen, perhaps, in LA Palisades fire recently.

00:01:01.692 --> 00:01:09.408
You know the urban configuration, types of fires that are really the most threatening ones, the ones that we really worry about the most.

00:01:09.408 --> 00:01:35.069
So, beyond just studying fire physics, beyond just studying compartment fires, beyond studying fire spread, this research literally bridges two disciplines wildfires and compartment fire science, and that makes it really, really interesting, and therefore I've started digging, started connecting myself with the colleagues at FSRI and organized this interview, and boy, this project is much bigger than I thought.

00:01:35.069 --> 00:01:38.626
So what you're about to witness is a two-part episode.

00:01:38.626 --> 00:01:55.090
Actually, in this first episode published today, we are covering the background, the rationale, the why, why are they pursuing this massive research set, what questions do they try to answer and what's the scientific context of the considerations.

00:01:55.090 --> 00:02:13.068
And in the episode that will be published in the next week, we will go more in-depth into the experiments performed, the experimental setups, results of those experiments, how they interplay together, what we've learned new from those experiments and how fire engineers can use that.

00:02:13.068 --> 00:02:17.688
My guess first time, I'm doing an interview with four different guests at the same time.

00:02:17.688 --> 00:02:31.225
So those are Rebecca Schroeder, joseph Willey, dan Gorham and Gavin Horn, all from FSRI, all involved in this magnificent external wall research project.

00:02:31.225 --> 00:02:34.513
So what else to add, you'll figure out yourself.

00:02:34.513 --> 00:02:37.609
Let's spin the intro and jump into the episode.

00:02:43.420 --> 00:02:44.967
Welcome to the Firesize Show.

00:02:44.967 --> 00:02:48.469
My name is Wojciech Wigrzyński and I will be your host.

00:02:48.469 --> 00:03:17.743
This podcast is brought to you in collaboration with OFR Consultants, a multi-award-winning independent consultancy dedicated to addressing fire safety challenges, established in the UK in 2016 as a startup business of two highly experienced fire engineering consultants.

00:03:17.743 --> 00:03:23.250
The business has grown phenomenally to eight offices across the country, from Edinburgh to Bath.

00:03:23.250 --> 00:03:32.810
Colleagues are on a mission to continually explore the challenges that FHIR creates for clients and society, applying the best research experience and diligence for effective, tailored solution.

00:03:32.810 --> 00:03:37.004
In 2025, there will be new opportunities to work with OFR.

00:03:37.004 --> 00:03:44.609
Ofr will grow its team once more and is keen to hear from industry professionals who would like to collaborate on fire safety features this year.

00:03:44.609 --> 00:03:53.145
Get in touch at OFRconsultantscom.

00:03:53.164 --> 00:03:55.552
Hello everybody, I am here joined today by quite a crowd from the Fire Safety Research Institute.

00:03:55.552 --> 00:03:58.502
Hello guys, I'll start with Rebecca Schroeder from FSRI.

00:03:58.502 --> 00:03:59.787
Hello, rebecca, nice to meet you.

00:03:59.787 --> 00:04:02.263
Hi, nice to meet you On my screen.

00:04:02.263 --> 00:04:03.807
Next is Joseph Willey hey, joseph, how's it going?

00:04:03.807 --> 00:04:04.449
Dan Gorham hey Dan, okay.

00:04:04.449 --> 00:04:05.814
Yeah, nice to meet you On my screen.

00:04:05.814 --> 00:04:06.997
Next is Joseph Willey hey, joseph, how's it going?

00:04:06.997 --> 00:04:08.241
Dan Gorham hey Dan, okay.

00:04:08.241 --> 00:04:08.902
Yeah, good to see you.

00:04:08.902 --> 00:04:11.027
And Gavin Horn Welcome back, sir.

00:04:11.590 --> 00:04:12.412
Thank you, great to be here.

00:04:12.900 --> 00:04:18.048
Oh, and really amazed that we've pulled this over, and I'm really happy to record this podcast episode.

00:04:18.048 --> 00:04:44.225
So, to go straight into the important stuff, you guys are inside of a very interesting project related to external walls, heat exposures, fire spread into the buildings from the buildings, all rotating, revolving around external walls of our buildings in in the most interesting context, combining a wild and urban interface with built environment civil engineering.

00:04:44.225 --> 00:04:45.348
I love it, love it.

00:04:45.348 --> 00:04:47.653
I love the way how you are applying this.

00:04:47.653 --> 00:05:02.494
So, before we start talking nitty gritty about your experiments and the setups that you've done, tell me what made you start this work, because I assume it was not just a random coincidence that you run into this massive undertaking.

00:05:02.494 --> 00:05:10.045
So what was the initial trigger to go into this research, joey, would you like to start?

00:05:10.600 --> 00:05:25.428
So at FSRI we have an advisory board that we kind of consult with, filled with fire experts from all different types of fields whether that's the fire service or fire protection engineers or fire researchers and they kind of help guide our research.

00:05:25.600 --> 00:05:37.552
And so we have an annual meeting where we tell them, get them up to speed on the kind of research we've been doing over the past year, and then we have a session where we ask what do you think our next topic should be?

00:05:37.552 --> 00:05:40.850
What are some spaces we're not exploring that we should explore?

00:05:40.850 --> 00:05:44.490
And so we had one of those meetings, and was it 2018,?

00:05:44.490 --> 00:05:46.961
I think that we should explore.

00:05:46.961 --> 00:05:49.170
And so we had one of those meetings, and was it 2018?

00:05:49.170 --> 00:05:49.391
I think.

00:05:49.391 --> 00:05:51.879
And by far the number one issue that we hadn't been addressing was wildland or WUI fires, and that makes sense.

00:05:51.879 --> 00:05:58.504
It's been a hot topic, especially over the last couple of decades, as these fires increase in frequency, severity and size.

00:05:58.504 --> 00:06:08.767
So, based upon that, we started planning out what our research would look like, what we would focus on, and our first goal was to kind of look at structures.

00:06:08.767 --> 00:06:11.033
We've always focused on structure fires.

00:06:11.033 --> 00:06:16.249
Fsri started with the fire service and looking at fires inside of structures.

00:06:16.249 --> 00:06:22.990
So our idea was we would be looking at fires outside of structures kind of exterior fire spread into the structures.

00:06:22.990 --> 00:06:34.831
And so a part of researching that, our first round of experiments we conducted in a large-scale fire lab in Northbrook and we had three different phases of experiments.

00:06:34.920 --> 00:06:47.826
Our first phase was looking at different types of building material, construction materials, samples, when they're exposed to a well-characterized heat source in the form of the heptane spray burner and kind of how they would react.

00:06:47.826 --> 00:06:54.574
So we set them at distances that gave us approximate heat fluxes of 10, 20, and 30 kilowatts per meter squared.

00:06:54.574 --> 00:07:03.302
And we were looking at materials from roofing materials, siding materials, decking materials and then small window samples with glass panes in them.

00:07:03.302 --> 00:07:07.351
So we looked at how they reacted at those different levels of exposures.

00:07:07.351 --> 00:07:13.913
And then we also wanted to kind of characterize what the heat flux exposure from a compartment fire would be.

00:07:13.913 --> 00:07:28.047
So the second phase was looking at a compartment fire that had an attached facade to it with different siding materials to see if the different siding materials would contribute to that overall exposure from a compartment fires.

00:07:28.047 --> 00:07:51.552
And then our third kind of experimental phase was okay, we have the compartment fire that we characterized in the second phase what happens if we put a target facade across from it at a separation distance that you would see in a community with a high population density, and how would that target facade react to this compartment fire exposure?

00:07:51.680 --> 00:07:55.800
So we were looking at different types of siding materials on the target facade.

00:07:55.800 --> 00:08:00.591
We had two double-hung, double-paned windows mounted in the target facade.

00:08:00.591 --> 00:08:13.189
But then a third thing we were looking at is the fire spread between them and what type of potential fuels could you have in between two structures that would kind of initiate fire spread from the compartment to the target facade?

00:08:13.189 --> 00:08:18.327
So we ran three experiments with three different types of what we referred to as ladder fuels.

00:08:18.327 --> 00:08:22.822
We looked at the impact of a car in between two structures.

00:08:22.822 --> 00:08:31.747
We looked at the impact of an attached deck attached to the target facade, and then we also examined a shed small shed in between the two structures.

00:08:31.747 --> 00:08:47.567
And so, based upon these three sets of experiments, we decided that we would plan our next experiments to be a bit more focused and look at the impact of different siding materials or exterior wall assemblies, as well as look more into window failure.

00:08:48.179 --> 00:08:50.168
So you said it started like 2018.

00:08:50.168 --> 00:08:56.513
What did the environment, like scientific environment, in this regard look like?

00:08:56.513 --> 00:08:57.553
Was it like a blank spot?

00:08:57.553 --> 00:09:02.652
Where did you find the biggest gaps in knowledge in solving those problems?

00:09:02.652 --> 00:09:08.650
Because I think 2018, I would say that was already the wildfire.

00:09:08.650 --> 00:09:11.466
Research was already pretty intense.

00:09:12.279 --> 00:09:24.566
I think one of the things that makes the WUI fire, or community conflagration fire, that a challenge is because of the complexity, the spatial scale is because of the complexity, the spatial scale.

00:09:24.566 --> 00:09:40.115
If we talk about a high-rise building that's 20, 50, 100 stories tall, you can think about them as individual structures, but you have that primarily vertical component, whereas at the community scale we have this horizontal component.

00:09:40.115 --> 00:09:55.039
In addition to the vertical component we have multi-story residential structures or commercial structures component, have multi-story residential structures or commercial structures, and so it really is that complexity of oftentimes it's not a single fire scenario, it's oftentimes multiple fire scenarios.

00:09:55.039 --> 00:10:11.229
So that might be your immediately adjacent structure that has burned from a kitchen fire or some other typical fire problem, but in a community conflagration event, where the fire transitioned from the wildland into the built environment, oftentimes it's multiple structures.

00:10:11.229 --> 00:10:19.311
So it's your neighbor next to you and across the street and three houses down, and so now we have multiple thermal exposures for multiple vectors.

00:10:19.311 --> 00:10:22.730
There's also the complexity of fuel continuity.

00:10:22.730 --> 00:10:30.576
Joe was talking about that in some of those initial experiments looking at the intermediate or ladder fuels between structures.

00:10:30.636 --> 00:10:38.743
If we think of structures and buildings as the primary things in the built environment, that being damaged or destroyed is the biggest loss.

00:10:38.743 --> 00:10:42.072
There are all the things in between and the residential communities.

00:10:42.072 --> 00:10:51.022
That can be cars, that can be ornamental vegetation, that can be your kid's play set.

00:10:51.022 --> 00:10:54.774
So there are a lot of these complexities that differentiate this WUI or G&E conflagration problem from other fire safety problems.

00:10:54.774 --> 00:10:55.576
But that is.

00:10:55.957 --> 00:11:04.144
It has also created an opportunity to learn from and lean on the experience and the knowledge base that we have in that space to translate it over.

00:11:04.144 --> 00:11:12.870
But we have to add compounding factors like that sprawl, that spatial component, the ambient factors like temperature, relative humidity and wind.

00:11:12.870 --> 00:11:18.572
And then another important component of FSRI's research is fire service intervention.

00:11:18.572 --> 00:11:27.139
When we think about structure fires or fires within the compartment, we oftentimes think about ventilation limited and water suppression.

00:11:27.139 --> 00:11:31.511
But in these configuration events, water supply is oftentimes limited.

00:11:31.511 --> 00:11:46.450
There's oftentimes more fires than there are resources, whether that be engines or responders, and so this is why the fire safety problem is big and something that FSRI is compelled to address safety problem is big and something that FSRI is compelled to address.

00:11:46.470 --> 00:11:50.875
FSRI is known for giving good fire safety considerations to the firefighters.

00:11:50.875 --> 00:11:59.086
A follow-up question, going from a general weave problem or even urban conflagration problem into actionable research items.

00:11:59.086 --> 00:12:01.552
It's not something you just simply sit down and research.

00:12:01.552 --> 00:12:03.142
It's too big, so you had to narrow down.

00:12:03.142 --> 00:12:19.389
So how did you come up with this research program in which this, I understand, there was a preliminary research, but how does it tie Like why, in particular, this fire spread through the external walls, why this was the gap that you've tried to fill out.

00:12:19.980 --> 00:12:30.841
So, as far as windows go, there've been post-Wooey fire investigation that have identified windows window failure as a potential point of fire spread to structures.

00:12:30.841 --> 00:12:38.863
Once a window fails, there's now an opening for hot gases, fire and embers to get through and ignite interior contents.

00:12:38.863 --> 00:12:43.679
However, there has been some research in the past that looks at window failure.

00:12:43.679 --> 00:12:49.158
Some of that is more than 20 years old and windows have developed since then then.

00:12:49.158 --> 00:12:53.576
But also there's not a whole lot of research out there that's more on the full scale side.

00:12:53.576 --> 00:12:59.020
So that's one gap that we were trying to fill with this research so with the modern technology I also.

00:12:59.763 --> 00:13:08.711
I think window technology and in general, facade technology is perhaps one of the biggest innovative areas of civil engineering and construction.

00:13:08.711 --> 00:13:13.179
Is it also the case for uh, private housing and dwellings and smaller?

00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:14.823
developments I would say so.

00:13:14.823 --> 00:13:23.659
I mean, you know energy efficiency has become a large thing over the last few decades, so with that you have kind of ever-changing window technology.

00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:25.594
Yeah, and the other aspects.

00:13:25.594 --> 00:13:26.517
You started listing them.

00:13:26.517 --> 00:13:27.359
I interrupted you.

00:13:27.440 --> 00:13:28.932
Yeah, yeah, no, I was just going to mention that.

00:13:28.932 --> 00:13:34.447
The other thing, specifically with reference to codes and standards that are used in the united states.

00:13:34.447 --> 00:13:36.533
So there's kind of three primary documents.

00:13:36.533 --> 00:13:43.432
There's nfpa 1140, chapter 7a of the california building code, and iwc.

00:13:43.432 --> 00:13:49.565
That are wii based codes and within them they address windows, but in a limited fashion.

00:13:49.565 --> 00:13:58.423
They're typically focused on the glazing or paint assembly and they make no mention of other window components such as frames.

00:13:58.423 --> 00:14:04.419
And then when it comes to the, the glazing or the glass, they have some variation between them.

00:14:04.419 --> 00:14:12.643
So for iwec and nfp 1140 they require either a tempered pain assembly or a multi-pain assembly.

00:14:12.643 --> 00:14:20.539
But with the multi-pain assembly they don't specify what type of glass should be used, so you can have a double pain, just plain glass assembly.

00:14:21.162 --> 00:14:44.591
And then with chapter 7a they require a multi-pain assembly with at least one pain tempered, but they don't specify which of the two or more pains should be the tempered pain did the preliminary research also guide you towards which, which are the most, I don't know, often found to be failure in wii scenarios, or was something that you only unraveled during your experiments?

00:14:45.192 --> 00:14:45.854
yeah, we saw.

00:14:45.854 --> 00:14:46.434
So we weren't.

00:14:46.434 --> 00:14:52.085
We were only looking at double-pane plain glass assemblies during those initial experiments.

00:14:52.085 --> 00:14:57.962
But with the phase three, with the target facade we had, like I mentioned, we had two windows.

00:14:57.962 --> 00:15:08.436
One of those windows had a low E coding on it and so we kind of based on our analysis of the data, saw interesting things with the window failure itself.

00:15:08.436 --> 00:15:21.807
We saw frames start to deform and whatnot, but also different types of failure with the panes, and saw maybe an indication that a low recoding could have may or may not have an impact on glass failure.

00:15:22.350 --> 00:15:43.099
If I understand correctly also this whole research, it was not just that the structure is a target of wild and urban interface fire, so you just understand how the structure responds to the fire, but you were also looking into a structure being a source of exposure to neighboring structures, also those interactions from in between.

00:15:43.099 --> 00:15:54.075
So it also kind of progresses to the influence of those external walls and how we build them as a factor that could contribute to an urban configuration scenario.

00:15:54.075 --> 00:16:10.009
I I would say like, if you ask me, uh, if you asked me, like last year, uh, about urban configuration, I would say, there, they, they don't seem to happen recently, but after what I saw in la uh just a few months ago, I'm not so sure if the age of urban configurations is gone.

00:16:10.009 --> 00:16:12.177
So, and you've started this in 2018.

00:16:12.177 --> 00:16:13.655
How did it look back then?

00:16:13.655 --> 00:16:15.153
Was it a part of your interest?

00:16:15.895 --> 00:16:16.899
Absolutely so.

00:16:16.899 --> 00:16:23.274
The best way I've heard these events described are as wildfire-initiated urban conflagrations.

00:16:23.274 --> 00:16:38.081
So it may start out as wildfire, but once it enters areas that are more populated, with a higher structure density, then all of a sudden there's a new fuel load introduced in the form of structures and the fire kind of spreads structure to structure throughout these communities.

00:16:38.081 --> 00:16:50.340
And that's where you see a lot of times the large amount of loss and devastation that's associated with those events is due to that time when the fire enters these kinds of communities.

00:16:51.520 --> 00:16:58.086
Is there also any specific context in how the structures are built, the distances between the structures?

00:16:59.830 --> 00:17:01.173
Was it also something that you've looked into?

00:17:01.173 --> 00:17:15.616
So we based our structure separation distances on kind of the worst-case scenario, or the highest population density areas or not the highest, but on the higher end and what kind of structure separation you'd see between there.

00:17:15.616 --> 00:17:22.324
So particularly we looked at anywhere from 1.8 meters to 4.3 meters separation distance.

00:17:22.904 --> 00:17:31.592
And in case, if there was a lot of fuel in between, did you also put the fuels between the structures and investigate that, or that was just preliminary, preliminary yeah, just during the preliminary.

00:17:31.711 --> 00:17:31.972
Okay.

00:17:31.972 --> 00:17:36.685
Now of course, in hindsight uh, looking at that, la fires was put up.

00:17:36.685 --> 00:17:42.520
It's obvious that this structure to structure fire spread was something you could expect in hindsight.

00:17:42.520 --> 00:17:45.238
Events like that did you observe?

00:17:45.238 --> 00:17:48.810
You must have went through the literature and and the previous fires.

00:17:48.810 --> 00:17:58.585
Have you observed events like that and how big part of your research plan was investigating fire behavior like we'd later observed in the lake?

00:17:58.924 --> 00:18:14.449
Yeah, and you know, when you look at the history of fire, particularly in the North American United States but across the world, I mean events like the Peshtigo Fire the same night of the Great Chicago Fire, I mean so many of those urban fires from the 1800s to the modern day.

00:18:14.589 --> 00:18:35.163
I mean over the past decade, the state of California alone has had some of their top 10, most destructive by structure loss count the Tubbs Fire, the Camp Fire, other parts of the country, the Marshall Fire and then just a couple of years ago now in Maui, hawaii, they had a series of fires.

00:18:35.163 --> 00:18:50.395
These were initiated as wildfires but in the case of the town of Wahaina, that brush fire or wildfire transitioned into the built environment, very similar to what we observed in the Marshall Fire in Colorado and many others around the world.

00:18:50.395 --> 00:19:20.080
And it's this transition from a wildfire or vegetation fire or a brush fire which has its ecological purposes, but as it enters into the built environment, it's that again, that fire safety or that fire phenomenon transition from a fuel that maybe needs burning, whether it be the vegetation or the shrubs, to the built environment where we have our homes and our communities that we don't want to burn, and that's the fire problem that transition from the wildfire into the built environment.

00:19:20.810 --> 00:19:29.115
Yeah, and to bring this introduction full circle, this is how FSRI became engaged in the Wildland Interface research.

00:19:29.656 --> 00:20:08.819
Our colleague, derek Alconis at the time was the chief of the Air and Wildland Division at LA County Fire Department and was on our advisory board and he'd been responding to these fires that Dan just mentioned and including the Woolsey Fire and others that were there in Los Angeles County and year after year they were seeing these events that were occurring and were looking for answers on how they can better prepare their firefighters, prepare the citizens and be ready to respond to these fires but also make sure that the citizens themselves are as informed as possible and codes could be updated as well as possible.

00:20:09.630 --> 00:20:28.305
And because FSRI sits at a unique area where we were born from the firefighters St Jude Research Institute right, the firefighters have long been our core citizens, our incredibly important core audience for us, where we can take this full-scale research and address those concerns that exist.

00:20:28.305 --> 00:21:01.040
So after we saw a series of those fires in California, we began this program and identified, as Joe had just mentioned, windows as being one of the key vulnerabilities that there's some research that we can do at a scale that can help to fill in this gap and hopefully reduce some of those challenges that the fire department's facing, so citizens can have their structures prepared as best as they possibly can, and the firefighters can then respond as efficiently and as effectively as possible.

00:21:01.040 --> 00:21:06.982
So that's really how we really got to the area that we're at right now from a research perspective.

00:21:07.470 --> 00:21:11.801
Yeah, I'm pushing and chipping you to tell me the story, how you came into that.

00:21:11.801 --> 00:21:18.722
Because, like you guys are FSRI, you are the people who burn things down and do that in lab.

00:21:18.722 --> 00:21:21.478
That's like a normal Friday for you to burn down the house.

00:21:21.478 --> 00:21:24.267
I'm a fire researcher as well.

00:21:24.267 --> 00:21:27.272
I'm doing my time in the lab.

00:21:27.272 --> 00:21:40.803
Heat flux on my skin is not something I'm very unused to and, uh, in some odd way, you know, doing this research and doing all of those endeavors is our normal everyday's life.

00:21:40.923 --> 00:21:55.579
But there are hundreds of people out there fire safety engineers, civil engineers, architects who now have this problem of whole communities burning down, who wonder how do we solve the problem?

00:21:55.579 --> 00:22:03.359
And I would love people to understand how we, as scientists, how we figure out a high-level problem.

00:22:03.359 --> 00:22:09.603
In your case that's wildland-urban interface, initiated urban conflagrations.

00:22:09.603 --> 00:22:11.550
I love it because it nails down the problem.

00:22:11.550 --> 00:22:45.903
But here's it's a high level objective and by investigating, going through the history, going through the previous research, investigating evolution of the market, solutions, technologies, the ways how people build houses, looking into firefighters, reapers, you start narrowing down that big high-level problem into something that could be a window pane or a gasket or a facade technology and then in your laboratory, you can very precisely tell what makes the difference in this problem.

00:22:45.903 --> 00:22:56.642
That's the way of thinking that I want our audience to really understand, because if you understand the research process, one, you understand the research better.

00:22:56.642 --> 00:23:04.384
But two, if you have good ideas, you can send them to people like FSRI or me and we'll perhaps follow on that.

00:23:04.529 --> 00:23:11.280
But anyways, sorry for getting sidetracked, I just really had to say that and also admire your work a lot.

00:23:11.280 --> 00:23:17.019
Anyway, we know why, but one thing we still need to clean out.

00:23:17.019 --> 00:23:21.280
It was previously said that those fires spread through firebrands.

00:23:21.280 --> 00:23:26.849
We also mentioned heat fluxes, we mentioned ladder fuels, so fires in between the buildings.

00:23:26.849 --> 00:23:31.579
So perhaps let's clean out how the fires can enter the building and how fires can exit the building.

00:23:31.579 --> 00:23:33.384
I don't know, dan, maybe you can start.

00:23:33.849 --> 00:23:50.218
Yeah, so thinking about exterior fire or fire outside of the box, outside of the enclosure, and oftentimes we think about the box, the enclosure, the house, the building, the structure as the property or as the asset that's most important.

00:23:50.218 --> 00:24:00.584
And again, a lot of times when we think at these historical fires, what comes to the top is the acres burned, the unfortunate number of fatalities and structures damaged and destroyed.

00:24:00.584 --> 00:24:09.750
And so how do structures get damaged, how does fire initiate from the exterior into the building and then, ultimately, how can that cause it to be destroyed?

00:24:09.750 --> 00:24:20.522
So when we think about that fire progression, you know there are lots of ways to kind of from first order fundamentals, but one framework to think about it is the building ignition mechanisms.

00:24:20.522 --> 00:24:27.602
We can think about that as radiant heat, and so this is that heat transfer that doesn't require any form of medium.

00:24:27.602 --> 00:24:44.500
So whether it be from a crown fire, you know large, 100 plus foot flames causing radiant heat transfer to a structure fire, similar magnitude flames, no direct contact, but enough heat transfer via just radiation to cause material to ignite.

00:24:45.240 --> 00:24:48.667
How really, like I don't fully understand.

00:24:48.667 --> 00:24:51.574
Well, I understand it but I don't fully feel it.

00:24:51.574 --> 00:25:02.935
So if you have a crown fire and let's say it's 100 meters away, which is approximately 300 feet in your units, how big the radiant heat flux could be from such a crown fire?

00:25:02.935 --> 00:25:04.682
Is it really high enough to ignite?

00:25:04.682 --> 00:25:10.213
Or how close the house has to be to the crown fire for radiant heat to be really like a direct hazard?

00:25:10.599 --> 00:25:14.065
Yeah, no, that's a good point that you know that radiant heat transfer.

00:25:14.065 --> 00:25:15.445
You know Jack Cohen's work.

00:25:15.445 --> 00:25:22.615
Looking at crown fire, you know we can see from the fundamentals that radiant heat transfer decreases with the distance right.

00:25:22.615 --> 00:25:27.311
So the amount of heat transfer required would be very, very high.

00:25:27.311 --> 00:25:31.703
You'd need so much radiant heat transfer required would be very, very high.

00:25:31.703 --> 00:25:32.827
You'd need so much radiant heat.

00:25:32.827 --> 00:25:50.726
But an important factor that radiant heat plays in this space is that while it may not be that tipping over the straw that broke the camel's back to cause ignition, it can be the prelude to cause materials to rise in temperature, to dehydrate, to maybe evaporate some of those components that would reduce the time to ignition.

00:25:50.726 --> 00:25:53.326
So that radiant heat may not be the tipping point.

00:25:53.326 --> 00:26:10.400
But I think in a lot of cases, and again in these conflagration events, radiant heat plays an important role in that fire spread, in that building ignition because of that back and also, if you have a structural fire next to your structure, then we're talking about completely different heat fluxes.

00:26:10.317 --> 00:26:11.482
And if you have a structural fire next to your structure, then we're talking about completely different heat fluxes.

00:26:11.482 --> 00:26:18.420
And if you have a ladder fuel in between and that ladder fuel burns, then again we're talking about completely different radiant heat flux.

00:26:18.420 --> 00:26:28.434
So again, this way of thinking about just a single house ignition versus, you know, a whole scenario in which, house by house by house, they start going off.

00:26:28.434 --> 00:26:32.887
I guess the mechanisms, the mechanisms, the prevailing mechanism can also shift.

00:26:32.887 --> 00:26:34.631
So radiant heat flux, that's one.

00:26:34.631 --> 00:26:35.772
What are others?

00:26:41.900 --> 00:26:42.362
Yeah, another mechanism.

00:26:42.362 --> 00:26:43.586
You just mentioned how these oftentimes are not in isolation.

00:26:43.586 --> 00:26:47.078
I think in almost every case, barring some exceptions, there's some combination of them.

00:26:47.078 --> 00:27:12.025
And the next that I would think about is that direct flame contact has that radiant heat component but also has that aromantency.

00:27:12.025 --> 00:27:14.111
So we think about the convective heat transfer.

00:27:14.111 --> 00:27:26.701
And so this is where we start to think about the fuel connectivity and the horizontal and vertical components, about how it's not just the structure separation but it's also the fuels in between.

00:27:26.740 --> 00:27:32.150
So let's put ourselves in a scenario, maybe a typical suburban or urban community.

00:27:32.150 --> 00:27:40.951
My home and your home are separated by, let's say, 30 feet, but between our homes I have a privacy fence that connects to the property line.

00:27:40.951 --> 00:27:47.143
On the side of my home I have some combustibles, like a garbage can and maybe my parked car, and you have the same.

00:27:47.143 --> 00:28:03.440
So now we have a scenario of the fire spreading perhaps from my structure to the fence, to the vehicle, and now it's not just the radiant heat from my structure and all those intermediary fuels, but now those fuels very close to your home can cause that direct and intermediate clean content.

00:28:03.941 --> 00:28:05.244
You said convective.

00:28:05.244 --> 00:28:07.371
How big a part of that is wind.

00:28:08.119 --> 00:28:10.917
Yeah, I think wind plays a really important role in these exterior fires and the convective how big part of that is wind?

00:28:10.917 --> 00:28:13.724
Yeah, I, I think wind plays a really important role in these exterior fires and the convective heat transfer.

00:28:13.724 --> 00:28:18.551
So if you think about, you know the, the gas temperatures it's superheated and if you're in that plume.

00:28:18.551 --> 00:28:22.044
But convective heat transfer can also play a role in cooling right.

00:28:22.044 --> 00:28:34.333
So we know about wind eddies and it's not always a straight line constant wind flow and oftentimes in these um, you know these urban communities, there's eddies and there's vortices and it's not constant.

00:28:34.333 --> 00:28:37.442
So convection plays both a heating and a cooling role.

00:28:37.442 --> 00:28:44.467
But I think when we talk about, you know that direct contact or, in the line of the plume, the convective heating.

00:28:44.467 --> 00:28:46.732
I think it's probably more dominant radiant.

00:28:46.732 --> 00:28:51.181
But convection is important enough that we shouldn't neglect it and firebrands.

00:28:51.240 --> 00:29:00.346
I think a lot of research I see recently is around firebrand ignition and how they can penetrate structures, so obviously that's a pathway right.

00:29:00.961 --> 00:29:14.900
Yeah, absolutely, firebrands, or embers or you know whatever you want to call them, these glowing or burning particles that are one generated by fuels, whether they be from the wildland or wildfire vegetation, as well as in the built environment.

00:29:15.181 --> 00:29:22.509
So once structures start to burn, once cars and RVs and kits placed that start to burn, they generate these particles.

00:29:23.080 --> 00:29:41.471
And one of the components of embers is they can travel beyond the kind of fire perimeter so they can travel distances reported of more than a mile, but even short range distances of tens of twenties of feet or, you know, tens of twenties of meters that can cause spot fires.

00:29:41.471 --> 00:29:45.160
Additionally, those firebrands can enter into the structure.

00:29:45.160 --> 00:29:55.602
So a lot right now we've been talking about kind of the, the building, the structure as a, as a, as an encapsulation, a force field if you will, and the flames and the radiant heat having to penetrate it.

00:29:55.602 --> 00:29:58.355
Well, these embers can penetrate into small little open.

00:29:58.355 --> 00:30:01.508
That might be through vents, into your attic, your crawl space.

00:30:01.508 --> 00:30:11.951
That might be through a window that hasn't failed from the heating mechanism but might have just been left open because people have their windows or some natural convection.

00:30:11.951 --> 00:30:26.807
So embers penetrating into the building or causing spot fires around the building can be that third, and oftentimes a large portion of building ignitions play a role in kind of three in combination of the mechanisms.

00:30:27.390 --> 00:30:37.912
So how does one turn a wildfire scenario or an external fire exposure scenario into laboratory-controlled exposure?

00:30:37.912 --> 00:30:44.200
Like, how do you go from wildfire into laboratory unless you're having a wildfire-sized laboratory?

00:30:44.200 --> 00:30:51.411
In that case it's perhaps easy, but how do you create this design exposure?

00:30:51.471 --> 00:30:55.911
let's say Well, really, whenever you're talking about fire exposure, there's a lot of different variables.

00:30:55.911 --> 00:31:02.593
With wildland fires especially, there's many including size of the fire, wind, etc.

00:31:02.593 --> 00:31:20.645
And so to kind of help control this, we came up with a scenario of a compartment fire that's venting out of an opening, the compartments flashed over, and that exposure from a fire venting out of an opening is not, it's going to be based on the opening size.

00:31:20.645 --> 00:31:48.226
If you have a compartment that's flashed over, just given ventilation to the fire, and we can replicate this exposure, and then, as far as what your targets are, we can have a matched target facade wall that's the same size as the wall attached to the compartment across from it, and so this kind of simulates fire spread from one structure out of event opening and how it could potentially spread to a adjacent structure.

00:31:48.807 --> 00:31:52.653
So this would be structure to outside or structure to structure.

00:31:53.320 --> 00:31:54.467
It's structure to structure.

00:31:54.467 --> 00:32:03.270
So we're imagining a scenario where there's already a structure that's involved with fire and a vent or large window opening.

00:32:03.270 --> 00:32:18.980
In this case it's approximately the size of a sliding glass door, and we designed it that way not just to replicate a sliding glass door, but also so we could get an even exposure to the target facade, which I'll highlight later about why that's important.

00:32:18.980 --> 00:32:23.852
But yeah, so the scenario of fire venting out an opening of roughly that size.

00:32:25.242 --> 00:32:31.164
And the scenario where the fire is primarily outside of the structure and, let's say, attacks the interior of the structure.

00:32:31.164 --> 00:32:41.358
How do you come up with representative scenarios for those exposures Range of radiant, heat fluxes, firebrands, convection how do you manage?

00:32:41.378 --> 00:32:41.519
those.

00:32:41.519 --> 00:32:50.311
This kind of goes back to different variables and mechanisms of fire spread, but we're primarily looking at the impact of radiant exposure.

00:32:50.311 --> 00:32:59.394
So these experiments did not involve firebrands, but rather they just involved the radiant exposure from an adjacent structure fire.

00:33:00.779 --> 00:33:11.753
In your papers you also cover how structures respond to that and there was a term in your papers called the structure hardening as a key strategy to mitigate this building destruction.

00:33:11.753 --> 00:33:16.367
And I also understand this was some also previous research carried.

00:33:16.367 --> 00:33:32.402
Before you go into exposing and testing your hypothesis, rebecca, can you tell me more about how the structures were prepared to wildfires and, again, how looking into those structures allowed you to craft this new experimental program?

00:33:32.942 --> 00:33:58.030
Yeah, so looking at once, we identified that structures are a key source of fire spread during these complications, looking at what different materials of the structure can we focus on to see if there are better designs that might make those materials more non-combustible and help to increase the chance of a home surviving during a complication.

00:33:58.030 --> 00:34:19.041
And so one of my first projects at FSRI while I was still an intern was doing a large literature search on what research had been done in the wildland urban interface space, and a lot of that focused on modeling, also looking at vegetation fires, not including the structures.

00:34:19.041 --> 00:34:34.235
But from that we were able to identify key components of structures that are especially vulnerable and need to be addressed, and from that we came to the conclusion of starting to study cladding or windows more in depth.

00:34:35.260 --> 00:34:38.347
Yeah, and how about have you looked into things like I don't know?

00:34:38.347 --> 00:34:51.722
Ventilation openings or a roof structure is something that comes to my mind as an extremely complex, like if I was an ember, I would like to land in the joint between the roof and the house, or the windows were so apparent.

00:34:51.722 --> 00:34:54.771
That is the main research gap today.

00:34:55.440 --> 00:34:57.826
Yeah, that's the main research gap we focused on.

00:34:57.826 --> 00:35:03.929
Roofing materials are definitely also identified as a vulnerable part of a structure.

00:35:03.929 --> 00:35:08.606
We haven't really gone into too much depth in that area yet.

00:35:09.342 --> 00:35:10.505
And the evolution of windows.

00:35:10.505 --> 00:35:15.722
What did your literature study tell you about the changing threads of the Windows?

00:35:15.722 --> 00:35:24.672
Is it something you can identify from the statistics, looking back into the fires, that, for example, we are more or less vulnerable today than we were, I don't know, 20 years ago?

00:35:25.659 --> 00:35:31.505
We definitely have more designs of Windows, and the designs of windows have evolved and changed.

00:35:31.505 --> 00:35:35.590
Now we have double pane windows are more common, as Joe mentioned earlier.

00:35:35.590 --> 00:35:43.396
There's the low E coatings on the windows, different gas fills and double pane windows that are typically used to increase energy efficiency.

00:35:43.396 --> 00:35:58.336
To this research, there hadn't been much research conducted on looking at how those different design choices can impact how a window responds when it faces an exterior fire exposure.

00:35:59.179 --> 00:35:59.561
Yeah.

00:35:59.561 --> 00:36:08.829
One more question in general to the whole project is we are talking about the fire spread through the wall, whatever is a part of that wall.

00:36:08.829 --> 00:36:10.914
But is it like binary?

00:36:10.914 --> 00:36:17.742
If the fire has spread, you consider the structure lost at that point, or you still consider how bad is the spread?

00:36:17.742 --> 00:36:18.887
How much is ignited?

00:36:18.887 --> 00:36:25.228
What's being ignited inside, or is it irrelevant, because as soon as it spreads there's no way to respond?

00:36:25.228 --> 00:36:39.012
Also, this is an interesting firefighting consideration angle, because if it's just one house at the edge of the forest then probably they can put all their focus on it, but if there's a thousand in a neighborhood, then it must be a different story.

00:36:39.434 --> 00:37:01.135
Yeah, thinking about the kind of the binary nature oftentimes we think of for fire, impacting these configuration events is a combination of factors, like you said, and during these events a lot of times it's more fires than local resources firefighting resources can respond to and kept capacity to, like water supply.

00:37:01.135 --> 00:37:09.152
There's also oftentimes factors like the wind and the rate of spread that drive other incident priorities like evacuation.

00:37:09.152 --> 00:37:17.750
So you know, a fire engine might drive past three or four structures that are just igniting to get to a location where they can help for evacuation.

00:37:17.750 --> 00:37:22.947
So there's, you know these are large scale, oftentimes large scale events that have lots of different factors.

00:37:22.947 --> 00:37:42.429
But if we just kind of think about it, even from a control setting, when fire transitions from the exterior into the structure and it's sustained, it's not intermittent, it's not self-extinction, it's a sustained ignition of the structure, a lot of times that will transition to being destroyed.

00:37:42.429 --> 00:37:49.740
And this is just the fact of, you know, I think, a lot of building constructions and building science fire from the exterior to the interior.

00:37:49.740 --> 00:38:05.373
We have a lot of construction practices that limits fire spread from one compartment to another on the interior, like gypsum walls and fire barriers, attention.

00:38:05.454 --> 00:38:22.443
I think that this highlights the need to both better understand it from a research and a phenomenon perspective, as well as translating that knowledge to implementation, whether it be at codes and standards level, whether it be as guidance or best practices for designers, engineers, architects.

00:38:22.443 --> 00:38:32.793
But kind of coming back to the question, fhir need not be binary, but the accumulation of factors, weather, resources, other priorities.

00:38:32.793 --> 00:38:40.340
Oftentimes we think about that if a structure ignites and it sustains that ignition, it's most likely to be destroyed.

00:38:40.340 --> 00:38:54.224
There are a few structures that are ignited and damaged but not destroyed, but in most cases that not transitioning to destruction is attributed to suppression or defensive actions by firefighters or others.

00:38:54.224 --> 00:39:12.204
So, again, thinking about it from a fire science or fire phenomenon perspective, the goal is to reduce, to limit the potential that a structure or fire transitions from the exterior to the interior, so that it doesn't require a firefighter or someone to suppress it.

00:39:12.847 --> 00:39:33.648
So one thing that makes this scenario different than your just typical structure fire or even have one, maybe two structures on fire and you can have enough resources from the fire department respond that they're focused on those structures is that now, instead of just one or two structures on fire, you have 10, 20 more structures on fire and more structures in danger of being on fire.

00:39:33.648 --> 00:39:48.347
So pretty quickly, resources become quite limited and fire departments have to triage and there's a chance that they are not going to get to a structure that's already ignited and be able to suppress the fire.

00:39:48.347 --> 00:39:59.913
So one of the goals of this research is looking at different construction methods and building components and what can you incorporate to have a home that can resist ignition.

00:40:00.880 --> 00:40:07.523
This is so far probably the longest buildup to an experiment I've ever had in the podcast, but it's well well worth it.

00:40:08.003 --> 00:40:29.333
However, let's maybe try to summarize the rationale part of of this podcast and in in the next episode we'll go deep into how does one translate from a wildfire scenario into laboratory scenario and we'll go deeper into your experiments on heat transfer through windows.

00:40:29.333 --> 00:40:35.572
We'll go into the window pane fallouts and also external fires and residential structures.

00:40:35.572 --> 00:40:40.112
So there's a lot to uncover from this work that the Nits and Bits of their research.

00:40:40.112 --> 00:41:08.028
But perhaps let's try to build a concise summary how the field has changed over the years and what a fire safety engineer should consider in designing a fire-safe community from this perspective of historical knowledge that we have on urban configurations or wildfires transferring it, what was omitted in fire safety engineering previously and how they can.

00:41:08.028 --> 00:41:11.139
If someone is charged with designing a community, let's say because fire safety engineering previously, and how they can.

00:41:11.139 --> 00:41:16.288
If someone is charged with designing a community, let's say because fire safety engineering for communities may perhaps be a job for the future.

00:41:17.059 --> 00:41:35.210
So I think, when we think about wildfires, wildfires often get a lot of highlight in the news, whether it be hundreds of thousands of acres burning in very remote areas, but more oftentimes when that wildfire or brush fire transitions into the built environment and so that wildfire initiated.

00:41:35.210 --> 00:41:40.132
Complication, I think, is where fire safety engineers need to play a role.

00:41:40.132 --> 00:42:02.717
Wildfires in the wildland has traditionally been addressed by foresters and those in the land use space, but fire safety engineers have a long and trusted history of understanding and appreciating the impact of fire and developing smart and innovative design solutions, whether it be materials or components, or structures altogether, to address them.

00:42:02.717 --> 00:42:06.213
So I think that that's again where fire safety engineers really need to play a role.

00:42:06.213 --> 00:42:08.501
There's a lot of opportunities to do that.

00:42:08.501 --> 00:42:17.262
I mean we can take learnings from industrial fire safety engineering to spread hazards out, to produce the potential for fire spread.

00:42:17.282 --> 00:42:21.721
So we think about the assets that we care about, the homes, how can we spread them out.

00:42:22.141 --> 00:42:27.882
Sometimes that's not always possible, so we can think about how do we harden structures and harden assets.

00:42:27.882 --> 00:43:13.940
So buildings and homes are accumulation of the components, the roofs, the vents, the walls, the eaves, all of these components, the windows through them, and so designers need to recognize that it's not just one component Having a fire resistant roof, say, or having ember resistant vents isn't necessarily good enough because fire will find the path of least resistance and then also really recognizing that it's multiple mechanisms and combinations of the radiant heat and direct flame contact and fiber into embers that oftentimes result in structure ignition and that, different from traditional structure fire protection, a lot of times we won't have or there will be limited emergency response.

00:43:13.940 --> 00:43:39.371
So acknowledging these limitations and putting them into the design criteria at the front documents and recommendations and codes and standards begin to improve, referring to them and incorporating them earlier on instead of just as an afterthought, I think is an important role that, again, fire safety engineers need to and can play in this space.

00:43:40.061 --> 00:43:42.972
Yeah, fire safety engineers have a very important role to play in this.

00:43:42.972 --> 00:43:56.451
As communities are being planned, there's a lot of different inputs that come into that and fire safety has not traditionally always been one of those key pieces that have been raised to the forefront.

00:43:56.451 --> 00:44:16.925
There's a lot of effort and cost and focus put on energy efficiency, and energy efficiency is a great thing for us and it can impact fire safety some ways for the good and some ways for the bad, depending on how that energy efficiency, how the insulation, may perform in terms of its fire safety.

00:44:16.925 --> 00:44:19.514
There's also, particularly in the western United States, a large focus being put on reducing urban sprawl.

00:44:19.514 --> 00:44:25.592
So what often that's doing is a lot of communities being planned out here are being put as close together as possible.

00:44:26.340 --> 00:44:51.402
While that makes sense from many different perspectives, what we also see is that's how we see a lot of the structure-to-structure fire spread being driven in these large-scale events where you have very close spacing on the order of two to three to four meters worth of spacing between each of these structures, and that is going to continue to grow and drive some of the communities that are being developed out in the western United States.

00:44:51.443 --> 00:44:56.481
So the fire safety engineers have to be able to have a seat at that table also to identify.

00:44:56.481 --> 00:45:04.925
These are the concerns that we have, that we have to build with more energy efficiency as well as fire safety in place.

00:45:04.925 --> 00:45:19.849
At the same time, we're doing this in order to reduce that risk for structure-to-structure fire spread by continuing to understand the trade-offs in the materials in terms of how well they provide insulation, how well they protect from the environment, but also how well they work.

00:45:19.849 --> 00:45:46.929
When we have very near fuels right next to each other, including another structure that might be right next door, how we can start to understand that fire spread and how we can help to work with the communities to make sure that these are structures that can survive within the environment that they are designed for, but also are sustainable engineering solutions so that they can continue to be there for several years into the future.

00:45:46.929 --> 00:45:47.873
Perfect.

00:45:48.000 --> 00:45:56.150
Let's move into the experiments, and if you're listening to this, this part is coming up in the next episode and that's it.

00:45:56.150 --> 00:45:59.914
If you reached this far, I don't have to advertise the next episode for you.

00:45:59.914 --> 00:46:18.563
It's full of actionable knowledge really data sets, experiments, conclusions of those experiments, how those experiments interplay together, what new knowledge was unraveled through this experimental program and how we can take actions based on what fsri was researching.

00:46:18.563 --> 00:46:24.059
I think big projects like this require massive spotlight on them.

00:46:24.059 --> 00:46:33.289
It's very rare that scientists try to solve such a big problem like urban fire spread, and it's not possible, you know, with a small research project.

00:46:33.289 --> 00:46:42.929
You really need to attack those things with good budget, a lot of experiments, good research outline, and that's what I wanted to show you in this podcast episode.

00:46:42.929 --> 00:47:01.150
How do researchers who are the best in what they're doing in the world, how do they come up with those experimental programs, how do they plan their next steps, what factors influence their research choices and how those interesting research concepts, research ideas, become a reality?

00:47:01.150 --> 00:47:08.766
In the show notes of the episode, you will find multiple reading materials from the project that we were discussing today, so it's not just a podcast episode.

00:47:08.766 --> 00:47:15.246
There's much more for you to unravel, and feel free to reach out to those materials, which are readily available.

00:47:15.619 --> 00:47:18.088
Fsri makes sure that everything is open access.

00:47:18.088 --> 00:47:24.268
Fsri publishes a lot of auxiliary material that follows up the research projects.

00:47:24.268 --> 00:47:31.461
They really really put a lot of effort on making data and knowledge accessible for the society, for firefighters.

00:47:31.461 --> 00:47:37.161
I had an episode with Steve Kerber from FSRI on why this is the core of their philosophy.

00:47:37.161 --> 00:47:56.849
So podcasts like this and materials produced by FSRI are definitely the greatest source of fire knowledge that you can have, and from those materials and the next podcast episode you will learn a lot on the exact things that were studied in their project on the fire spread through external walls.

00:47:56.849 --> 00:47:59.342
So that's it for this podcast episode.

00:47:59.342 --> 00:48:03.760
Thank you for listening and next week, some more great fire science coming your way.

00:48:03.760 --> 00:48:07.581
You know exactly what to expect, so I hope to see you then.

00:48:07.581 --> 00:48:08.543
It's really worth it.

00:48:08.543 --> 00:48:09.362
Cheers, bye.